Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004198
Original file (20110004198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004198


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he retired in the rank/grade of major (MAJ)/O-4.  

2.  The applicant states he was retired as a MAJ.

3.  The applicant provides:

* letter, subject: Approval of Extension of Service, dated 21 April 1969
* letter, subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, dated 4 January 1980
* letter, subject: Voluntary Retirement, dated 11 April 1980
* Orders S119-7, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center (MILPERCEN), Alexandria, VA, dated 18 June 1980
* DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 18 June 1980
* Orders 132-1, Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Riley, KS, dated 9 July 1980
* DD Form 214
* letter, subject: Request for Statement of Service, dated 12 July 1991
* letter, official statement of service, dated 21 November 1991
* DA Form 4037 (Officer Record Brief) (2 pages)
* DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 24 February 1967, after previous enlisted service and graduation from Officer Candidate School, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, in the rank/grade of second lieutenant/O-1.  
On this date, he simultaneously entered active service after 6 years, 4 months, and 26 days of previous active service.  

3.  On 24 February 1969, he was promoted in the Army of the United States (AUS) to captain (CPT).

4.  On 9 February 1973, he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army to CPT, effective 23 February 1973.

5.  On 4 January 1980, he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army to MAJ, effective 22 February 1980.  His promotion notification letter states:

If you are serving on active duty in a commissioned grade lower than that to which promoted you may elect to be released from active duty and receive your promotion after your release from active duty, provided you do not have an uncompleted period of active duty under law or regulations…  If you do not elect to be relieved from active duty, you may expressly decline the promotion.  If you do not decline the promotion and remain on active duty, you will be deemed to have accepted a temporary (AUS) appointment in the grade in which serving on active duty and your promotion as a Reserve officer will not affect your active duty grade (emphasis added).

6.  Orders S119-7, dated 18 June 1980, show he was to be retired in the rank/grade of MAJ/O-4 effective 30 September 1980.
7.  On 30 September 1980, he was honorably retired after completing 20 years and 3 days of total active service.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his DD Form 214 shows his rank as CPT and item 4b (Pay Grade) shows his pay grade as O-3.

8.  He provides:

* DA Form 3713, dated 18 June 1980, which shows his active duty grade as CPT, but also shows his retired grade, permanent grade, and highest grade held as MAJ
* Orders 132-1, Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Riley, KS, dated 9 July 1980, which shows his rank at the time of his separation as CPT

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual's service as it exists on the date of release from active duty, discharge, or retirement.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he retired in the rank/grade of MAJ/O-4 was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.

2.  The applicant held simultaneous appointments in the AUS and Reserve component of the Army.  He was promoted to MAJ in the Reserve component of the Army; however, he was not promoted in the AUS.  His promotion notification memo clearly stated that acceptance of his Reserve promotion and retention on active duty would not affect his active duty grade; 

3.  His DD Form 214 should reflect his rank and grade while serving on active duty.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 was correctly prepared and he is not entitled to the requested relief.  

4.  However, as a matter of equity, there is no harm to the Army or the Soldier if item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 is amended to reflect his Reserve promotion.  





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 to add the entry "Promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army to MAJ effective 22 February 1980." 

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending items 4a and 4b of his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as MAJ.



      _____________X____________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005877



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004198



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000391

    Original file (20140000391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Orders S144-4, dated 27 July 1981 * his DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 with an effective date of 30 November 1981 shows his rank as SFC and his pay grade as E-7. This regulation states that the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation will be entered in Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008253

    Original file (20060008253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides orders promoting him to 2LT in the USAR with a date of rank (DOR) of 11 January 1967, orders promoting him to 1LT in the Army of the United States (AUS) with a DOR of 11 January 1968, orders promoting him to CPT in the AUS with a DOR of 11 January 1969, a letter, dated 1 December 1979, from the Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri which indicated that he was to be promoted to MAJ with a DOR of 9 January 1980 [which was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009887

    Original file (20070009887.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 December 1979, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, Virginia, published Orders Number 339-1, announcing the applicant's promotion to SFC/E-7 with an effective date of 1 January 1980 and a date of rank of 31 December 1979. Evidence of record further shows that the applicant held a dual status as a commissioned officer in the USAR and as an enlisted member of the RA on active duty. Although the applicant was promoted to the grade of MAJ/O-4 effective 16 December 1977, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005133C070205

    Original file (20060005133C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 June 1980, while serving on active duty in the rank of CPT, the applicant submitted his request for voluntary retirement to be effective 31 October 1980. On 31 October 1980, the applicant was REFRAD in the rank of CPT and was transferred to the Retired List in the rank of MAJ. His DD Form 214 was properly prepared to reflect the rank he held on the date he was REFRAD and he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that such was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013559

    Original file (20070013559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends if he had been promoted to LTC with a date of rank of 24 June 1983, it would have given him the time in grade and the active duty service requirement to retire in the grade of LTC. The opinion continues that the applicant's promotion eligibility date to LTC was 23 September 1989, however, he was appointed a warrant officer on 24 June 1988 and was not eligible for promotion consideration to LTC. Additionally, the applicant contends that his records should show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058032C070420

    Original file (2001058032C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. A Department of the Army (DA) Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 25 April 1994, confirms the applicant as a result of his having satisfactorily served in the highest grade to which he was promoted, paid, and served in on active duty as a commissioned officer, was placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of CPT/0-3, effective 10 February 1994. The record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059682C070421

    Original file (2001059682C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was denied promotion to LTC in the USAR because: 1) there are two dates on his record for appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT), USAR, 14 June 1951, which is the correct one, and 23 October 1952, which caused error in computing promotion eligibility dates; 2) he was not promoted to first lieutenant (1LT), USAR, until 13 May 1955, 47...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007246

    Original file (20080007246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his retired rank as a major (MAJ) instead of captain (CPT). Rather, his service on active duty after his REFRAD as a USAR CPT was entirely served as an enlisted member of the Regular Army. It has been noted that the applicant’s DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he was REFRAD as a MAJ O-4 and further indicates that he was serving as a commissioned officer at the time of his REFRAD, when in fact he was serving on active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018687

    Original file (20140018687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant truly believes that, after his acceptance of appointment to the rank/pay grade of chief warrant officer two (CW2)/W-2 and the pattern of his speedy advancement to the rank/pay grade of CW4/W-4, had he been retained on active duty as an RA officer in the rank/pay grade of MAJ/O-4, he would have advanced to at least the rank/pay grade of LTC/O-5 in a relatively short time and been able to retire in that grade. The applicant's requests for correction of his record to show that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015586

    Original file (20100015586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provides his April 2010 LES which shows his PEBD (Pay Entry Basic date) as 3 February 1976 (the date he initially enlisted in the USAR) and that he was receiving pay based on 34 years of total service. Section 010101 (service which is creditable) states for most members who enter and serve on active duty without a break in service, the basic pay date is the date the member enters active or inactive service. d. Section 010103A(2) (Creditable Prior Enlisted Service) states...