Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004861
Original file (20120004861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004861 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states he was married on 5 November 2008.  He went to Fort Benning, GA, for three things:  a dependent identification card, TRICARE medical benefits, and SBP coverage for his spouse.  A lady who presented herself as an authority on the subject told him he would never have an SBP annuity because he did not make an election at the time of retirement.  He feels he was misinformed and given incorrect information.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United states Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* marriage license
* DD Form 1172 (Application for Uniformed Services Identification Card – Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) Enrollment)
* Army Echoes article pertaining to SBP

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he was born on 12 July 1930.

2.  Having prior enlisted service, he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer with concurrent call to active duty on 1 February 1956.  He served in a variety of stateside and overseas assignments and he attained the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC).

3.  On 15 October 1971, he submitted a request for voluntary retirement.  In his request he indicated he had not accomplished the election of options under the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP).  He did not elect to participate in the RSFPP.

4.  He retired on 29 February 1972 and was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC on 1 March 1972.  He completed 24 years, 8 months, and 13 days of total service.  His marital status at the time of his retirement and at the time of the enactment of the SBP is unknown.

5.  On 5 November 2008, he married his spouse, Lucile.

6.  He submitted a DD Form 1172 that shows he enrolled his spouse in DEERS on 10 December 2008 at Fort Benning.  However, there is no evidence he completed and submitted a or DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) within 1 year of his marriage.

7.  Public Law 83-239, enacted on 8 August 1953, established the Uniformed Services Contingency Option Act (USCOA).

8.  Public Law 87-381, enacted on 4 October 1961, established the RSFPP.  The USCOA automatically converted to the RSFPP with the same election options and annuity amounts as the USCOA.  

9.  Public Law 92-425, enacted on 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except under very specific circumstances.  Those previously retired were given the option to enroll in the SBP.

10.  Public Law 97-35, enacted on 12 August 1981, established an open enrollment season for SBP from 1 October 1981-30 September 1982.  Public 101-189, enacted on 29 November 1989, established an open enrollment season from 1 October 1991-30 September 1992 (amended to 1 April 1992-

31 March 1993).  Public Law 108-375, enacted on 28 October 2004, established 
an open enrollment season from 1 October 2005-30 September 2006.  All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence.

11.  The September – December 2008 issue of Army Echoes reminded members to tell DFAS that if they married and wished to enroll in or change an SBP election they had to do so within one year of marriage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant and his current spouse were married on 5 November 2008.  Had this been his first marriage, he would have been authorized up to 1 year from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse in the SBP.  If the applicant had been married when the SBP was established in 1972 and he opted not to enroll in the program, he would have in effect been foreclosed from enrolling in this program except during an open season.

2.  Periodically, Congress enacts laws that establish open enrollment seasons during which certain rules regarding enrollment or disenrollment are announced.  Open seasons generally permit retirees who are not participating to enroll and those not fully participating to increase the level of coverage.  A buy-in cost, typically capturing premiums back to the point a retiree was first eligible for coverage, is associated with open season enrollment.  The last open enrollment season was October 2005 through September 2006.  It is unknown if and when the next open season may be offered.

3.  In view of the foregoing evidence, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004861



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004861



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013961

    Original file (20070013961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: M Chairperson M Member M Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. At this time but before 1 September 1969, a retired member who was participating in the RSFPP without inclusion of the former option 4 could have elected to have that option included in his election. The FSM retired in November 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090124C070212

    Original file (2003090124C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The evidence of record shows the FSM retired on 1 August 1969, prior to establishment of the SBP, and was married at that time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065549C070421

    Original file (2001065549C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM military records show: He retired before the SBP was established; however, there is no evidence to show he enrolled in either of the two previous survivor benefit programs available to him.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077690C070215

    Original file (2002077690C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). An election to provide an annuity of one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth of the member's retired pay had to be made before the end of the 18th year of service. Records at DFAS-CL show that he failed to enroll in the SBP when it was established in 1972 and there is no evidence to show he attempted to enroll during a subsequent Open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028925

    Original file (20100028925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the FSM did not keep up with his retired service member benefits. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018686 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028925 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017621

    Original file (20140017621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the FSM's military records and the applicant provides no evidence which shows the FSM participated in the SBP or the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP). The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Since there is no evidence of record which shows the FSM made an SBP election prior to his death, and the evidence of record shows he had opportunities...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013792

    Original file (20070013792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Echoes also warned that for a retiree with a high number of years since first being able to enroll a beneficiary in the SBP and whose retired pay was fairly high, the enrollment premium alone could exceed $50,000. The available evidence shows that the FSM was eligible to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage when it was established in 1972 or during any one of several subsequent Open Seasons. Even if the FSM had attempted to enroll in the SBP during the 1 October 2005 through 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005547

    Original file (20110005547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110005547 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she married the FSM after he retired from the service. There is no indication the FSM elected to participate in the USCOA, the RSFPP, or the SBP, either at the time of or immediately following his retirement or during any of the later open enrollment seasons.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102540C070208

    Original file (2004102540C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Extensive publicity of this Open Season was given in Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army. The FSM retired on 1 May 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003913

    Original file (20090003913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 10 (Election under Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan [RSFPP]) of the DA Form 2339 shows that the applicant did not elect coverage under the RSFPP. Public Law 90-485, enacted on 13 August 1968, established the requirement that a Service Member must make an election for the RSFPP before completing 19 years of active duty service. Public Law 93-155, enacted on 16 November 1973, extended that SBP Open Season from 12 to 18 months effective 21 September 1972 to 20 March 1974.