Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028923
Original file (20100028923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    14 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028923 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was released from active duty on 6 October 1970 instead of 4 October 1970.

2.  The applicant states he was still in Vietnam on 5 October 1970.

3.  The applicant provides:

* his DD Form 214
* Special Orders Number 277, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Oakland, CA, dated 4 October 1970

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 November 1968.  He completed initial entry training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 12B (combat engineer).  The highest rank/grade he attained was sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

3.  Special Orders Number 277, dated 4 October 1970, released the applicant from active duty effective 4 October 1970.

4.  The Transfer or Discharge Data section of the DD Form 214 he was issued upon his release from active duty shows he was honorably released from active duty effective 4 October 1970 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation.  This form shows he completed a 1 year and 11 months of total active service.

5.  Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 contains an entry showing he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 6 October 1969 to 5 October 1970.

6.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 shows his service in Vietnam as 6 October 1969 through 5 October 1970.  The 5 October 1970 entry is a pencil entry.

7.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he was en route to the Continental United States (CONUS) on 2 October 1970.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  It states for item 11d, enter the date separation is accomplished.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows in the remarks section that he served in Vietnam during the period 6 October 1969 to 5 October 1970.  It is presumed that these dates were taken from the entry in item 31 of his DA Form 20.  His Vietnam service ending date was a pencil (temporary) entry which would have been his projected tour ending date which was typically a 1-year tour.

2.  Item 38 of his DA Form 20 shows he was en route to CONUS on 2 October 1970.  Special Orders Number 277 and his DD Form 214 show the effective date of his release from active duty as 4 October 1970.  As such, it appears the 


effective date of his release from active duty is correct as shown and that his period of Vietnam service shown in item 30 of his DD Form 214 is in error.  Since it appears there is no error in the date he was separated from active duty, there is no basis for correcting his DD Form 214 to show he was separated on
6 October 1970.

3.  Additionally, it has long been an unwritten policy of the ABCMR not to make an applicant worse off than when he/she applied to this Board.  Therefore, the ABCMR will not correct Item 30 of his DD form 214 to show that his service in Vietnam ended earlier than that currently shown.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028923



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028923



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017638

    Original file (20110017638.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * one bronze service star to his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal * Valorous Unit Award * his service dates in the Republic of Vietnam as 17 March 1968 through 11 April 1969 rather than through 11 March 1969 2. The applicant states: * the records from the National Personnel Records (NPRC) and his recollection are correct * he served in Vietnam for 1 year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028749

    Original file (20100028749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100028749 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Korea from 1960 to 1962. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 11 months, and 19 days of creditable active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023931

    Original file (20100023931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant has two DD Forms 214. The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period 1 December 1969 through 19 July 1972 shows he served: * 8 months and 18 days of other service (USAR DEP and prior RA service) * 2 years, 7 months, and 19 days of active service during the current period * 2 years and 12 days of foreign service (Vietnam and Germany) * in Vietnam from 1 December 1969 through 26 September 1970 10. There are no errors concerning the dates of entry and the Vietnam service on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002782

    Original file (20140002782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 October 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002782 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he completed 2 years and 2 months of foreign service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting block 22c on the DD Form 214 to show 2 years, 2 months and 1 day.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021187

    Original file (20100021187.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 22 (MOS) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: Type Code Title Date PMOS 91A Medical Corpsman 24 Apr 1970 PMOS 91B Medical Specialist 16 Sep 1970 4. The applicant's contention that he was a 91B Medic instead of a 91E2O Medic with a related civilian occupation and DOT number of Dental Assistant 079.378 was carefully considered and found to have merit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002956

    Original file (20120002956.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct period of service in Vietnam. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service): Vietnam from 7 January 1970 to 20 February 1971; and b. item 38 (Record of Assignments): (1) he was assigned to the 403rd Transportation Company, U.S. Army, Pacific (USARPAC), from 12 January 1970...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027412

    Original file (20100027412.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the proper amount of time he served in the Republic of Vietnam. He states his record is in error because it does not show the Purple Heart he received while in Vietnam. This period of time is reflected in item 24c of his DD Form 214 and he has not provided any evidence showing this period is in error.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013994

    Original file (20090013994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 and MOS orders in his record confirms he was trained in and awarded MOS 70A upon completion of AIT at Fort Dix, in August 1969. In this case, there is no evidence supporting a conclusion a formal hearing is necessary to satisfy the interest of justice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008777

    Original file (20140008777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows his service in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) but does not show the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) requires. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021055

    Original file (20120021055.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 25, dated 8 June 2001, shows the 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry was cited for award of the VUA for extraordinary heroism during the period 30 January to 31 January 1968. This pamphlet shows the units to which the applicant was assigned were cited for award of the: * Presidential Unit Citation for the period 6 November through 23 November 1967 by DAGO Number 42, dated 1969 (4th Battalion, 503d Infantry) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross...