Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008253
Original file (20060008253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  27 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060008253 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.



Acting Director



Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:



Chairperson


Member


Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an adjustment of his dates of rank to captain (CPT) and major (MAJ) in the United States Army Reserve (USAR).

2.  The applicant essentially states that his dates of rank as a commissioned officer should be as follows:

	a.  second lieutenant (2LT):  11 January 1967;

	b.  first lieutenant (1LT):  11 January 1968;

	c.  CPT:  11 January 1969; and

	d.  MAJ:  should have been 11 January 1976. 

3.  The applicant provides orders promoting him to 2LT in the USAR with a date of rank (DOR) of 11 January 1967, orders promoting him to 1LT in the Army of the United States (AUS) with a DOR of 11 January 1968, orders promoting him to CPT in the AUS with a DOR of 11 January 1969, a letter, dated 1 December 1979, from the Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri which indicated that he was to be promoted to MAJ with a DOR of 9 January 1980 [which was subsequently voided because he retired on 
30 September 1979], a letter, dated 6 August 1979, showing that he had a projected promotion eligibility date (PED) of 9 January 1980, and a letter, dated on or about 18 October 1991, from the United States Army Reserve Personnel Center, which informed the applicant that he was advanced on the retired list to the rank of CPT, which was the highest grade he satisfactorily held, in support of this application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 
30 September 1979, the date of his retirement.  The application submitted in this case is dated 6 June 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records show that he was commissioned in the USAR as a 2LT on 11 January 1967, and concurrently ordered to active duty.  While on active duty, he was temporarily promoted to 1LT in the AUS with a DOR on 
11 January 1968. He was also temporarily promoted to CPT in the AUS with a DOR of 11 January 1969.  

4.  On 5 October 1973, the applicant was released from active duty.  In accordance with the laws and regulations in effect at the time, his temporary promotions to 1LT and CPT in the AUS were vacated at the time of his release from active duty.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that was issued to him at the time of his release from active duty on 5 October 1973 also shows that his permanent promotion to CPT in the USAR was effective 10 January 1973.

5.  The applicant’s military records also show that he was promoted to 1LT in the USAR with a DOR on 11 January 1969.  They also show that he was promoted to CPT in the USAR with a DOR on 10 January 1973.

6.  The applicant essentially stated that he should have been promoted to MAJ in the USAR on 11 January 1976, or 7 years from his DOR to CPT in the AUS.  However, promotion to MAJ in the USAR required 12 years time in service or 
7 years time in grade from his USAR CPT DOR, and the applicant’s PED was the later of the two dates.  As the applicant’s service as a commissioned officer began on 11 January 1967, he completed 12 years time in service on 11 January 1979.  As he was promoted to CPT in the USAR on 10 January 1973, he would have completed 7 years time in grade on 10 January 1980.  However, the applicant retired on 30 September 1979.

7.  The applicant provided a letter, dated 1 December 1979, from the Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri which indicated that he was to be promoted to MAJ with a DOR of 9 January 1980.  However, the applicant was advised in a letter, dated on or about 18 October 1991, that because he voluntarily retired 3 months prior to his PED, his promotion to MAJ had been officially voided.

8.  During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of Reserve Component Promotions, United States Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri.  The advisory opinion essentially stated that because the applicant retired on 30 September 1979, before his PED, his promotion to MAJ was voided.  It also recommended that the applicant’s request be denied.

9.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comment or rebuttal, and he was provided 30 days to have the opportunity to submit a rebuttal to the advisory opinion.  The applicant failed to respond within the time allowed. 

10.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his dates of rank to CPT and MAJ in the USAR should be corrected.

2.  While the Board does not doubt the veracity of the applicant’s contention that he should have been promoted to MAJ in the USAR on 11 January 1976, his temporary promotion to CPT in AUS with a DOR on 11 January 1969 was vacated when he was released from active duty on 5 October 1973.  As a result, his PED to MAJ in the USAR was 10 January 1980, or 7 years time in service from his promotion to CPT in the USAR which occurred on 10 January 1973.  However, as the applicant voluntarily retired prior to his PED to MAJ, he was not promoted.

