Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004141
Original file (20110004141.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  6 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004141 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show this award.

2.  The applicant states he served 3 years honorably and he did not receive an AGCM.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 August 1999 for a period of 3 years.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 45E (Abrams Turret Mechanic).

3.  He served in Kosovo during the period 19 June to 14 December 2000.

4.  On 20 October 2001, the applicant was advanced to the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4.

5.  On 17 August 2002, the applicant was honorably released from active duty at the completion of his required active service and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 3 years of creditable active service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded two awards of the Army Achievement Medal among other awards; however, it does not list the AGCM.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states:

	a.  the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.

	b.  that in instances of disqualification, the unit commander will prepare a statement of the rationale for his/her decision.  This statement will include the period of disqualification and will be referred to the individual concerned for response.  After consideration, if the commander’s decision remains the same, he/she will forward his/her statement, the individual’s statement, and his/her consideration for permanent filing in the individual’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  The immediate commander’s decision to award the AGCM will be based on his/her personal knowledge and of the individual’s official record for the period of service for which the award is to be made.  However, there is no right or entitlement to the award until the immediate commander has approved the award and the award has been announced in permanent orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal because he honorably served his 3-year enlistment.
2.  The applicant’s record shows he distinguished himself in the performance of his military service as evidenced by his advancement to SPC/E-4 and award of two Army Achievement Medals.

3.  There is no evidence of record showing the applicant's commander took any action to deny him award of the Army Good Conduct Medal or that the commander had any reason to do so.  Therefore, it appears he was not awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal as a result of an administrative oversight.  Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and his
DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

__x____  __x______  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
8 August 1999 through 17 August 2002, and

	b.  adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal
(1st Award).



      _________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004141



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004141



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014453

    Original file (20080014453.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award her the AGCM for her qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 September 1997 through 3 September 2000, and to add this award to her record and separation document at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010229

    Original file (20110010229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests the following awards be added to her DD Form 214: * ARCOM * AAM * "Somalia Ribbon" * "Haiti Ribbon" 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding her the AGCM for the period 16 October 1991-15 October 1994 * adding the ARCOM, AAM, and AGCM to her DD Form 214 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001825

    Original file (20140001825.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100000925 on 27 July 2010. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award her the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 20 September 2005 to 29 March 2008 and to correct her DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023344

    Original file (20100023344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record is void of any orders or other documents showing he was ever recommended for or awarded the AAM while serving on active duty. Further, the evidence of record confirms the applicant participated in Operation Joint Guardian in support of Kosovo operations from 28 May through 17 December 2000, as evidenced by the unit commander memorandum provided.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020729

    Original file (20090020729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He served a period of qualified service for award of the SWASM as evidenced by his DA Form 2-1 and item 18 of his DD Form 214. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 29 June 1989 through 29 November 1991 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005339

    Original file (20130005339.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on this information, the applicant’s request for the Cold War Recognition Certificate will not be discussed any further in this Record of Proceedings and is not recorded on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows that certificates of achievement are not awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 16 September 1988...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004503

    Original file (20130004503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) for the period 12 November 2001 – 11 November 2004. If the commander’s decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual’s statement, and his or her consideration for permanent filing in the individual’s AMHRR. Inasmuch as the applicant was not afforded his rights under the prevailing regulation, it would serve the interest of justice to award him the AGCM (5th Award) for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024480

    Original file (20100024480.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the AGCM while stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina; however, it was not included on his DD Form 214. If the commander’s decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual’s statement, and his or her consideration for permanent filing in the individual’s Official Military Personnel File. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002135

    Original file (20110002135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM), a second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and a third award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM). While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000763

    Original file (20100000763.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 2 September 2003 * BSM with “V” Device Narrative * BSM with “V” Device Award Certificate * Unit Commander Employment Recommendation * Battalion Commander Recommendation * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, it is concluded he completed a period of qualifying honorable active duty service and should be awarded the AGCM for the period 4 September...