Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011383
Original file (20090011383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		BOARD DATE:	  19 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011383 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Standby) to show his date of discharge as 5 January 1972 and his rank as specialist five (SP5)/pay grade E-5.

2.  The applicant states he was in basic training on the date currently shown on the DD Form 256A he provided.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DD Form 256A in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records contain a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) which shows he enlisted in the USAR Control Group (Delayed) on 6 January 1966.  His records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 April 1966.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of surface equipment specialist and was promoted through the ranks to pay grade E-5.

3.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 10 March 1969 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) after completing 2 years, 10 months, and 18 days of creditable active service.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows his rank as SP5/pay grade E-5.

4.  U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center (RCPAC) Letter Orders Number 12-1322648, dated 29 December 1971, show the applicant was discharged from the USAR Control Group (Standby) in the rank of SP5/pay grade E-5 effective 5 January 1972.

5.  Army Regulation 135-91 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements, and Enforcement Procedures) indicates that a statutory military service obligation (MSO) is incurred on initial entry into the Armed Forces whether by induction, enlistment, or appointment.  Prior to 1 June 1984, most Soldiers incurred a 
6-year statutory MSO.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), paragraph 2-10, prescribes that the DD Form 256A will be issued appropriately to all Soldiers receiving an honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Based on the applicant's enlistment date of 6 January 1966, RCPAC Letter Orders Number 12-1322648 show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR Control Group (Standby) on his terminal date of reserve obligation of 5 January 1972 in accordance with regulatory policy.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 and RCPAC Letter Orders Number 12-1322648 show his rank as SP5/E-5.  There is no evidence to show that he was subsequently assigned to a Reserve unit where a reduction in rank could have occurred.  As such, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 256A to show his rank as SP5/pay grade E-5 with a discharge date of 5 January 1972.

3.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records as shown below.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by re-issuing him a DD Form 256A with the rank and grade of SP5/E-5 and a discharge date of 5 January 1972.



      __________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011383



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011383



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053035C070420

    Original file (2001053035C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his retirement point account be corrected to show that he has 20 years qualifying for retired pay at age 60 and that he be provided retired pay. The applicant states, in effect, that he is credited with only 18 years qualifying for retired pay, but he served for 20 qualifying years. His retirement point account should then show a total of 19 years qualifying for retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017959

    Original file (20090017959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, in effect, states he was laterally appointed from the rank of SP5 to the rank of SGT on 5 October 1969. As documentary evidence in support of this application, the applicant provides copies of * special orders, dated 5 October 1969 * a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 26 March 1970 * letter orders, dated 22 March 1972 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 23 March 1972 CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014195

    Original file (20100014195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was not discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The orders stated he would be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (if eligible) within 1 year of the effective date of the order unless he provided an MSO election form requesting to remain in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged from active duty in 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001971

    Original file (20120001971.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the USAHRC-Fort Knox, Chief, Department of the Army Promotions, Special Actions, dated 23 March 2012, who stated that based on the information provided and a review of their records, the applicant's request for promotion to lieutenant colonel should be denied. Later that same year, USAHRC officials twice mailed an MSO election statement presumably to the applicant's "Redcoine Road" address; however, there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005787

    Original file (20120005787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 10 April 1974, Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, published Letter Orders Number 040378 transferring him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016225

    Original file (20080016225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was separated in pay grade E-5 vice pay grade E-4 (specialist 4 (SP4)). The applicant's record shows no evidence he was promoted to pay grade E-5 while he was serving on active duty. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 15 April 1969 while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016567

    Original file (20130016567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) records to show: * His active Reserve service * Promotion to Staff Sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * Change in his military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. His record contains a Promotion Recommendation and Board Report Form dated 8 August 1977 which listed his current rank as SP5 and shows he was recommended for promotion to SSG. The evidence of record shows he held no military status from 26 March 1971 to 3 October 1972 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001122C070205

    Original file (20060001122C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service, he was provided on his discharge shows his rank, pay grade, and date of rank to be: SP4/E-4/6 March 1969, the same rank, pay grade, and date of rank shown on his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 December 1969. These orders show the applicant was discharged in the rank/pay grade, Specialist Four/E-4. These items show the applicant's rank and pay grade on the date of his release from active duty was SP4, E4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014106

    Original file (20090014106.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090014106 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. AHRC Orders D-08-823125, dated 26 August 2008, show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 20 August 2008 for failing to make an MSO election. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant questioned his release from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and reassignment to the Standby Reserve (Inactive List) in August 2007 or his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012219

    Original file (20090012219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official stated that, due to the applicant having been transferred to the inactive list on 19 June 2007 and subsequently transferred back to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 15 August 2007, he was not on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) for one continuous year prior to the convening date of the 2007 DA Reserve Components Colonel AMEDD Selection Board. If selected for promotion, his orders to the Retired Reserve should be voided, his promotion effective date and...