Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029358
Original file (20100029358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    14 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100029358 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he served with the 17th Cavalry, 173rd Airborne Brigade in the Republic of Vietnam and he should have been awarded the CIB.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 June 1969 for a period of
3 years.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 52B (Power Generation Equipment Operator).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 26 May 1970 to 25 May 1971.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to HHC, 173rd Airborne Brigade from 31 May 1970 through 20 January 1971, performing duties in MOS 52B as a power generation equipment operator.  It further shows he was assigned to Troop E, 17th Cavalry from 21 January to
21 April 1971; however, the duty MOS and principal duty title for this period is blank.

4.  On 18 January 1972, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 2 years, 6 months, and 22 days of total active service.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

6.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 also stated that criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and that the Combat Infantryman Badge was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, “the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for 
undergoing the hazards of day to day combat.”  This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry officers, to enlisted personnel, and to warrant officers who had an infantry specialty/military occupational specialty and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's claim of entitlement to the CIB was carefully considered.  However, by regulation, in order to qualify for award of the CIB there must be evidence not only that the member held and served in an infantry military occupational specialty with a qualifying infantry unit, but also that he was present and personally participated with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  In this case, there is no evidence he met any of the three qualifying factors for the CIB.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029358



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029358



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017635

    Original file (20090017635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His personnel records do not contain orders which show he was awarded the CIB. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded MOS 11B and served in this MOS while performing the duties of a squad leader with the 173rd Airborne Brigade during his tour in Vietnam. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018778

    Original file (20100018778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS in a qualifying infantry unit for a short period; however, it also shows he served as a scout observer and switchboard operator, neither of which is listed as a position authorizing award of the CIB in the RVN. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017008

    Original file (20100017008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded MOS 52B and not an infantryman MOS. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088422C070403

    Original file (2003088422C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this medal for each campaign a member participated in during his assignment tenure in the RVN. By regulation, there are three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and must actively participate in such...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005358

    Original file (20120005358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel, Constituent Services, Office of Congressman C____ C____ of Minnesota, states: * the applicant was awarded the CIB while assigned to a cavalry unit serving in the Republic of Vietnam * there was no discussion or conclusion related to a photograph he submitted showing the CIB on his fatigue uniform * a reasonable conclusion would be that a young Soldier serving in Vietnam for more than a year while assigned to a cavalry unit as a light weapons infantryman would be engaged in combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002588

    Original file (20140002588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows he served in duty specialty 1981 (rotary wing aviation unit commander) in Vietnam while assigned to: * Troop D, 3d Squadron, 5th Cavalry Regiment, from 9 May 1970 to 31 January 1971 * Troop C, 3d Squadron, 17th Cavalry Regiment, from 1 February 1971 to 27 April 1971 4. However, the governing regulation for award of the CIB clearly establishes that the CIB may be awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005991

    Original file (20130005991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the CIB, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and Republic of Vietnam Civil...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007852

    Original file (20070007852.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was trained as an infantryman and served in the Republic of Vietnam in an infantry unit. The applicant submitted an undated self-authored statement testifying to his personal engagement in active duty ground combat against the enemy in the Republic of Vietnam, which was not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, it is considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020197

    Original file (20110020197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record shows he held an administrative MOS and served with his infantry battalion as a clerk typist. There is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS or that he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry duty, in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. Regretfully, in the absence of conclusive evidence that the applicant held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014201

    Original file (20130014201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 20 January 1970 through 11 December 1970. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), for the period 30 June 1969 through 17 December 1971, and to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 30 June 1969 through 17 December 1971; and b. Amending his DD Form 214 to delete the Vietnam Service...