Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000649
Original file (20110000649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110000649 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to consolidate his two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) into one document.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged upon completion of Officer Candidate School.  He was then commissioned and immediately ordered to active duty the next day.  This effectively resulted in a single period of active duty, not two as the current DD Forms 214 indicate.  The applicant contends that he is denied Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits because of the multiple DD Forms 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his two DD Forms 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 3 July 1984, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

3.  In July 1985, the applicant completed Officer Candidate School.  He was subsequently discharged on 25 July 1985 for the purpose of accepting a commission.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 July 1985 reports that he completed 1 year and 23  days of creditable active duty service.  The characterization of his service was honorable.  The narrative reason for his discharge was to accept a commission in the U.S. Army.

5.  Orders 63-1-A-253, Headquarters, U.S. Army Infantry Center, Fort Benning, Georgia, dated 20 May 1985, ordered the applicant to active duty in the rank of second lieutenant effective 26 July 1985 for a period of 3 years.

6.  On 26 July 1985, the applicant was appointed as an infantry second 
lieutenant/pay grade O-1 for an indefinite term.

7.  On 30 June 1987, the applicant was released from active duty due to miscellaneous reasons.  His DD Form 214 ending this date indicates he attained the rank of first lieutenant/pay grade O-2.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 5 days of net active service during this period and 1 year and 23 days of prior active service.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The DD Form 214 is not intended to have any legal effect on the termination of a Soldier's service.  A DD Form 214 will be prepared for enlisted members who become commissioned or warrant officers and have their enlisted status terminated.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to consolidate his two DD Forms 214 because he is being denied VA benefits.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant completed 1 year and 23 days of active duty service in an enlisted status.  During this period he completed Officer Candidate School.  He was subsequently discharged as an enlisted Soldier for the purpose of accepting a commission in the U.S. Army.  By regulation, a DD Form 214 for this period of enlisted service was prepared.

3.  The day following his discharge as an enlisted Soldier, the applicant was commissioned as a second lieutenant and ordered to active duty for a period of 3 years.  On 30 June 1987, he was released from active duty.  By regulation, a DD Form 214 was prepared for this period of commissioned officer service.

4.  The applicant's two DD Forms 214 accurately reflect the circumstances of his service.  The regulatory provisions governing the preparation of DD Forms 214 do not provide for consolidating multiple periods of active duty service into a single DD Form 214.

5.  In this case, there is no error or injustice.  Therefore, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000649



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000649



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021005

    Original file (20120021005.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Bronze Star Medal and Afghanistan Campaign Medal * overseas combat service 2. His DD Form 214 currently shows he was awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal with two campaign stars indicating he participated in two campaigns. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017253

    Original file (20100017253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 6 February 2010, to add: * a Letter of Appreciation dated 12 August 1985 * the First Gold Wreath Award for Excellent in Recruiting * a Letter of Appreciation dated 30 April 1985 * the Navy Pistol Expert Medal, dated 12 September 1987 * sharpshooter qualification rating * Naval Aviation Officer Candidate School military education * his Navy primary specialty * Student Naval Flight...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005445

    Original file (20090005445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the home of record (HOR) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the period ending 25 May 2009 be changed from Fort Bragg, North Carolina (NC) to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (PA). His DD Form 214 for that period of service shows his HOR as Pittsburgh, PA. 2. The applicant’s orders appointing him as a second lieutenant and his Officer Record Brief are accepted as sufficient evidence to show that Pittsburgh, PA is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025302

    Original file (20100025302.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of two Bronze Star Medals, one Army Commendation Medal, and completion of the Special Forces Medical Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Candidate course. Therefore, he is entitled to three bronze service stars for wear on his already already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show the three bronze service stars. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018903

    Original file (20080018903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available evidence shows that a DD Form 214 should have been prepared for the applicant for his active duty service performed prior to his commissioning. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the United States Army Infantry School prepared a DD Form 214 for the applicant for the period 30 June 2005 through 14 December 2005, just as it would have for all other officer candidate school graduates upon their commissioning. However, since the applicant does...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015375

    Original file (20110015375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He then completed a second period of active service as a commissioned officer and he was honorably released from active duty on 16 October 1953 in the grade/rank as 2LT/O-1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding the FSM the Ranger Tab * adding to Item 27 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 October 1953 the: * Parachutist Badge * Ranger Tab * issuing the FSM an Honorable Discharge Certificate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004375

    Original file (20150004375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 ending on 27 February 2007 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * Listing of Iraq/Afghanistan Campaign Medals and designated phases * TDRL retirement orders * PDRL retirement orders * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * 2005 mobilization orders * 2007 release from active duty orders COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004211

    Original file (20070004211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. In support of his request, the applicant submits an addendum to his DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, dated 28 March 2006; a copy of a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 10 February 2006; a copy of a Memorandum from the Commander, Headquarters, United States Army Infantry School, dated 7 February 2006; a copy of a DA Form 3822-R, Report of Mental Status Evaluation, dated 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005559C070206

    Original file (20050005559C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army and served on active duty in that status for the period from 18 June 1965 through 15 May 1967. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022647

    Original file (20100022647.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was an infantry officer who had served with an infantry company in the RVN where he had engaged the enemy in combat as an infantry platoon leader. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b....