Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020358
Original file (20130020358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  12 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130020358 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the mother of a former service member (FSM), requests change of the FSM's uncharacterized discharge to honorable.

2.  The applicant states the FSM informed his sergeant that he was moving.  He then reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a unit in Decorah, IA.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the FSM's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment),  Certificate of Death, and a State of Minnesota Affidavit for Collection of Personal Property.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 9 April 1996, the FSM enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) of the United States for a period of 8 years and in the Minnesota ARNG for a period of 6 years.

2.  The FSM's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty for training (ADT) on
7 August 1996.  He was released from ADT on 21 November 1996 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4 (Completion of Required Active Service).  Item 24 (Character of Service) shows the entry "uncharacterized."  It also shows he:

   a.  was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewmember);

	b.  completed 3 months and 15 days of net active service this period; and

	c.  was transferred to the control of his ARNG unit.

3.  Department of Military Affairs, Office of the Adjutant General, Saint Paul, MN Orders 306-817, dated 2 November 1998, discharged the applicant from the ARNG, effective 20 July 1998, and transferred him to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training).

4.  A DA Form 4836 shows, on 3 April 2004, the applicant extended the period of his enlistment to a period of 8 years and 6 months and established his expiration of term of service as 8 October 2004.  At the time, he was assigned to Company B, 389th Engineer Combat Battalion (Heavy), Decorah, IA.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 3 (Character of Service/Description of Service), paragraph 3-7a, states, in part, the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted.

	b.  Section II (Terms) of the glossary states that entry-level status for Reserve Soldiers begins upon enlistment in the USAR/ARNG and, for Soldiers ordered to ADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records show the FSM was ordered to ADT on 7 August 1996 and he was released from ADT on 21 November 1996.  He completed 3 months and 15 days of active service.  He was in an entry-level status when he was released from ADT.

2.  The regulatory guidance states an entry-level status Soldier's separation will be "uncharacterized."

3.  Records show the FSM's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, based on completion of required active service was administratively correct and in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time.  In addition, the character of service entered in item 24 of his DD Form 214 was proper and correct.

4.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service.  It merely means the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.  

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020358



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020358



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030310

    Original file (20100030310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests the characterization of her husband's active service for initial active duty for training (IADT), completed on 17 September 1992, be changed to honorable. Because the FSM was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board determined that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010359

    Original file (20130010359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of release from ADT shows he completed 2 months and 23 days of active service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003408

    Original file (20140003408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable vice uncharacterized. The DD Form 214 she was issued shows she was released from ADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service with an uncharacterized character of service. The DD Form 214 provides a record of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008030

    Original file (20090008030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); Headquarters, 2nd Troop, 104th Aviation Battalion, Annville, PA, memorandum, dated 9 December 1995; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Military Affairs, The Adjutant General, Annville, PA, Orders 025-012, dated 6 February 1996; NGB Form 22 (Report of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001858

    Original file (20120001858.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he received an honorable instead of an uncharacterized characterization of service. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days. Aside from his ADT from September June to August 1996 for which a DD Form 214 was issued, there...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008695

    Original file (AR20130008695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 13 November 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130008695 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Presiding Officer I certify that herein...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018121

    Original file (20130018121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his character of service as honorable vice uncharacterized. It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The DD Form 214 provides a record of a Soldier's active Army service at the time of release from active duty and does not reflect subsequent service in the ARNG or USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007531

    Original file (20100007531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. The applicant's records show that she enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 16 March 1989 for a period of 8 years. Upon completion of her training, the applicant was released from active duty for training (ADT) on 22 February 1990 to her Minnesota ARNG (MNARNG) unit to complete her military service obligation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017814

    Original file (20130017814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 4 December 1986 be corrected to show his service was honorable instead of Entry Level Status (ELS). The applicant states: a. in order to buy back the time shown on the DD Form 214 in question, his character of service must be listed as honorable; and b. it is possible that Army National Guard (ARNG) and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldiers did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028718

    Original file (20100028718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable," "under honorable conditions," or "general" rather than "uncharacterized." It specifies that "Soldiers of the ARNG and the USAR ordered to active duty for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from active duty, revert to control of the appropriate Reserve Component" and that the "service of Soldiers specified in this...