Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001991
Original file (20110001991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	    25 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001991 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be permitted to elect coverage for his spouse under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states he was not properly informed about the SBP application process by the reserve unit administrator when he went to add his spouse to the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS), TRICARE, and to obtain an identification card for her on 30 June 2009.  The applicant further states the unit administrator was contentious, confrontational and did not seem to care about him or his dependent.  Due to the misinformation or misunderstanding he received, he requests a waiver to permit him to elect SBP coverage for his wife.

3.  The applicant provides his marriage certificate and spouse’s DD Form 1173 (United States Uniformed Services Identification and Privilege Card).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 30 August 1966.  He was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 August 1968.  

2.  On 14 August 1997, he received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty Year Letter) from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center.  The applicant retired from the USAR and was placed on the retired list on 5 March 2004, in the rank of sergeant first class.
3.  On 31 January 2006, the applicant submitted DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) which shows he was unmarried, had no eligible dependents and elected not to participate in the SBP.  

4.  The applicant married his spouse on 19 April 2009.

5.  In a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service Retired and Annuity Pay, dated 20 April 2011, the applicant was informed they could not process his SBP request because he had not elected coverage for his spouse within one year of the marriage.

6.  The applicant provided his spouse’s DD Form 1173, the Date of Issue shows 30 June 2009.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted on 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving family members.  The member may elect not to participate (with their spouse’s concurrence, if required), but the election must be made before the first day for which the member is eligible to receive retired pay.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child, may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

9.  The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 established an Open Season for enrollment to be conducted 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006.  The retiree must pay monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a buy-in premium covering all the costs that would have been paid for the election if it had been made at the first opportunity to do so.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request that he be permitted to elect coverage for his spouse under the SBP has been carefully considered.

2.  The applicant states, the unit administrator assisting him was unpleasant, disinterested, and unhelpful while enrolling his spouse in DEERS, TRICARE, and obtaining her an identification card.  The applicant intended to enroll his new spouse in SBP at that time, which was within the statutorily mandated one-year post-marriage enrollment window, but he either did not understand the process or it was not explained to him by the unit administrator.

3.  However, the applicant has submitted no independent evidence establishing that he broached the issue of SBP with the unit administrator, or that the administrator provided poor advice regarding SBP, or that the applicant completed any paperwork whatsoever relating to SBP enrollment which was somehow mishandled.

4.  Unfortunately, it appears the applicant was not reasonably diligent with respect to enrolling his spouse in SBP coverage.  The evidence shows the applicant queried DFAS about SBP enrollment and received a negative response two years after his marriage to his new spouse.  This lack of diligence resulted in his untimely request for coverage.  

5.  When the applicant failed to add his spouse within one year of their marriage, he irrevocably forfeited coverage except during a Congressionally-approved open enrollment period.  There has not been an Open Season since the last one which expired on 30 September 2006.  Enrollment of the spouse as beneficiary will not be possible until another Open Season is authorized.  

6.  In view of the foregoing evidence, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION











BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      
      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001991



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001991



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018219

    Original file (20110018219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He submitted the paperwork to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) 45 days too late * DFAS advised him that he has to wait until Congress declares an Open Season * When he retired in April 2009 (actually April 2007), he was single and he did not elect enrollment in the SBP * When he married in May 2009, he enrolled his spouse in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System and he was assured all benefits to his spouse were taken care of * As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002834

    Original file (20140002834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further asks DFAS, in effect, if they could take the monthly payments from his retired pay during the next open season. He provides insufficient evidence to support his contention that he was given incorrect information from DFAS concerning the requirements to enroll his spouse and son as his SBP beneficiaries and, unfortunately, the request he provides is undated. The last open enrollment season was October 2005 through September 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002256

    Original file (20120002256.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 November 2008, he elected "spouse and child" SBP coverage in anticipation of retiring. The applicant requests a change of his SBP coverage to show he elected "spouse only" coverage within 1 year of marriage. The evidence provided by the applicant shows on that on 16 February 2011 he requested to change/add his new spouse as his SBP beneficiary which was approximately 25 days beyond the 1-year period to make such an election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018128

    Original file (20140018128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The official replied that he had 12 months from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse into SBP, that he could no longer enroll her, and that he would have to wait for the next "SBP Open Enrollment" that is offered every so often. A DFAS official provided, in pertinent part, two letters to the applicant from DFAS, Retired and Annuitant Pay, London, KY, that show: * on 5 July 2012, he was informed that his letter, dated 11 May 2012, was received; however his request for SBP could not be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009333

    Original file (20120009333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner and correction of his daughter's date of birth (DOB) that is recorded in his finance record. Additionally, on 6 November 2012, an official at DFAS confirmed there was no record that the applicant requested enrollment in the SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of his date of marriage. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001439

    Original file (20120001439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner. Records show that during the applicant's retirement processing in 1995 he completed an application for retired pay. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of their marriage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018531

    Original file (20130018531.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was single at the time and he made an SBP election for children only coverage. Therefore, as a matter of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he enrolled his spouse in the SBP within 1 year of his marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant made a voluntary change in his SBP election from child only to spouse and child on 10 July 2008 and that the request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006044

    Original file (20130006044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he added his spouse to his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and SBP election within one year of their marriage. The applicant states he submitted a beneficiary change to reflect his spouse after his marriage on 20 August 1999, and prior to his retirement on 17 December 2012. The applicant retired from the U.S. Army Reserve and was placed on the retired list on 17 December 2012, in the rank of CW2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004861

    Original file (20120004861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He retired on 29 February 1972 and was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC on 1 March 1972. Public Law 97-35, enacted on 12 August 1981, established an open enrollment season for SBP from 1 October 1981-30 September 1982. All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004269

    Original file (20130004269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies: * DD Form 2656-6, dated 19 February 2013 * a State of Colorado Marriage License and Marriage Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence and also in the Army Times. He was authorized up to 1 year from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse and stepchildren in the RCSBP.