Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004920
Original file (20110004920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  20 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004920 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states:

* In May 1968 while in Cu-Chi he was wounded in the lower left leg during a mortar attack
* He was treated by a field medic and released for duty 
* He gave his name, rank, and service number to the medic for the Purple Heart

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 August 1967 for a period of 3 years.  He served as a quarry machine operator in Vietnam from 7 February 1968 to 
21 June 1968.  On 30 July 1969, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Standby to complete his remaining service obligation. 

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

4.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.  

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He contends he received a wound to his lower left leg during a mortar attack in May 1968 in Vietnam.  

2.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION
 
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004920





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004920



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009496

    Original file (20110009496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 12 May 1969. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to award him a second Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 26 August 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 12 May 1969; b. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013491

    Original file (20110013491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * A map of Vietnam * DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 4 July 1964 and 26 March 1970 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Purple Heart requires: * a wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records * official orders awarding the decoration 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010753

    Original file (20100010753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090003313 on 30 July 2009. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster; his DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004280

    Original file (20130004280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Since there is no evidence in the available records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010505

    Original file (20120010505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show award of the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge. In the absence of documentary evidence to show he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for such wounds, or that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the Purple Heart in this case. There is no evidence in his record that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and he has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012962

    Original file (20070012962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430

    Original file (20100026430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005057

    Original file (20090005057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides three photographs as new evidence. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021322

    Original file (20090021322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided his Hearing Officer's Decision, dated 20 May 1996, that shows the VA granted him service connection for residuals, shell fragment wound of the left thigh. The fact that the applicant provided documentation from VA granting him service connection for residuals, shell fragment wound of the left thigh is not sufficient evidence to conclude that he is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart. There is no medical evidence available that shows the applicant was wounded or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013907

    Original file (20090013907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both Soldiers stated that the applicant sustained wounds from mortar fragments in his hand and back. There are no medical records available which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam. There is no reason to doubt the statements provided by fellow Soldiers who witnessed the mortar attack, however, without medical evidence corroborating that the applicant was wounded, there is an insufficient basis for award of the...