Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018778
Original file (20100018778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018778 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the CIB based on his infantry service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement and an 11B (Infantry) Course attendance memorandum in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 July 1969 and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 05B (Radio Operator).  It further shows he was awarded secondary MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) on 22 December 1970.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 22 September 1970 through 21 September 1971.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour of duty he was assigned to the following units performing the duties identified for the periods indicated:

	a.  Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade, performing duties in MOS 05B as a switchboard operator between 17 November 1970 and 7 January 1971;

	b.  Company E, 3rd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade, performing duties in MOS 11B as a scout observer between 8 January 1971 and 17 March 1971;

	c.  HHC, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade, performing duties in MOS 11B as a scout observer between 18 March 1971 and 21 May 1971.

4.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not include the CIB in the earned awards listed.  The applicant last audited this record on 13 December 1971.  His record is also void of any documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty.

5.  On 1 February 1972, the applicant was honorably released from active duty in the rank of specialist four/E-4 after completing 2 years, 6 months, and 3 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960)

6.  The applicant provides a memorandum that shows he was scheduled to attend the 13 December 1970 11B Course at the Brigade Jungle School, Cha Rang, RVN.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 8-2 provides guidance on award of the CIB.  It states in order to qualify for the CIB a member must hold an infantry MOS; serve in an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size; and must have been present and participated with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  Combat service and campaign participation alone does not satisfy this requirement.

8.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided  theater policy for awards.  Appendix 3 to annex A listed positions eligible for the CIB in paragraph 3b.  Scout observer and radio telephone operator not assigned the primary duty of accompanying infantry units on tactical operations were not included in this list.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected to show he was awarded the CIB based on his infantry service in the RVN has been carefully considered.  However, by regulation, in order to receive the CIB a member must not only be performing infantry duties in a qualifying infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, there must be evidence that he was present with his qualifying unit and participated while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.

2.  The evidence shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS in a qualifying infantry unit for a short period; however, it also shows he served as a scout observer and switchboard operator, neither of which is listed as a position authorizing award of the CIB in the RVN.

3.  Further, there is no evidence the applicant was present and participated with his qualifying infantry unit while performing infantry duties while the unit was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  As a result, the regulatory criteria necessary to support award of the CIB has not been satisfied in this case.  Therefore, in the absence of official orders awarding him the CIB, it would not be appropriate or serve the interest of all those who served in the RVN and who faced similar circumstances to correct his record to show award of the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018778



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018778



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021617

    Original file (20100021617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows that during his assignment to 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade, his unit received the following awards: * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 5 May 1965 to 26 September 1970, by Department of the Army General Orders Number 51, dated 1971 * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 15 April 1969 to 16 March 1971, by Department of the Army General Orders Number 5, dated 1973 13. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088422C070403

    Original file (2003088422C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this medal for each campaign a member participated in during his assignment tenure in the RVN. By regulation, there are three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and must actively participate in such...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003479C070205

    Original file (20060003479C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he never received the CIB for his service with the 173rd Airborne Brigade from March 1970 to February 1971. The evidence of record shows the applicant served as a cook in duty MOS 94B with the 3rd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade in Vietnam from 16 March 1970 to 28 February 1971. There is no evidence of record which shows he held an infantry MOS while assigned to the 173rd Airborne Brigade during combat in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014201

    Original file (20130014201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 20 January 1970 through 11 December 1970. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), for the period 30 June 1969 through 17 December 1971, and to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 30 June 1969 through 17 December 1971; and b. Amending his DD Form 214 to delete the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085100C070212

    Original file (2003085100C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member participated in while serving in the RVN. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that in addition to those awards already listed on his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057952C070420

    Original file (2001057952C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for the period 5 May 1965-4 May 1967 by Department of the Army General Order Number 48, dated 1968. The applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device by General Orders Number 691, Headquarters, 173 rd Airborne Brigade (Separate), dated 24 April 1967; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001489

    Original file (20120001489.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he would like to be awarded the PH for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 7 December 1967 as a result of a stepping on a punji stick for which he was treated in the RVN, and on 7 November 1970 as a result of receiving a gunshot wound to the back which resulted in his medical evacuation to the United States for treatment at Fort Polk, Louisiana. The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows, in item 31 (Foreign Service), that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016028

    Original file (20080016028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board further determined that the applicant was not awarded SMOS 11F until 13 October 1969, subsequent to his RVN service, and that his record failed to show he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM with “V” Device for Valor. The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014455

    Original file (20100014455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served in duty MOS 94A (Cook Helper) or 94B throughout his military service; it does not show any entries for service in an infantry duty MOS. His records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. Notwithstanding his and his former platoon sergeants' sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that...