Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004280
Original file (20130004280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    31 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004280 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart in two applications.

2.  The applicant states:

* in one application, he was wounded in the right ankle in 1966 and was treated at a field hospital and sent back to work
* in a second application, he was wounded in the left lower leg in 1966
* the information supporting this incident can be found in his medical records or in the unit morning report
* a good friend, R____ H____, was injured at the same time and they were in the hospital together 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) letter, dated 17 July 2012
* VA Rating Decision, dated 30 October 2012

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 September 1965.  He served as a stock control and accounting specialist assigned to Company C, 168th Engineer Combat Battalion, in Vietnam from 1 February 1966 to 1 June 1966 and he was assigned to Company B, 588th Engineer Combat Battalion, in Vietnam from 2 June 1966 to 12 January 1967.  On 12 September 1967, he was honorably released from active duty.

3.  His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

4.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

5.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

6.  His medical records are not available for review.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

8.  He provides VA documentation which states:

* he was granted service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (70 percent)
* he indicated in his stressor statement that a friend, R____ H____, was killed
* the U.S. Army Casualty Database information available verifies that R____ H____ was wounded in action on 26 July 1966
* the unit history submitted by the 588th Engineer Battalion did not document any enemy attacks during May 1966, but verifies a mortar attack occurred on 27 May 1966 and the unit sustained enemy attacks on 26-27 July 1967 resulting in casualties and damages
* he received a disability rating for a scar, left lower leg, non-symptomatic (0 percent)

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was wounded in the right ankle or left lower leg in Vietnam in 1966.

2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes basic requirements for award of the Purple Heart and all other awards.  The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify:

* the wound was the result of hostile action
* treatment of the wound by medical personnel
* documentation of the wound in official records

3.  The VA documentation provided by the applicant does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

4.  Since there is no evidence in the available records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004280



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004280



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010753

    Original file (20100010753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090003313 on 30 July 2009. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster; his DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015153

    Original file (20100015153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect a combat wound or injury and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show awards of the Purple Heart or the Bronze Star Medal. His service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart; his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster; his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds; and his official medical records are not available for review. Notwithstanding his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012770

    Original file (20080012770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he sustained shrapnel wounds during a mortar and rocket attack on the evening of 26 March 1969 while stationed at Dong Tam base camp in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Purple Heart should be reconsidered based on new evidence he presents concerning shrapnel wounds he sustained during a mortar and rocket attack on the evening of 26 March 1969 while stationed at Dong Tam base camp in the RVN. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000406

    Original file (20080000406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 September 1967, the applicant returned to dispensary and his sutures were removed. This regulation also provides that there are no time limitations for requests for award of the Purple Heart. Although the record does show that the applicant was injured while he was in Vietnam, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to show that any of his injuries were the result of hostile action by enemy forces.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029389

    Original file (20100029389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record does not contain any orders which show he was awarded the Purple Heart or medical documentation that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The applicant's service record does not contain any orders awarding him the Purple Heart or evidence to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action during his tour of duty in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004457

    Original file (20090004457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was then reassigned to the 578th Signal Company (USARPAC, RVN) in duty MOS 36C2O from 7 July 1967 to 15 January 1968 and then served in duty MOS 76Y4O from 16 January to 20 February 1968. c. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009496

    Original file (20110009496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 12 May 1969. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to award him a second Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 26 August 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 12 May 1969; b. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002041

    Original file (20110002041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was wounded in Vietnam and he should have been awarded the Purple Heart is not in doubt, he failed to show sufficient evidence through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was, in fact, wounded/injured as a result of enemy action and that treatment for his wound was made a matter of official record. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012962

    Original file (20070012962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001543

    Original file (20090001543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart and that it be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). No entry appears in item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) to show he received a wound in action against a hostile force while he served in Vietnam. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must...