Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001617
Original file (20110001617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001617 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military occupational specialty (MOS) be listed as 36K (Field Wireman) instead of 57E (Laundry and Bath Specialist) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

2.  He states his MOS was field wireman and not bath and laundry specialist.

3.  He provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s records show he enlisted into the Regular Army on                 5 November 1973.  He enlisted for MOS 36C (Lineman).  On 27 April 1976, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200.
3.  His "Statement for Enlistment" shows he enlisted for MOS 36C, a seven-week course.  As a perquisite for the course, he signed this statement on 5 November 1973, indicating he was aware that to qualify for enrollment in the 36C course, he must attend 36K training course for four weeks. 

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignment) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows his duty MOSs, principal duties, and units of assignment during his military service as follows:

* 9 November 1973, 09B (Basic Trainee), Basic Combat Training (BCT), Company A, 3rd Battalion, 3rd BCT Brigade
* 6 January 1974, 36K, Advanced Individual Training (AIT), E Company, 1st Battalion, 5th AIT Brigade
* 8 February 1974, 71B (Clerk Typist), AIT, D Company, 2nd Battalion, 5th AIT Brigade
* 9 March 1974 to 14 March 1974, absent without leave (AWOL)
* 20 April 1974 to 11 August 1974, AWOL to dropped from the rolls (DFR)
* 12 August 1974 to 2 February 1976, 57A (Duty Soldier) Company B, Personnel Confinement Facility (PCF) to AWOL and/or DFR
* 12 February 1976, 57E, Confinement/Trainee, Company B, PCF	

5.  There are no orders or documents in his available file that shows he completed the wireman course and was awarded MOS 36K.  Item 6 (MOS) of his DA Form 2-1 shows his MOS as 57E.

6.  Special Orders Number 80, dated 26 April 1976, show he was discharged effective on 27 April 1976.  The order lists his MOS as 57E.  Item 16a (Primary Specialty Number) of his DD Form 214 also lists his MOS as 57E.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations), establishes standardized procedures for the preparation and distribution of the DD Form 214.  The regulation states to list the latest primary specialty number and title in items 16a of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any to show he completed training and was awarded MOS 36K.  The evidence of record suggests that he was recycled from the 36K course to the 71B course and later went AWOL.  It appears he was subsequently DFR prior to completing any training course.  The evidence of record also suggests he performed duties as a laundry and bath specialist while assigned to the PCF and, therefore, he was awarded MOS 57E.  
2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001617





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001617



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001102

    Original file (20080001102.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, Item 35 (Current and Previous Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Records) shows he arrived at Fort Lee, Virginia, on 22 June 1979, and was enrolled in advanced individual training (AIT) for MOS 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist). He was reenrolled in MOS 57E, completed AIT training, and was awarded MOS 57E as his primary MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016692

    Original file (20140016692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) for his Guard service shows in Item 6 (Military Occupational Specialties) MOS 11B. However, he was informed by the battalion commander that he was assigned to the unit for service in his secondary MOS 11B. However, MAJ MJM does not indicate why he, as his platoon leader, did not recommend the applicant for the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge at the time prior to his departure from Company E. 5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015344

    Original file (20060015344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The iPERMS (Personnel Electronic Records Management System) records currently indicates the following: a. a grade of sergeant and date of rank of 8 June 2006; b. a PEBD of 27 June 1997; c. a last date of release from active duty of 20 April 2007; d. a primary MOS of 68Q (Pharmacy Specialist); and e. a secondary MOS of 92S (Shower/Laundry and Clothing Repair Specialist). Specifically, paragraph 16a(6) states that when an applicant, who had served in the grade of SGT or above, enlists but no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019613

    Original file (20110019613.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * His DOR is 9 September 1966, not 9 September 1967 * He was inducted on 25 or 26 May 1965, not 27 May 1966 * He was separated on 29 April 1969, not 6 April 1968 * Item 25 of his DD Form 214 should show he completed basic combat training (BCT) and advanced individual training (AIT) * He completed the 8-week Wireman course in 1965, not 1966 * Item 25 of his DD Form 214 should show he completed the 8-week Switchboard Course, 2-week Film Projection School, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005916

    Original file (20140005916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends the DD Form 214 be amended to delete the entry showing training completed at Fort Polk, and show the following training completed: * Basic Combat Training, US Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Ord,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064398C070421

    Original file (2001064398C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests correction of Item 16a (Primary Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B10R6" vice "MOS 11E10R6." EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003368

    Original file (20140003368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) ending on 21 November 1977 to show: * completion of advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Ord, CA * completion of the Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical (NBC) School in Korea * his signature and that of the officer authorized to sign the form 2. c. Item 26 shows formal in-service training courses completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214. d. Items 29 and 31 show the signatures of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009041

    Original file (20070009041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), Item 35 (Record of Assignments) shows, in pertinent part, that on 29 November 1975, the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 3rd Brigade, Fort Ord, California, in duty military occupational specialty code (MOSC) 09B0O for the purpose of attending BCT. On 8 April 1975, the colonel serving as Commander, School Brigade, U.S. Army Signal School, Fort Gordon, Georgia, approved the separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014292

    Original file (20130014292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000880

    Original file (20130000880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his first MOS was MOS 11B and then he was trained in MOS 36K. The available evidence does not show he successfully completed AIT in MOS 11B or that he was awarded or served in MOS 11B. His DD Form 214 correctly shows his MOS as 36K, which is the MOS he held at the time of release from active duty.