Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008777
Original file (20140008777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  22 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008777 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Vietnam by adding the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows his service in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) but does not show the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) requires.  The VA will not acknowledge his Vietnam service unless his DD Form 214 is corrected.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 6 September 1966, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 91A (Medical Corpsman).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

* item 31 (Foreign Service) – on or about 5 March 1968 he departed the continental United States (CONUS) en route to Vietnam 
* item 38 (Record of Assignments) – he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with the 566th Medical Company (Ambulance) from 23 March to 21 August 1968
* item 38 – on 22 August 1968, he was in a casual status for return to CONUS

4.  On 26 August 1968, he was honorably released from active duty.  Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 shows he had served in USARPAC for 5 months and 21 days.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the VSM but does not show the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Individuals who qualified for award of the VSM and served in Vietnam for less than 6 months were also entitled to award of the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) if they met one of the following conditions:

* wounded as a result of hostile action 
* captured by hostile forces but later escaped or were rescued or released
* killed in action or otherwise in line of duty

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation did not provide for an entry on the DD Form 214 specifying an individual had served in Vietnam.  It stated for item 22c to enter the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed, e.g., USARPAC.

7.  An interim change to Army Regulation 635-5, dated 15 December 1971, stated to indicate Indochina and Korea service on or after 5 August 1964 in item 30 (Remarks) of the DD Form 214 by entering inclusive dates of service for Vietnam and indicating "Yes" or No" for service in Indochina and Korea.  To show Vietnam service only, e.g., enter "Vietnam – 25 Apr 71 thru 28 May 71, Indochina – Yes, Korea – No."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded the VSM, but he did not serve in Vietnam for the period required to be eligible for the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  Further, there is no evidence that he met the eligibility criteria applicable to Soldiers who had been awarded the VSM and served in Vietnam for less than 6 months.  Therefore, there is no basis for correcting his record to show the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

2.  When the applicant was released from active duty, the regulation governing preparation of the DD Form 214 did not require an entry specifying service in Vietnam, but it did require entry of the last overseas theater in which service was performed in item 22c.  His foreign service assigned to USARPAC is properly entered in item 22c of his DD Form 214. 

3.  A later revision of the regulation governing preparation of the DD Form 214 provided for recording Vietnam service in the Remarks section of the form.  Based on the information recorded on his DA Form 20, it is reasonable to conclude that he served in Vietnam from 23 March to 22 August 1968.  There would be no harm in adding an entry to item 30 of his DD Form 214 showing he served in Vietnam during this period.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 30 of this DD Form 214 the entry "Vietnam – 23 March thru 22 August 1968, Indochina – Yes, Korea – No."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960).



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008777





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008777



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150013483

    Original file (20150013483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and all awards to which he is entitled. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 22c of his DD Form 214 the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024767

    Original file (20110024767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 29 (Qualification in Arms) that he qualified as Marksman with the M-14 rifle and as Sharpshooter with the M-16 rifle * item 31 (Foreign Service) that he was credited with service in Vietnam from 10 January to on or about 15 September 1968 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with Battery C, 3d Battalion, 34th Artillery, 9th Infantry Division, U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC), from 21 January to 13...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023036

    Original file (20110023036.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: a. in item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 11 July 1966 to 4 July 1967; b. in item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to the 736th Medical Detachment (Military Provincial Health Assistance Program) and attached to the U.S. Military Assistance Command Vietnam (MACV), U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC), from 16 July 1966 to 3 July 1967; and c. in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) he was authorized the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015147

    Original file (20110015147.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states the "Vietnam Campaign Ribbon" is not shown on his DD Form 214 and the form does not show he served in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214: * VSM with one silver service star * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016228

    Original file (20140016228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 indicates overseas service but does not show he served in Vietnam. Although it was not until March 1972 that change number 15 to Army Regulation 635-5 authorized an entry on the DD Form 214 to indicate Indochina and Korea service on or after 5 August 1964, there is no harm in adding his service in the RVN during the period 7 May 1967 through 3 December 1968 to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002020

    Original file (20110002020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows the applicant served in Vietnam from 2 February 1968 to 1 February 1970. Although it was not until March 1972 that Change Number 15 to Army Regulation 635-5 authorized an entry on the DD Form 214 to indicate Indochina and Korea service on or after 5 August 1964, there is no harm in adding his Vietnam service during the period 2 February 1968 to 1 February 1970 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014030

    Original file (20140014030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    GO Number 1905, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam on 27 May 1969, awarded him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service from June 1968 to June 1969. The evidence of record shows he participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows: a. adding the entry "USARPAC" to item 22c; b. adding to item 24: * Bronze Star...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003016

    Original file (20110003016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) he served in USARPAC for 2 months and 20 days * item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Parachute Badge * item 30 (Remarks) no entry documenting his service in Vietnam 8. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011653

    Original file (20080011653.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Further, the applicant's RVN service awards are properly recorded in Item 24 of the DD Form 214. As a result, there is no evidence of any error or injustice related to the overseas service entries on the applicant's DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004727

    Original file (20120004727.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his foreign service in the RVN behind his awards was determined to be without merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 29 January 1965 to 5 November 1967; b. adding the entry "USARPAC" to item 22c of his DD Form 214; c. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of...