Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026267
Original file (20100026267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  21 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026267 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) to show he was discharged from the U.S. Army in the rank of specialist four.

2.  The applicant states his discharge certificate should show he was discharged from the Regular Army, not the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), and his rank as specialist four.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 256A, dated 30 June 1972.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 1 July 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years and obligated himself to a 6-year commitment in the USAR.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 62E (Tractor Operator).

3.  On 30 November 1967, the applicant departed Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, for duty in the Republic of Vietnam.

4.  On 1 February 1968, the applicant was assigned to the 497th Engineer Company as an equipment operator.

5.  Unit Orders Number 108, 497th Engineer Company, reduced the applicant from specialist four/pay grade E-4 to private first class/pay grade E-3 due to misconduct.

6.  On 1 February 1969, the applicant departed the Republic of Vietnam and returned to Fort Lewis, Washington.

7.  Special Orders Number 32, Fort Lewis, Washington, dated 1 February 1969, released the applicant from active duty in the rank of private first class/pay grade E-3.  He completed 2 years, 7 months, and 2 days of creditable active duty service.  He was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

8.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows:

	a.  he was a private first class at the time of his release from active duty and

	b.  he was transferred to the USAR with a termination date of his Reserve obligation of 30 June 1972.

9.  The DD Form 256A provided by the applicant shows he was discharged from the USAR on 30 June 1972 in the rank of private first class.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 256A should be corrected to show he was discharged from the Regular Army in the rank of specialist four.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was released from active duty as a private first class and transferred to the USAR.  There is no evidence showing he was ever advanced to specialist four while a member of the USAR.

3.  Furthermore, he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 30 June 1972 upon completion of his 6-year Reserve obligation as evidenced by his DD Form 256A.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026267



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026267



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020402

    Original file (20090020402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was released from active duty as a SP4, E-4 but his discharge certificate shows his rank and pay grade as private first class (PFC), E-3. The applicant states he was released from active duty as a SP4 but his discharge certificate shows his rank and pay grade as PFC. _________x__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003163

    Original file (20130003163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct service number and date of entry on active duty; and b. DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) to show his correct rank and date of discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 23 November 1966 for 6 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013123

    Original file (20100013123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009618

    Original file (20090009618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Installation Clearance Record, dated 12 April 1972, on file in his service personnel record shows the applicant's rank and pay grade as specialist four, E-4. Item 5a of his DD Form 214 shows the applicant was released from active duty in the rank of private first class. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for correction to his DD Form 214 to show he was released from active duty in the rank and pay grade of specialist four, E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012721

    Original file (20080012721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 September 1968 and was honorably separated from active duty as a CPL on 25 April 1970. Upon completion of his military service obligation on 16 September 1974, he was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of SP4. However, there is no evidence to show he served as a CPL and, in September 1977, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017552

    Original file (20070017552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available evidence further shows that he received nonjudicial punishment and was reduced in rank and pay grade to Private, E-1. On the date the applicant was released from active duty, he was serving in the rank and pay grade, Private, E-2; however, his DD Form 214 was prepared to show he was serving in the rank and pay grade, Private First Class, E-3. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to correctly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014659

    Original file (20140014659.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214, effective date 11 April 1971 * DD Form 256A, dated 8 June 1976 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Records show the applicant was not promoted to SP4 until 1 April 1972, after his discharge from active duty on 11 April 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011383

    Original file (20090011383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Standby) to show his date of discharge as 5 January 1972 and his rank as specialist five (SP5)/pay grade E-5. The applicant's military records contain a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) which shows he enlisted in the USAR Control Group (Delayed) on 6 January 1966. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024066

    Original file (20100024066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DD Form 1351-2, dated 22 April 1982, as provided by the applicant, indicates his pay grade at the time was E-4. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant held the rank of SP4 and pay grade E-4 at the time of his release from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show in item 4a and 4b his rank and pay grade as SP4 and E-4,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014160

    Original file (20090014160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document also shows the applicant's rank was SP4. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was REFRAD in the rank of SP4/E-4 with a DOR of 9 July 1972 because he held that rank when he was separated from active duty and also at the time he was discharged from the USAR. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the correct rank, grade, and DOR.