Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000146
Original file (20110000146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110000146 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states:

* item 22c shows 1 year, 14 months, and 42 days
* this needs to be corrected to show the correct number of years, months, and days
* there are only 12 months in a year and 30 days in a month

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 January 1969 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 63C (general vehicle repairman).

3.  Headquarters, 3d Armored Division, General Orders Number 657, dated 17 December 1971, show he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious service for the period 6 October 1970 to 2 January 1972 in U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) [2 January 1972 appears to be his projected release from active duty (REFRAD) date].

4.  Headquarters, 3d Armored Division, General Orders Number 684, dated 22 December 1971, show he received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  Special Orders Number 358, dated 24 December 1971, show he was REFRAD from Fort Dix, NJ, and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.

6.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 22c – "USAREUR" and "1  14  42 [1 year, 14 months, and 42 days]"
* item 30 (Remarks) – "RVN [Republic of Vietnam] 4AUG69-3AUG70 [4 August 1969-3 August 1970, a total of 1 year]"

7.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is not available.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Item 22c of his DD Form 214 is clearly incorrect.

2.  The entry in item 30 of his DD Form 214 that shows he served in Vietnam for 1 year from 4 August 1969 to 3 August 1970 is accepted as sufficient evidence with which to amend item 22c of his DD Form 214.

3.  His ARCOM orders indicate he served in USAREUR from 6 October 1970 to 2 January 1972.  However, since he was REFRAD from Fort Dix, NJ, on 24 December 1971, it appears the end date for this award is incorrect.  It is reasonable to presume he departed USAREUR on 23 December 1971 for separation processing since 3d Armored Division orders show he was in USAREUR on 22 December 1971.  The total length of service for the period 6 October 1970 through 23 December 1971 is 1 year, 2 months, and 18 days.

4.  Based on the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct item 22c of his DD Form 214 to show he served a total of 2 years, 2 months, and 18 days of foreign service.

BOARD VOTE:

__X_____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry "1  14  42" from item 22c of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry "2  2  18."



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000146



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000146



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018732

    Original file (20130018732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states the FSM served overseas for a period of 1 year and 4 months, mainly in Vietnam. There is no evidence in his service records and the applicant did not provide any substantiating evidence that he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003765

    Original file (20120003765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show he completed 7 months and 17 days of foreign service in USAREUR. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in: * Item 17c (Date of Entry) – 17 September 1971 * Item 11d (Effective Date) of separation – 16 November 1972 * Item 22b (Total Active Service) – 1 year and 2 months * Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) – 7 months and 17 days 5. During his period of active service he served in USAREUR from 29 March 1972 through 14 November 1972 for a period of 7 months and 17 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025779

    Original file (20100025779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his: * rank/pay grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 * effective date of discharge as 21 October 1972 * Vietnam service 2. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his: * rank/grade from PV2/E-2 to SP4/E-4 * date of separation as 21 October 1972 * service in Vietnam 2. Based on the available evidence of record, there are no apparent errors on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011286

    Original file (20140011286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    From 1951 to 1962, item 24 of the DD Form 214 in effect at the time showed the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214. b. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007622

    Original file (20120007622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or discharge) to show his service in Vietnam as well as the: * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Aircraft Crewmember Badge 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Based on his Vietnam service he is entitled...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018915

    Original file (20130018915.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 11 May 1972 to show award of the: * Drill Sergeant Identification Badge instead of "DI Badge" * Valorous Unit Award 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each credited campaign. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021325

    Original file (20120021325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record he was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of service from 6 May 1969 through 6 February 1971. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022316

    Original file (20110022316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. d. DD Form 214 for the period 15 December 1968 through 30 September 1972 which shows in item 22c completion of 1 year of foreign service and in item 30 (Remarks) the entry "Vietnam - Yes 1 October 1970 to 30 September 1971." As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003087

    Original file (20110003087.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 and military record does not contain any evidence to show he ever served in Europe. It states that the following will be entered in the items indicated: a. item 22c include the total active duty service outside the continental limits for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007434

    Original file (20090007434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he served 2 years in Vietnam; however, his DD Form 214 reflects only 1 year and 6 days of foreign service in block 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service). The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...