Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003163
Original file (20130003163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003163 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his:

	a.  DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct service number and date of entry on active duty; and

	b.  DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) to show his correct rank and date of discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

2.  The applicant states these errors were discovered when he applied for social security benefits.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and DD Form 256A.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Records show the applicant entered the USAR on 23 November 1966 for a period of 6 years.  He was given an eight-digit service number showing the number "1" in the 5th position.  His expiration term of service date was established as 22 November 1972.

3.  On 9 February 1967, the applicant was discharged from the USAR for the purpose of immediate enlistment in the Regular Army (RA).  He was issued a 
DD Form 256A showing his rank as a private, USAR.

4.  On 10 February 1967, the applicant enlisted in the RA for a period of 3 years.  He used the same service number as given him when he enlisted in the USAR.

5.  On 21 November 1967, the applicant was advanced to the rank of specialist four, pay grade E-4.

6.  On 9 February 1970, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:

	a.  in Item 2 (Service Number): "6" as the 5th digit; and

	b.  in item 17c (Date of Entry): 10 February 1970.

8.  Letter Orders Number 10-1430212, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated 18 October 1972, announced the applicant's discharge from the USAR effective 22 November 1972.  His rank at the time was specialist four, pay grade E-4.

9.  A DD Form 256A shows the applicant's rank as PVT (private) and that he was discharged on 9 February 1967.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as in effect at the time, provided detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provided that Item 2 would contain the Soldier's service number and Item 17c would contain the Soldier's date of entry on active duty.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 and DD Form 256A should be corrected to show his correct service number, rank, and dates of entry and discharge.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 23 November 1966 for 6 years.  He was subsequently discharged from the USAR on 9 February 1967 for the purpose of enlistment in the RA.  He was advanced to specialist four, pay grade E-4 on 21 November 1967.  On
9 February 1970, he was REFRAD and transferred to the USAR after completing
3 years of active duty service.  On 22 November 1972, he was again discharged from the USAR.

3.  Records further show the applicant served in both the USAR and the RA using a service number that showed the numeral "1" as the 5th digit.  However, his DD Form 214 reflects the numeral "6" as the 5th digit.  This error should be corrected.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 also indicated that he entered active duty on 
10 February 1970.  This is an obvious error because he was REFRAD on 
9 February 1970.  Therefore, his year of entry on active duty should be corrected to read 1967.

5.  The DD Form 256A, as provided by the applicant, correctly shows his status at the time he was discharged from the USAR for the purpose of enlisting in the RA.  However, it does not appear he was issued a DD Form 256A when he was subsequently discharged from the USAR in 1972.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to issue him this document now, showing his rank as specialist four, component USAR, and date of discharge as 22 November 1972.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing in Item 2 of his DD Form 214 the numeral "1" as the 5th digit;

	b.  showing in Item 17c of his DD Form 214 the date: 10 February 1967; and

	c.  issuing him a DD Form 256A showing he was discharged from the USAR on 22 November 1972 in the rank of specialist four.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003163



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003163



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026267

    Original file (20100026267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders Number 32, Fort Lewis, Washington, dated 1 February 1969, released the applicant from active duty in the rank of private first class/pay grade E-3. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was released from active duty as a private first class and transferred to the USAR. ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007230

    Original file (20130007230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 January 1970 to show in: a. item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of private (PV2)/E-2; b. item 16 (Terminal Date of Reserve), his terminal date as 22 September 1975 instead of 21 May 1975; c. item 17c (Date of Entry), he entered active duty on 22 September 1969 instead 10 September 1969; and d. item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023931

    Original file (20100023931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant has two DD Forms 214. The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period 1 December 1969 through 19 July 1972 shows he served: * 8 months and 18 days of other service (USAR DEP and prior RA service) * 2 years, 7 months, and 19 days of active service during the current period * 2 years and 12 days of foreign service (Vietnam and Germany) * in Vietnam from 1 December 1969 through 26 September 1970 10. There are no errors concerning the dates of entry and the Vietnam service on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004784

    Original file (20110004784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant's SSN during his active service was "xxx-xx-8xxx"; however, his DD Form 214 was issued with an incorrect SSN of "xxx-xx-0xxx." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 3 of his DD Form 214 the entry "xxx-xx-8xxx" and replacing it with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017297

    Original file (20130017297.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 May 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130017297 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing on his DD Form 214 his social security number as indicated on his DD Form 398; and b. issuing him a new DD Form 256A showing his honorable discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008219

    Original file (20150008219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SSN the applicant states is correct (xxx-xx-9176) was recorded in his records during his service. Therefore, item 17c of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his date of entry year as "66" vice "666." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows: * delete from item 3 the existing entry and add a similar entry but with the number "9" in the sixth digit * delete from item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021977

    Original file (20090021977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 January 1967, which is properly reflected on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 November 1967. Since the applicant was discharged from the USAR on 1 January 1973, almost 1 year after his release from active duty, there is no basis for amending item 11d of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003831

    Original file (20120003831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 March 1971 he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 due to conviction by civil authorities. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The applicant's overall record of service has been considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013123

    Original file (20100013123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015464

    Original file (20090015464.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct service number, period of service, the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, and award of the Purple Heart. The year of his date of entry is wrong because he entered service in 1965. c. He was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for heroism in Vietnam; however, the award is not correctly recorded on his separation document. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was...