Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003899
Original file (20120003899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    23 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003899 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the social security number (SSN) and middle name listed on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the eighth digit of his SSN as “3,” and the spelling of his middle name as “Michael” instead of “Mickael.”

2.  The applicant states the SSN and middle name listed on his DD Form 214 are incorrect.  He further states the correction is needed for purpose of veterans benefits.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents:

* DD Form 214
* Special Orders Number 281
* State of Michigan Commercial Driver License
* Michigan State Police Application and License to Purchase a Pistol
* Social Security Administration Supplemental Security Income Statement
* DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 March 1968.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 12A (Pioneer).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E3.

3.  Item 1 (Last Name – First Name – Middle Name) of his DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) lists the applicant’s middle name as “Mickael.”   Item 17c (Statement of Local Board Medical Advisor – Remarks) shows the eighth digit of his SSN as "3."  

4.  The applicant‘s DA Form 873 (Certificate of Clearance and/or Security Determination Under EQ 10450) dated 5 December 1968 lists his middle name as “Mickael,” the same middle name and spelling listed on his DD Form 214.  The 5RD Form 856-R (Acknowledgement of Service Obligation) dated                6 March 1968 lists the applicant’s middle name as “Mickael.”  This document also contains his signature.

5.  The applicant’s DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) dated              
5 March 1968 in item 13 (Employment - and Social Security Number) shows the eighth digit of his SSN as “3.”  The applicant provides a letter from the Social Security Administration – Supplemental Security Income dated 18 March 2011 which shows the eighth digit of his SSN as “3.”
 
6.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 8 October 1969.  His DD Form 214 reflects his middle name as “Mickael.”

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  This regulation established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the complete name and SSN of the separating service member would be entered on the DD Form 214.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s DD Form 47, DA Form 873, and all other available service documents in this OMPF show the eighth digit of his SSN as “3.”  As a result, it appears the SSN listed on the applicant’s DD Form 214 was the result of an administrative error; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the proper SSN.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 and all other available service documents reflect the applicant’s middle name as “Mickael.”

3.  The fact the applicant changed the spelling of his middle name is duly noted.  However, this does not change the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time his OMPF was created.

4.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in the available records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record his current middle name in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.

5.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decision document will be filed in his OMPF.  This should serve to clarify any questions that may arise regarding the middle name that is recorded in his OMPF and to satisfy the desire to have the requested name documented in his OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to list his SSN as shown on his Social Security Administration Supplemental Security Income Statement.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing of the applicant’s middle name.  




      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003899



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003899



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021533

    Original file (20110021533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * spelling of his middle name as "Matthew" * the last four digits of his social security number (SSN) as "0795" * his date of birth as 29 Nxxxxxxx xxxx 2. The applicant's military record shows he served in the Army 3 years with the spelling of his middle name and the last four digits of the SSN that are listed on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence that shows he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023398

    Original file (20110023398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * correct spelling of his middle name is "Arnol--" vice "Anor--" * fifth digit of his social security number (SSN) as "2" versus "5" 2. A review of his record also shows the spelling of his middle name as "Arnol--" appears on all documents containing a middle name to include the following forms: * Record of Induction, dated 4 April 1966 * DD Form 398...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012229

    Original file (20110012229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It appears an administrative error occurred during the preparation of his DD Form 214 that listed the first three digits of his SSN as “522.” Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show the same SSN as listed on his Social Security card and other record documents referenced in these Proceedings. With respect to the correction of his DD Form 214 to show his middle name as “Alonso,” the evidence of record shows that upon his induction into the AUS the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004399

    Original file (20120004399.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 4 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120004399 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His service record includes orders published on 4 June 1968 which indicate the seventh and eighth digits of his SSN as "25." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the current entry in item 3 of his DD Form 214 and adding the SSN as it is listed on his social security card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019664

    Original file (20110019664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002892

    Original file (20120002892.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). None of the documents in the applicant's military personnel record list his middle name as "XXXXis." As a result, the Board recommends that the entry in item 3 of the applicant's DD Form 214 be deleted and the SSN be listed as it is listed on his DD Form 398.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002420

    Original file (20120002420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002420 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, it also contains a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) dated 16 July 1966 and a DA Form 2349 (Military Pay Voucher) dated 12 July 1967 which list his SSN using the number “5” as the eighth digit and the number “2” as the ninth digit. The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered active duty and he served under an SSN using the number “5” as the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002163

    Original file (20120002163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * the eighth digit of his social security number (SSN) as "6" instead of "1" * his date of birth (DOB) as 24 May 1943 instead of 13 May 1944 2. Documents contained in the applicant's military personnel records show the eighth digit of his SSN as “6." His service record does not contain any documents that show his DOB as 24 May 1943.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023891

    Original file (20110023891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 47 (Induction Record) does not list an SSN. The evidence of record confirms the applicant provided his correct SSN containing the number "5" as the eighth digit at the time of his induction and it was recorded in several documents and orders throughout his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012905

    Original file (20110012905.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his: * social security number (SSN) ends with the number "3" instead of "2" * date of birth (DOB) is 21 July 19XX instead of 17 July 19XX 2. All documents in his record other than his DD Form 214 show his DOB as 21 July 19XX. The orders releasing the applicant from active duty, a DA Form 20, and his DD Form 214 show an SSN ending with the number "2."