Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022316
Original file (20110022316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022316 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he completed two tours in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states he served in Vietnam from 1966 to 1967 and again from 1970 to 1971. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge4) for the period ending 30 September 1972
* DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the U.S. Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 14 December 1953
* Various medical documents and reports

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 

substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 December 1953.  He served through multiple reenlistments in a variety of stateside and/or overseas assignments.  He retired on 30 September 1972 and he was placed on the retired list in his retired rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 on 1 October 1972.

3.  He completed the following periods of foreign service:

* Army Forces in the Far East (including Korea), 28 May 1952 to 8 November 1953
* Germany, 28 May 1959 to 21 January 1963
* Vietnam, on or about 11 July 1966 to 16 August 1967
* Vietnam, 1 October 1970 to 30 September 1971

4.  He was issued various separation documents as follows:

	a.  DD Form 214 for the period 15 March 1951 through 14 December 1953 which shows in item 26 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) completion of 1 year, 5 months, and 10 days of foreign service.

	b.  DD Form 214 for the period 15 December 1956 through 14 December 1962 which shows in item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) completion of
3 years, 6 months, and 17 days of foreign service.

	c.  DD Form 214 for the period 15 December 1962 through 14 December 1968 which shows in item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) completion of 1 year and 28 days of foreign service in Europe and the Pacific.

	d.  DD Form 214 for the period 15 December 1968 through 30 September 1972 which shows in item 22c completion of 1 year of foreign service and in item 30 (Remarks) the entry "Vietnam - Yes 1 October 1970 to 30 September 1971."

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of military service.  Chapter 2 contained guidance on the preparation of the 

DD Form 214 and stated that item 26, 24c, or 22c (depending on the year issued) would show the total period of active service outside of continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed, e.g., USAREUR [U.S. Army Europe], USARPAC, etc.  Furthermore, the "Remarks" block was/is used for Department of the Army mandatory requirements when a separate block was required for a continuation entry.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed 1 year and 28 days of foreign service in Vietnam from on or about 11 July 1966 to 16 August 1967:

	a.  His contemporaneous DD Form 214 that covered the period of service 15 December 1962 to 14 December 1968 credited him with 1 year and 28 days of foreign service in item 22c.  

	b.  The regulation in effect at the time mandated an entry of the last overseas theater in which the Soldier served - USARPAC in the applicant's case.  It is unclear why Europe is listed as part of his foreign service during this period.  

	c.  As required by the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show the correct last overseas command.  Additionally, there is no harm to the Army or the Soldier if his foreign service in Vietnam from 11 July 1966 to 16 August 1967 is shown in item 30 of his DD Form 214 for this period.

2.  The applicant served again in Vietnam from 1 October 1970 to 30 September 1971. 

	a.  His contemporaneous DD Form 214 that covered the period of service 15 December 1969 to 30 September 1972 credited him with 1 year of foreign service in item 22c.  

	b.  Again, the regulation in effect at the time mandated an entry of the last overseas theater in which the Soldier served - USARPAC in the applicant's case. It is unclear why the last overseas command is omitted as part of his foreign service during this period.  

	c.  As required by the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show the last overseas command.  

3.  Although he is entitled to administrative corrections of two of his DD Forms 214, there is no provision to consolidate those forms.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* Deleting from item 22c of his DD Form 214 ending on 14 December 1968 the entry "EUR & PAC" and adding the entry "USARPAC"
* Adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 December 1968 the entry "Service in Vietnam from 11 July 1966 to 16 August 1967"
* Adding to item 22c of his DD Form 214 for the period ending
30 September 1972 the entry "USARPAC"



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022316



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022316



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016228

    Original file (20140016228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 indicates overseas service but does not show he served in Vietnam. Although it was not until March 1972 that change number 15 to Army Regulation 635-5 authorized an entry on the DD Form 214 to indicate Indochina and Korea service on or after 5 August 1964, there is no harm in adding his service in the RVN during the period 7 May 1967 through 3 December 1968 to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003957

    Original file (20090003957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), reviewed on 2 June 1970 and audited 30 October 1973; Headquarters, U.S. Army Support Element, Military Region 1 (Vietnam), General Orders Number 148, dated 4 July 1972; DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 26 October 1969; and DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 17 May 1974. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011881

    Original file (20110011881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant's third tour in the Republic of Vietnam is not properly documented on his separation DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 December 1971; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this foreign service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018148

    Original file (20080018148.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 20 June 1966 for 4 years. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his DD Form 214, dated 25 November 1969, item 22c, should be corrected to show a credit of 2 years, 4 months, and 26 days foreign service and USARPAC/Korea should be entered to correctly show the last theater and country in which the applicant served. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020186

    Original file (20100020186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his service in Vietnam with the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, the unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, for service from 6 to 23 November 1967 based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 5, dated 1979; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011067

    Original file (20090011067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 January 1973 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 11d (Effective Date) shows the entry "26 Aug 69"; c. Item 22 (Statement of Service) shows the following entries: (1) Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows "3 1 0"; (2) Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows "0 6 15"; (3) Item 22a(3) (Total) shows "3 7 15"; (4) Item 22b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018789

    Original file (20130018789.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty from the USAR and entered active duty on 13 August 1966. Item 17c of the DD Form 214 shows he entered on active duty on 13 August 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 17c of his DD Form 214 the entry 13 August 1968 and replacing it with the entry 13 August 1966 * adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103

    Original file (20130002103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016229

    Original file (20100016229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 does not show any service in Vietnam. Paragraph 1-31c(11) states an award for previous marksmanship weapons qualification is revoked automatically whenever an individual, upon completion of firing a record course for which the previous award was made, has not attained the same qualification. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027243

    Original file (20100027243.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his undesirable discharge (UD) to a general discharge (GD) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following statement to item...