Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080000750
Original file (AR20080000750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  10 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000750 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Joyce A. Wright

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. John T. Meixell

Chairperson

Mr. Chester A. Damian

Member

Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that item 23a (Specialty Number and Title), of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), be corrected to show his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) of 11B2O. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he would like his PMOS, of 11B2O added to his DD Form 214 in addition to his secondary MOS (SMOS), of 91Q2O, which does appear on his DD Form 214.  He states that his DD Form 214 should show both, his PMOS and SMOS correctly.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his certificate of training in support of his request. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 April 1968.  He successfully completed basic combat training and advanced individual training at Fort Dix, New Jersey.  On completion of training, he was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS), 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman.  

3.  The applicant provided a copy of a certificate of training which shows that he successfully completed the Army Training Program 7-11B and was awarded the PMOS of 11B1O, Light Weapons Infantryman, from Fort Dix, New Jersey. 

4.  Item 32 (Civilian Education), of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows he completed his Bachelor of Science (BS) Degree in Pharmacy, at the University of Buffalo, in New York, in 1967.

5.  On 17 October 1968, orders were published assigning the applicant to the 5th MD HSP GEN (Medical Hospital General). 

6.  Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties), of the applicant's DA Form 20, shows he was awarded the PMOS of 91Q2O, pharmacy specialist effective 7 November 1968.

7.  The applicant was promoted to specialist five (SP5/E-5) effective 17 October 1969, in MOS 91Q2O.

8.  The applicant continued to serve in MOS 91Q2O until he was honorably released from active duty on 1 May 1970.

9.  Item 23a, of his DD Form 214, shows the entry, "91Q2O (Pharmacist)."

10.  Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 shows he served as a pharmacist, in MOS 91Q2O.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It provided, in pertinent part, that the soldier's primary specialty number and title would be entered in item 23a of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in MOS 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman, with a BS Degree in Pharmacy.  He was awarded the PMOS of 11B1O and was later awarded the PMOS of 91Q2O, pharmacist.

2.  The evidence shows that he served in the PMOS of 91Q2O as a pharmacist, while assigned to the 5th General Hospital.  He was released from active duty in the PMOS of 91Q2O.  At the time of his release from active duty, his DD Form 214 was prepared to only show his PMOS of 91Q2O, which is shown in item 23a.

3.  According to regulation, the applicant’s PMOS of 11B should have been changed to his SMOS when he was awarded the PMOS of 91Q2O.  There is no evidence to show that orders were published showing a change.  




4.  Based on the information contained in the applicant's records, it is apparent that a clerical error occurred at the time of the applicant's reclassification.  The MOS 11B should have been redesignated as his SMOS.  Therefore it would be appropriate, as a matter of fairness and equity, to correct his DD Form 214 to show the MOS 11B2O (Light Weapons Infantryman) as his SMOS.  Since the regulation in effect at the time only required the Soldier's PMOS to be shown in item 23a, as a matter of equity, in this case, the applicant's SMOS 11B will be shown in item 30 (Remarks).  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__JTM __  __CAD__  __QAS__   GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the entry "SMOS 11B1O (Light Weapons Infantryman)" in item 30 (Remarks), of his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction of item 23a, of his DD Form 214, to show the entry "PMOS 11B2O (Light Weapons Infantryman)." 




___John T. Meixell    __
      CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017795

    Original file (20110017795.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record clearly shows he did not serve in PMOS 11C1O as shown in item 16a of his DD Form 214. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to correct item 16a of his DD Form 214 to show PMOS 11B1O and the evaluation score he received in that MOS (i.e., "none"). The evidence of record does not show, nor has the applicant provided evidence showing, he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007704

    Original file (20140007704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 23 (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United Report of Separation or Discharge). The applicant provides: * Separation Order * Amendment Order * DD Form 214 * EA Form 7 (Individual Training Record) * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was initially trained in and awarded PMOS 11B1O on 1 December 1967 and for most of his military service this was the only MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009247

    Original file (20140009247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he is a Vietnam veteran * he served with the 101st Airborne Division * his BSM is not listed on his DD Form 214 * his secondary MOS (SMOS) of 71B (Clerk-Typist) is on his DD Form 214, but his PMOS of 11B is not listed * he believes that he is entitled to the CIB * there may be other division citations that are not listed on his DD Form 214 3. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011979

    Original file (20110011979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. General orders awarded him the Air Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014738

    Original file (20090014738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 9 September 1969. With respect to his MOS, the evidence of record shows the applicant was trained in and held MOS 11B. There is no evidence in his service records and he did not provide any supporting evidence that shows he served in Germany and/or Norway.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013330

    Original file (20090013330.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The regulation in effect at the time provided, in pertinent part, that the PMOS code number and title would be entered in item 23a on the DD Form 214. ____________X__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015689

    Original file (20130015689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 22 (MOS's) the entries: (1) secondary (S), 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), 5 November 1970; and (2) primary (P), 94B, (Cook) 6 September 1971. b. item 27 (Military Education) the entry Light Weapons Infantryman, 11B, Fort Polk, LA, 9 weeks, 1970. c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he served as an 11B Rifleman from 27 January 1971 through 6 September 1971 and as a 94B Cook from 7 September 1971 through 7 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002441

    Original file (20130002441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 05B45 as his PMOS; however, the evidence of record shows he held MOS 05B4S as his PMOS. Special orders awarded him MOS 05B2S based on his successful completion of the Special Forces Qualification Course. The evidence of record shows he completed the infantry MOS course during AIT; therefore, it would be appropriate to amend item 25 of his DD Form 214 to show this completed course.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001598

    Original file (20090001598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, in the absence of orders awarding the applicant MOS 11B as his PMOS or some other substantiating evidence, there is insufficient evidence to support correction of the applicant’s separation orders and final DD Form 214, particularly in view of the evidence below. While the evidence of record indicates that the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit and he may have performed the duties of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017672

    Original file (20090017672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Army did not correct its records to show his PMOS was 11B4P. While the applicant received awards for his Infantry service in the Republic of Vietnam to include the CIB, the orders were issued awarding these individual decorations showing the applicant's MOS as 11B at the time of the award. The evidence of record does not support correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his PMOS was 11B4P at the time of separation.