Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003765
Original file (20120003765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  1 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003765 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all of his creditable active service, including his foreign service of 7 months and 17 days.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, item 22b (Statement of Service – Total Active Service) does not include his foreign service of 7 months and 17 days shown in item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service).  He adds that he is a federal government retiree and his annuity is not being properly computed because of this error.  He retired from a DOD agency in 2009 after completing 29 years and 2 months of Federal service.  He noticed his active duty service and foreign service were not properly tabulated.  This affects his entitlement to benefits.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 September 1971 for a period of 3 years.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 72B (Communications Center Specialist).

3.  Subsequent to completion of MOS training, he was reassigned to the U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) on 29 March 2972 as a communications center specialist.  He served in USAREUR until 14 November 1972, at which time he departed USAREUR en route to Fort Dix, NJ for separation processing.  Records show he completed 7 months and 17 days of foreign service in USAREUR.

4.  On 16 November 1972, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations-Discharge-Unfitness and Unsuitability) by reason of unsuitability with a general discharge.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in:

* Item 17c (Date of Entry) – 17 September 1971
* Item 11d (Effective Date) of separation – 16 November 1972
* Item 22b (Total Active Service) – 1 year and 2 months
* Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) – 7 months and 17 days

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It states for:

* Item 11d, enter the date separation is accomplished
* Item 17c, enter the date entered on active duty
* Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period), enter the total service completed between items 11d and 17c
* Item 22a(2) (Other Service), enter all prior service excluding that shown in item 22a(1)
* Item 22b, enter the total active service completed beginning with the earliest period of active service up to and including current period of active duty
* Item 22c, enter the total active duty outside of the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests his foreign service period of 7 months and 17 days be added to his total creditable active duty service of 1 year and 2 months, which would give him 1 year, 9 months, and 17 days of total service.

2.  The applicant entered active duty on 17 September 1971 and he was discharged on 16 November 1972.  The total active service completed between his date of entry and separation date equates to 1 year and 2 months of total active service.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 accurately reflects this service.

3.  During his period of active service he served in USAREUR from 29 March 1972 through 14 November 1972 for a period of 7 months and 17 days.  This period of foreign service is within his entrance and separation dates and, therefore, inclusive in his 1 year and 2 months of total active service.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  __x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________x_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003765



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003765



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022164

    Original file (20100022164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he entered active service on 27 November 1964 instead of 27 November 1965. His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 11d (Effective Date) the entry 26 November 1967 * item 16 the entry 26 November 1971 * item 17c the entry 27 November 1965 6. Based on the correction to the applicant's date of entry, his net service during the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000265

    Original file (20110000265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. It further stated: a. item 22a(1) would show the total service between dates shown in items 10c or 17c and 11d of the DD Form 214, as represented by continual and foreign service, less time lost; b. item 22a(2) would show all prior service excluding any service shown in item 22a(1); c. item 22a(3) is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011067

    Original file (20090011067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 January 1973 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 11d (Effective Date) shows the entry "26 Aug 69"; c. Item 22 (Statement of Service) shows the following entries: (1) Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows "3 1 0"; (2) Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows "0 6 15"; (3) Item 22a(3) (Total) shows "3 7 15"; (4) Item 22b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024991

    Original file (20100024991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, he requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) by showing: * his date of birth as 4 November 1949 * his entry date on active duty as 7 July 1969 * his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) * any and all military awards to which he is entitled 2. Therefore, Item 24 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003597

    Original file (20090003597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed a total of 3 years, 9 months, and 29 days of active duty service from 23 February 1966 through 4 December 1969, as reflected in item 22a(1) of his DD Form 214. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 22b to reflect this total period of active military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016583

    Original file (20080016583.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows that he entered active duty on 20 January 1973, and that his military records show that he actually entered active duty on 20 January 1971. The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) on 20 January 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012190

    Original file (20080012190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 17c, of his DD Form 214, has a strikeover and item 22a(1), 22a(3), and 22b show the incorrect years of service. Item 17c, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry "9 Sep 66" (9 September 1966), which is correct; however, as indicated by the applicant, does contain a "strikeover." Item 22a(1) will be completed by entering the total service completed in item 10c (Dated Inducted) or 17c (Date of Entry) and 11d (Effective Date) of the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013625

    Original file (20100013625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he completed 3 months and 6 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He was inducted on 10 February 1970 and was honorably discharged on 18 November 1970. Therefore, he completed 9 months and 2 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He enlisted on 19 November 1970 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019693

    Original file (20110019693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005975C070206

    Original file (20050005975C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the correct spelling of his last name, date of entry, discharge date, and date of birth. Although the applicant contends that he was discharged in September 1971, his discharge orders show he was discharged effective 26 August 1971 which is properly reflected in item 11d on his DD Form 214. Since the evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted on 29 January 1971 and was discharged on 26...