Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028483
Original file (20100028483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028483 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show Tank Operator vice 62J (General Construction Machine Operator).

2.  The applicant does not make any statements.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and one page from his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 January 1968.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  Special Orders Number 110, issued by Headquarters, 15th Support Brigade, Fort Lewis, WA, dated 8 May 1970, awarded him the secondary MOS (SMOS) of 62J.

4.  Special Orders Number 124, issued by the same headquarters, dated 26 May 1970, promoted him to the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 in the MOS of 62J.  As a result, his PMOS of 11B and SMOS of 62J was withdrawn and he was awarded PMOS 62J.

5.  Special Orders Number 19, issued by the same headquarters, dated 26 January 1971, reassigned him to the transfer point for separation processing.  His MOS is shown as 62J.

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 12 February 1971 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 27 days of creditable active service.

7.  Item 23a of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the entry "62J, General Construction Machine Operator."

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  In item 23a enter the PMOS code number and title.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded PMOS 62J on 26 May 1970 and he held this MOS through his separation date of 12 February 1971.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  As such, his DD Form 214 correctly reflects his MOS as 62J, General Construction Machine Operator.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028483



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028483



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009247

    Original file (20140009247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he is a Vietnam veteran * he served with the 101st Airborne Division * his BSM is not listed on his DD Form 214 * his secondary MOS (SMOS) of 71B (Clerk-Typist) is on his DD Form 214, but his PMOS of 11B is not listed * he believes that he is entitled to the CIB * there may be other division citations that are not listed on his DD Form 214 3. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015689

    Original file (20130015689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 22 (MOS's) the entries: (1) secondary (S), 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), 5 November 1970; and (2) primary (P), 94B, (Cook) 6 September 1971. b. item 27 (Military Education) the entry Light Weapons Infantryman, 11B, Fort Polk, LA, 9 weeks, 1970. c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he served as an 11B Rifleman from 27 January 1971 through 6 September 1971 and as a 94B Cook from 7 September 1971 through 7 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007747

    Original file (20140007747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded MOS 94B (Cook) on or about 27 November 1970. With respect to the rank/grade, the evidence of records shows the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on 6 September 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017672

    Original file (20090017672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Army did not correct its records to show his PMOS was 11B4P. While the applicant received awards for his Infantry service in the Republic of Vietnam to include the CIB, the orders were issued awarding these individual decorations showing the applicant's MOS as 11B at the time of the award. The evidence of record does not support correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his PMOS was 11B4P at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002024

    Original file (20140002024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), was assigned to Company D, 52nd Infantry Regiment, held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B1O (Rifleman), and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in – * item 22 (MOS) – * Primary MOS (PMOS) 76P2O, Stock Control Specialist, 23 April 1971 * Secondary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002441

    Original file (20130002441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 05B45 as his PMOS; however, the evidence of record shows he held MOS 05B4S as his PMOS. Special orders awarded him MOS 05B2S based on his successful completion of the Special Forces Qualification Course. The evidence of record shows he completed the infantry MOS course during AIT; therefore, it would be appropriate to amend item 25 of his DD Form 214 to show this completed course.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008514C070205

    Original file (20060008514C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he earned the MOS of 95B and that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that he was a military policeman. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 28 September 1973, the date of his discharge. Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows he served as a military policeman, in MOS 95B4O, from 11 August 1971 to 9 July 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013994

    Original file (20090013994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 and MOS orders in his record confirms he was trained in and awarded MOS 70A upon completion of AIT at Fort Dix, in August 1969. In this case, there is no evidence supporting a conclusion a formal hearing is necessary to satisfy the interest of justice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080000750

    Original file (AR20080000750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 23a, of his DD Form 214, shows the entry, "91Q2O (Pharmacist)." Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 shows he served as a pharmacist, in MOS 91Q2O. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in MOS 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman, with a BS Degree in Pharmacy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023627

    Original file (20100023627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also contains separation orders issued by the United States Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, Washington on 30 June 1971 that lists his MOS as 71F in the standard name line. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he held MOS 71F on the date of separation. Given the applicant was properly awarded and held PMOS 71F on the date of his REFRAD it would not be appropriate to revoke this MOS or delete all references to it from the record and DD Form 214 as requested by the applicant.