IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 30 August 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110003849
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
8. On 22 February 2011, new information was received from the applicant in regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090009364, dated 5 November 2009.
9. The evidence submitted consists of a statement from the applicant wherein he contends that the correction recommended and subsequently made in the Record of Proceedings (ROP) was not properly executed in accordance with the documentary evidence and request made by the applicant. The applicant also provides copies of his letter orders for discharge, request for discharge, social security card, and his Honorable Discharge Certificate showing the improper correction.
10. The available evidence clearly shows that the last four numbers of the applicant's social security number should read 5941.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
2. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20090009364, dated 5 November 2009, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicants record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time.
3. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20090009364 failed to recognize that two portions of the applicant's social security number were incorrect. The ROP only directed correction of the middle two numbers, overlooking the reversal error of the center two numbers of the last portion of the social security number.
4. The available evidence clearly shows that the last four numbers of the applicant's social security number should read 5941, and not 5491, as incorrectly shown on his Honorable Discharge Certificate.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ __X____ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090009364, dated 5 November 2009, to show that the applicant's correct social security number is xxx-xx-5941, and that he should be issued a corrected Honorable Discharge Certificate showing this social security number.
__________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110003849
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Supplemental Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110003849
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026078
As a new argument the applicant states: * The State of South Carolina Military Department provided the Army Board of Correction for Military Records (ABCMR) erroneous information * The ABCMR improperly interpreted the intent of an agreement between him and the State * The ABCMR violated its own regulation in overturning a correct decision 3. On 23 October 2009, the applicant submitted a rebuttal statement to the advisory opinion and he indicated that, in accordance with Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005814
At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20130022069, dated 11 September 2014, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicants record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time. Therefore, in order to avoid penalizing the applicant and in order to satisfy the DFAS requirement to state the correct date of placement on the TDRL, the recommendation in ABCMR Docket Number AR20130022069, dated 11 September 2014, should be amended as shown...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003615
The applicant requests correction of her military records to reflect her last name as C----n instead of W---n. 2. There is no evidence of record and she did not provide any evidence showing she requested a legal name change through her unit at any time on or after her marriage in September 2011 or before her discharge on 30 January 2012. The applicant requests correction of her military records to show she served under the last name of C-----.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003899
The applicants DD Form 47, DA Form 873, and all other available service documents in this OMPF show the eighth digit of his SSN as 3. As a result, it appears the SSN listed on the applicants DD Form 214 was the result of an administrative error; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the proper SSN. The applicants DD Form 214 and all other available service documents reflect the applicants middle name as Mickael. 3. _______ _ X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002093
The applicant requests, in effect, the removal of the Army Special Review Board (ASRB) decision memorandum, dated 17 April 2009, and ASRB Record of Proceedings (ROP) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant states his My Board File (MBF) lists an "Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Decision and ROP" and he is requesting the ASRB ROP and related memorandum be removed from his MBF. The OER was subsequently filed in the performance folder of his OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000493
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 August 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000493 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In view of the above, the applicants DD Form 214 should be corrected by: * deleting the Meritorious Unit Commendation * deleting his last duty assignment showing Company B, 2nd Battalion, 60th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division * adding the Valorous Unit Award * showing his last duty assignment as Company B, 5th Battalion, 60th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division BOARD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018840
Had he been informed of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, he would have elected to appear before the medical review board prior to retiring. He provides: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings (ROP) pertaining to another applicant in Docket Number AR20110007954, dated 2 June 2011 * a newspaper article * three DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * a memorandum, subject: Notification of Medical Disqualification [Applicant], dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002900
With respect to the issue of his civilian employment and backpay of the difference in pay between GS-09 and GS-11 from 1 May 2006 to 17 January 2007, Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. Since these records are not filed on the applicant's OMPF and since the applicant neither specified what the error is or what record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012847
The applicant lists the following inconsistencies, errors, inaccuracies, and misrepresentations of fact in the CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE (COE) portion of the ROP: a. paragraph 4 states, "On 25 January 1972, he entered active duty as an MP Regular Army (RA) officer" when, in fact, he entered on active duty on 12 October 1969. b. paragraphs 7-9 discuss his DA Form 67-8 (Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) as a Product Manager for Physical Security Equipment (PM-PSE) during the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000240
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which...