3.  The applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that an error or injustice occurred.  Absent, such evidence, regularity must be presumed in this case.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 30 September 1979; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 
29 September 1982.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_KLW___  __E.F.   __  __CD___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




____Kenneth L. Wright_________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060008253
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070327
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
AR 15-185
ISSUES         1.
129.0500.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059682C070421

    Original file (2001059682C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was denied promotion to LTC in the USAR because: 1) there are two dates on his record for appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT), USAR, 14 June 1951, which is the correct one, and 23 October 1952, which caused error in computing promotion eligibility dates; 2) he was not promoted to first lieutenant (1LT), USAR, until 13 May 1955, 47...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073123C070403

    Original file (2002073123C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) and/or Special Selection Board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration. The Board notes the applicant's contention that his DOR's for CPT and LTC should be adjusted based on his CSC awarded at appointment. Since his DOR for MAJ has been corrected to 6 June 1991, he is also eligible for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010328

    Original file (20090010328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010328 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's record shows after serving in an enlisted status from 27 November 1984 through 22 June 1990, he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the grade of 2LT and entered the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 23 June 1990. The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to MAJ by the 2006 RCSB and his promotion and Federal recognition dates were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017418C070206

    Original file (20050017418C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that on 18 August 2004 the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) concluded that his promotion eligibility date (PED) for MAJ was 2 November 2003. The applicant further states, in effect, that he subsequently received promotion orders to the grade of rank of MAJ, with an effective date and DOR of 27 December 2004. The USA HRC advisory official states that the applicant was issued a select memorandum, dated 1 November 2005, indicating a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001961

    Original file (20120001961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his dates of rank (DOR) for captain (CPT) and major (MAJ) based on a change to the Army Reserve time-in-grade promotion policy. The advisory official indicated the applicant's DOR to CPT was established by his selection as part of the fiscal year 1999 CPT Army Promotion List Promotion Selection Board and the date he overcame his Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) flag on 24 June 2000. Army Regulation 135-155 also specifies that an officer's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016139

    Original file (20080016139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, consideration for and promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC). On 2 May 1973, the applicant was notified that based on his two time non-selection for promotion to LTC, he was required to be released from active duty (REFRAD) within 90 days of his non-selection notification under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-100 (Personnel Separations – Officer Personnel). Paragraph 3-65 stated that Reserve commissioned officers serving on active duty as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019716

    Original file (20080019716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This HRC-St. Louis promotion official stated that the applicant was REFRAD and transferred to the USAR on 12 May 1999, prior to his promotion eligibility date (PED). The HRC-St. Louis, Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, RC, further states that had the applicant been assigned to a higher graded position upon his 12 May 1999 discharge from the RA and transferred to the USAR he would have been eligible for promotion to CPT on his PED of 1 July 1999, or had he remained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015103

    Original file (20060015103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (As a result, the Regional Personnel Actions Division, Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, indicated that it had administratively corrected the applicant's records to show 3 years of constructive service credit; however, in doing so, actually only credited the applicant with 2 years and 364 days of constructive credit (i.e., 14 January 1981), not 3 years of constructive credit (i.e., 13 January 1981).) On 22 January 2004, the USAR ANC PM provided an advisory opinion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020328

    Original file (20100020328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 July 2003, the ABCMR granted him relief and directed correction of his records to show he was promoted to 1LT with an effective date and DOR of 31 March 1999 (2 years from his DOR as a 2LT). On 11 March 2009, by memorandum, an official at the Department of the Army (DA) Promotions, HRC-STL recommended disapproval of the applicant's request for promotion to CPT with a 2001 DOR and promotion to MAJ with a 2004 DOR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007145

    Original file (20080007145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds, in effect, that it was a failure of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) to promote him to 1LT with a date of rank concurrent with his Army National Guard (ARNG) appointment of 13 April 1953. The applicant also states, in effect, that another error was made when he was non-selected for promotion to CPT. Item 12 (Appointments) of the applicant's DA Form 66, Officer Qualification Record, shows he was promoted to 1LT in the Army of the United States effective 19 August 1951; to 1LT...