Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022647
Original file (20100022647.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100022647 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

The applicant defers to counsel. 

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Counsel requests correction of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  Counsel states the applicant received the CIB prior to his discharge but it was never entered on his DD Form 214.  The applicant states he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and he actively engaged the enemy in ground combat.  He further states he received the CIB prior to his discharge; however, he never received any orders and it was never documented in his DD Form 214.

3.  Counsel provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 


justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 4 November 1968, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed basic combat training and he was enrolled in the Officer Candidate School for training as an infantry officer.

3.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) indicates that Special Orders Number 351, Fort Lewis, WA, awarded him the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

4.  On 29 October 1969, the applicant was discharged for the purpose of accepting a commission as an infantry officer.  He had attained the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5, and he had completed 11 months and 26 days of creditable active service.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214, for the period ending 29 October 1969, shows the National Defense Service Medal and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).

6.  On 30 October 1969, the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant (2LT)/O-1, Infantry Corps, U.S. Army Reserve, with concurrent call to active duty.

7.  On 27 November 1970, the applicant was assigned as a platoon leader with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, located in the RVN.

8.  On 27 December 1970, the applicant was reassigned as a platoon leader with A Company, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment.

9.  A DA Form 67-6 (U.S. Army Officer Efficiency Report) for the period 24 April to 18 August 1971 evaluated the applicant's performance of duty as an infantry platoon leader in an infantry company.  The applicant's rater stated that the applicant was a proven infantry leader in a combat environment as part of an airmobile division engaged in combat operations.


10.  On 19 August 1971, the applicant departed the RVN en route to Fort Lewis for separation processing.

11.  On 22 August 1971, the applicant was released from active duty.  He had attained the rank/grade of first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2 and had completed 1 year, 
9 months, and 23 days of creditable active service as a commissioned officer.

12.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) his DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 August 1971 shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* RVN Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Vietnam Service Medal

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. 

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following two campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971)
* Consolidation I (1 July - 30 November 1971)

15.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  This publication shows that the 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 March through 9 October 1971 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 6, dated in 1974.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention, through his counsel, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the CIB was carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was an infantry officer who had served with an infantry company in the RVN where he had engaged the enemy in combat as an infantry platoon leader.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

3.  Records show the applicant participated in two campaign phases during his service in the RVN.  Therefore, he is entitled to two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and to correct his DD Form 214 to show these bronze service stars.

4.  Records show the applicant's unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this foreign unit award.

5.  Records show the applicant qualified as a sharpshooter with the M-14 rifle.  Therefore his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this marksmanship qualification badge.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal;


	b.  awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge for actions during the period 24 April through 18 August 1971; and

	c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022647



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022647



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010907

    Original file (20060010907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    X The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He states that during his service in the RVN, he served in combat as an infantry officer and feels he is entitled to award of the CIB. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by showing his entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 3 bronze service stars with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023913

    Original file (20110023913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021990

    Original file (20100021990.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for his qualifying period of honorable service from 28 May 1965 to 27 May 1968. The evidence of record in this case confirms that although the applicant served in duty MOS 11B during his RVN tour, he never held an infantry MOS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012307

    Original file (20080012307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record confirms the applicant earned the CIB while serving in the RVN, as evidenced by the CIB certificate on file in his MPRJ, which is supported by entries on his DA Form 20. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add the CIB and all awards earned by the applicant during his military service to the list of awards contained on his final separation document at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004103C070206

    Original file (20050004103C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides award recommendations for the awards in question from senior medic who served with him in the RVN. In this case, the evidence of record includes no indication that the applicant was ever wounded/injured in action, or that he was ever treated for a combat related wound/injury. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021050

    Original file (20100021050.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 22 April 1971 to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Records show he was wounded as a result of hostile action on a combat operation while assigned to C Company, 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry while serving as an infantryman in an infantry MOS position. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014900

    Original file (20110014900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    * He held MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) and 11F (Infantry Operations and Intelligence Specialist) * He was a squad leader with the 57th Infantry Platoon, 108th Light Infantry Brigade and a platoon sergeant in the 4th Infantry Division * The Americal Division awarded him a second CIB c. The applicant served a subsequent tour of duty in the RVN from September 1970 to May 1971. The applicant contends he should be awarded a third award of the combat infantryman badge for combat service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009921

    Original file (20100009921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record the applicant served in active ground combat during his tour in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and as a result concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, there is no indication he was ever assigned to an infantry staff headquarters or to non-infantry duties during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, and given his unit regularly participated in combat operations and was cited...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004699

    Original file (20090004699.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 September 1968 through 29 September 1971, and to add it to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005320C071029

    Original file (20070005320C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 September 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070005320 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that...