Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001056
Original file (20110001056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001056 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, granting of an exception to policy to the Post 9/11 G.I. Bill that will allow him to transfer his educational benefits to his family members. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that on 8 July 2010 he originally requested that his son receive his GI Bill benefits utilizing the mandated website; however, an error occurred in his transaction and his son has been denied his benefits.  Due to reasons that are not apparent his transaction did not go through and he has made numerous attempts to correct the error to no avail.

3.  The applicant provides a one-page letter explaining his application and a copy of his son’s dependent identification card.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is serving in the United States Army Reserve, pay grade E-7; he was issued his 20-year letter on 10 February 2011.  At the time he contends he submitted his request to transfer his benefits he was serving in military occupational specialty (MOS) 25B (Information Technology Specialist).

2.  In the processing of this application a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Headquarters, Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, which opines that the applicant is not entitled to relief because the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program is based on legal authority outlined in law and information publicized well in advance of the implementation date of 1 August 2009.  Individuals had to be serving on active duty at the time or as a member of the Selected Reserve at the time benefits were transferred and there is no record of such a transfer being made.  The officials opined that there was no evidence to show the applicant attempted to transfer his benefits before his eligible son turned 23 years of age (21 August 2010).  The Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website shows no action was taken to transfer any benefits. 

3.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and to date no response has been received by the staff of the Board.

4.  Public Law 110-252, Section 3319, dated 22 June 2008, authorized the transfer of unused educational benefits to family members.  The law provided, in effect, that the Secretary of Defense would prescribe the implementation of the program.  It also provided that eligible participants must be serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.

5.  On 22 June 2009, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense released Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003: Post 9/11 GI Bill, which announced that effective 1 August 2009, individuals serving in the armed forces could affect a transfer of the GI Bill benefits.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he completed a transfer of his benefits on 8 July 2010 is not in question, the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record are not sufficient to support his claim.  

2.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001056



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001056



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000336

    Original file (20150000336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the date of his transfer of education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents as 31 July 2012. For those individuals who had an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, no additional service was required. Military Personnel Message Number 13-102, dated 15 April 2013, subject: Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB 4-Year Service Obligation for Approved...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000172

    Original file (20150000172.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post -9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement, and in fact, he attempted to transfer his education benefits in the TEB website on 21 July 2010. His retirement date was 31 August 2010. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant properly completed and submitted his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009747

    Original file (20130009747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Department will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active service individuals pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, document accordingly, and maintain record for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029341

    Original file (20100029341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to transfer his education benefits to his dependents before he retired from active duty on 27 August 2010. The applicant’s contentions have been noted; however, according to the applicable law and regulation he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. He was retired on 27 August 2010 and he did not transfer his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004484

    Original file (20120004484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to the Post-9/11 GI Bill that will allow him to transfer his education benefits to his family members. Individuals had to be serving on active duty at the time benefits were transferred and there is no record of such a transfer being made, of his attempting to make such a transfer, or being given false information by a reliable source about the rules of transferring education benefits. While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011642

    Original file (20110011642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have been eligible to transfer the benefit if he transferred before he left the service. If the applicant transferred his benefits prior to leaving military service he would have not incurred an additional service obligation because he had more than 34 years of service as of 1 August 2009. f. a Soldier must have no adverse action flag and have an honorable discharge to transfer benefits. There is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence which shows he transferred his Post...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012606

    Original file (20140012606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer education benefits to his dependent child under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant requests that he be allowed to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependent son. Since there is no evidence that shows the applicant attempted to transfer the benefit while in an active status, as required by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016027

    Original file (20100016027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9-11 GI Bill to his family members. The applicant attests that he submitted his application for transfer of educational benefits through the TEB website and after receiving no response, he contacted the Army G-1 Post 9-11 GI Bill section, who told him they did not have his application and since he had retired, he was ineligible to transfer his benefits. However there is no evidence of record and he did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006854

    Original file (20120006854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 23 years of service upon his transfer from the Selected Reserve to the Retired Reserve, so he was eligible to transfer benefits to either his spouse or children if he completed the request before leaving military service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits by law because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019250

    Original file (20100019250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He requested and was approved to transfer 3 months of benefits on the TEB website, for his son who was attending college, while he was still on active duty. The applicant's request that his record be corrected to show he applied for and the Army approved transferring his benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents prior to his retirement from active duty on 30 September 2009 has been carefully considered and found to have merit. Contrary to the basis for the denial...