Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004348
Original file (20110004348.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004348 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

2.  The applicant states he never received the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his Taiwan service.  He contends he served with Company C, 809th Engineer Battalion, during the period August 1958 through January 1959 in Formosa [now known as Taiwan].

3.  The applicant provides copies of envelopes mailed to his mother and his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, and has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 September 1957.  He held military occupational specialty 523.10 (refrigeration specialist).  The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four/E-4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 2 September 1960 due to the expiration of his term of service.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he received credit for 1 year, 4 months, and 20 days of foreign service; however, it does not list the location or the unit that service was associated with.

5.  The applicant provides copies of four envelopes mailed home from overseas.  The return address listed is that of Company C, 809th Engineer Battalion, and includes an Army Post Office destination for Taiwan.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during specified time periods.  An individual who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in or be engaged in the direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the area of operations.

7.  Army Regulation 600-6-22 lists the Taiwan Straits during the period 23 August 1958 to 1 January 1959 as an authorized military operation for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 defines "area of operation" as the foreign territory upon which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the direct support of the designated military operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of operations; and the airspace above and adjacent to the area in which operations are being conducted.  "Direct support" is defined as services being supplied to participating forces in the area of eligibility by ground units, ships, and aircraft provided it involves actually entering the designated area of eligibility.  This includes units, ships, and aircraft providing logistic, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support within the designated area of eligibility.  "Area of eligibility" is defined as the foreign territory on which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of the operation; and the air space above and adjacent to the area in which operations are being conducted.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was carefully considered and was determined to have merit.

2.  The evidence provided by the applicant, along with the foreign service entries on his DD Form 214, proves sufficient to show he was assigned in Taiwan.  Accordingly, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal to his DD Form 214.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004348



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004348



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015199

    Original file (20110015199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was deployed to the Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan with the 2nd Missile Battalion, 71st Artillery from 8 October 1958 to 25 August 1959. The documents provided by the applicant contain his name and show he was located at APO 63, which at the time of his service covered the area of Taiwan.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024778

    Original file (20110024778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). No other awards or decorations are recorded in section 9. In this case, the evidence of record confirms the applicant received less than "excellent" ratings during the period 21 May through 20 September 1960 while serving in Germany.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003724

    Original file (20110003724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the National Defense Service Medal and Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. Evidence shows the applicant served on active duty in Germany at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018515

    Original file (20080018515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for operations in Lebanon and Grenada. “Area of eligibility” is defined as the foreign territory on which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of the operation; and the air space above and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020601

    Original file (20090020601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and that she served in Bosnia-Herzegovina in support of Operations Joint Endeavor/Guard. While the certificate indicates the applicant served in support of Operation Joint Endeavor/Guard, there is insufficient corroborating...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018207

    Original file (20130018207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within specific geographic areas during specified time periods. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant was assigned to a U.S. Army unit in Germany and there is no evidence that she or her unit participated in Operation El Dorado Canyon.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027569

    Original file (20100027569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during specified time periods. As such, there is insufficient evidence in which to award him the AFEM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000809

    Original file (20100000809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFEM was awarded for service in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963. While an AFEM was awarded for service in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963, the applicant had already been REFRAD in August 1962 and thus could not qualify for that award. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011603

    Original file (20120011603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011603 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * An extract from "Wikipedia" regarding the "Contras" * A Department of the Army Summary of Cabanas 86 * A news article regarding U.S. Army engineers in Honduras * An internet article regarding a Nicaraguan incursion into Honduras * A DD Form 1610 (Request and Authorization for Temporary Duty (TDY) Travel of DOD Personnel) * A DD Form 1351-2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001350

    Original file (20110001350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110001350 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) for the period 26 May 1961 through 24 January 1964 shows he served in Korea from 12 July 1961 through 11 September 1962 in section 5 (Service Outside the Continental United States).