Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004484
Original file (20120004484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  18 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004484 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to the Post-9/11 GI Bill that will allow him to transfer his education benefits to his family members.
 
2.  The applicant states that in 2009 he changed his Montgomery GI Bill to the Post-9/11 GI Bill solely for the purpose of transferring it to his family members.  He goes on to state he went to the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website and made the transfer prior to his retirement on 1 June 2010.  He goes on to state now that it is time to use the benefits he is being told by the TEB website he is not eligible to transfer the benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 February 1988.  He completed his training and he remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the rank/grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8 on 1 June 2006.

2.  On 31 May 2010, he was retired by reason of sufficient service for retirement and he was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 June 2010.  He completed 22 years, 3 months, and 15 days of creditable active service.


3.  In the processing of this case, on 11 April 2012, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from Headquarters, Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1.  The advisory official opines that the applicant is not entitled to relief because the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program is based on legal authority outlined in law and information on the program was publicized well in advance of the implementation date of 1 August 2009.  Individuals had to be serving on active duty at the time benefits were transferred and there is no record of such a transfer being made, of his attempting to make such a transfer, or being  given false information by a reliable source about the rules of transferring education benefits.  

4.  On 12 April 2012, the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  On 25 April 2012, he responded to the effect that he met with an education counselor on 7 October 2009 and she assisted him in making the transfer.  On
9 October 2009, he again met with the education counselor and they logged in again and saw that his request had been approved and at that time he allocated his benefits to his family members.  He continues by stating that he did not think to make a screen shot of the approval because he was being assisted by an education professional and it was only 2 weeks outside of the 90-day implementation phase.  He further states he is providing two documents to show he was indeed counseled.

5.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, dated 22 June 2008, authorized the transfer of unused education benefits to family members.  The law provided that the Secretary of Defense would prescribe the implementation of the program.  It also provided that eligible participants must be serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.

6.  On 22 June 2009, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense released Directive-Type Memorandum 09-003 – Post-9/11 GI Bill that announced that individuals serving in the Armed Forces could affect a transfer of the GI Bill benefits effective 1 August 2009.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted.  However, according to the applicable law and regulation, he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program.  He retired from the Army on 31 May 2010 and there is no record of his transferring his educational benefits prior to his retirement.  Unfortunately, there are no provisions in the law for retroactive eligibility that will allow him to transfer his benefits to his family members.
2.  Additionally, the Departments of the Army, Defense, and Veterans Affairs initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  Information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of entitlements was published well in advance of its implementation.

3.  While the applicant has provided documents showing he received his education counseling, they do not establish that he made application for the transfer of his benefits on the TEB database.  

4.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he completed a transfer of his benefits prior to retiring is not in question, the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record does not support his claim.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004484



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004484



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019250

    Original file (20100019250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He requested and was approved to transfer 3 months of benefits on the TEB website, for his son who was attending college, while he was still on active duty. The applicant's request that his record be corrected to show he applied for and the Army approved transferring his benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents prior to his retirement from active duty on 30 September 2009 has been carefully considered and found to have merit. Contrary to the basis for the denial...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017960

    Original file (20100017960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Senator's (Maryland) Letter, dated 1 June 2010 * U. S. Army G-1, email correspondence, dated 7 July 2010 * Transfer of Post 9/11 GI-Bill Benefits to Dependents (TEB) extract from the VA website * Eligibility requirements for transferring benefits handout * Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Policy Quick Reference * Submitting a Request to Transfer Benefits * Eligibility Requirements for transferring benefits * DVA TEB Program Information * The Post 9-11 Veterans Educational Assistance Acto of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016561

    Original file (20110016561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. b. the applicant is eligible to transfer benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB Program to his family members because he left the service within 90 days of the implementation of the program. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct his record to reflect he applied to transfer his education benefits...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002356

    Original file (20120002356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * he submitted the transfer of benefits on 8 June 2011 via the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) TEB website and upon submission, the website indicated his submission was in accordance with the instructions; therefore, he did not print a copy of his submission * after waiting for several months, he was informed by the TEB that there was no record of his submission; he contacted multiple agencies in an effort to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004202

    Original file (20140004202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer his unused education benefits to his family members under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The website did not provide any indication that he submitted a request to transfer his benefits. There is insufficient evidence that shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer the education benefits to his family member(s) while on active duty and/or in the Selected Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023142

    Original file (20110023142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 MGIB. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016484

    Original file (20130016484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he transferred his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his children prior to his retirement. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of the FSM's record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. In the absence of evidence indicating the FSM was unfairly deprived of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004177

    Original file (20130004177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests entitlement to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant requests entitlement to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The available evidence shows he was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement but did not do so prior to his retirement on 31 October 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009145

    Original file (20120009145.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He would have been eligible to transfer the education benefit if he had transferred them before he left active service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019543

    Original file (20110019543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval of transfer of educational benefits (TEB) under the Post 9/11 GI Bill to his dependents. He is not eligible to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. Therefore, the applicant was not in an active status on 1 August 2009 and is not eligible to transfer his education benefits to his family members under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.