Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016908
Original file (20140016908.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	2 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140016908


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM).   

2.  The applicant states there was an omission on his DD Form 214; it does not reflect the above awards.    

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.    

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 January 1963.  After completing military training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13A (Field Artillery Basic).  The highest rank/grade held was private first class/E-3.  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

     a.  he served in Germany from 3 December 1964 to on or about 25 December 1965;

     b.  he was assigned to Service Battery, 2d Battalion, 39th Field Artillery Regiment, U.S. Army, Europe; and 

     c.  he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of active service with the exception of a "good" efficiency rating for the period 14 December 1964 to on or about 29 December 1965.

4.  On 10 January 1966, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve, by reason of "early release overseas returnee," after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 26 days of total active service.  His DD Form 214 shows the following:

	a.  Item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) - he served 1 year and 8 days in U.S. Army, Europe. 

	b.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - he was awarded or authorized the "Marksman (Rifle M-14)."

5.  There are no orders or any other evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for the AGCM.

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated that:

     a.  The AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings (emphasis added).  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

     b.  The NDSM was awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, both dates inclusive, or after                 31 December 1960, and before a terminal date to be announced.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant request's for correction of his DD Form 214 to show the AGCM and the NDSM was carefully considered.

2.  His military service qualifies him for award of the NDSM; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, stated that to be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal a Soldier must have received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings except in the case of service school efficiency.  There was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.  

4.  His record shows he received a rating of "good" in efficiency while assigned to Service Battery, 2d Battalion, 39th Field Artillery Regiment during the period of    14 December 1964 to on or about 29 December 1965.  As a result, he did not meet the criteria necessary to support award of the AGCM prior to his separation.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214, for the period ending 10 January 1966, by adding the National Defense Service Medal.  

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending his DD Form 214 by adding the Army Good Conduct Medal. 



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015543



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140016908



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002656

    Original file (20120002656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 should be corrected to show this award. Although he is authorized to wear only one award, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 should be corrected to show two awards of this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020969

    Original file (20090020969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the AGCM for the period of 6 June 1963 to 3 June 1965 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st award) for the period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006494

    Original file (20120006494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also confirms the applicant completed a qualifying period of service in Korea for award of the KDSM. The NDSM is already recorded in the applicant's record and on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 24 September 1964 through 26 June 1967 and by adding the AGCM (1st Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005685

    Original file (20090005685.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was awarded the AM. Therefore, it would now be appropriate to award him the AGCM and correct his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 23 July 1964 to 21 July 1967; and c. adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006095

    Original file (20140006095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. There is no evidence of record and he failed to provide evidence showing the PUC was awarded to any of the units to which he was assigned. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021057

    Original file (20140021057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he received the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal (VCM) and any other awards he may have earned. Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the: * Republic of Korea from 17 July 1964 to 28 July 1965 * RVN from 20 October 1966 through 9 February 1967 4. c. Adding to his DD Form 214 the: * AGCM (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019837

    Original file (20100019837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. It would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000281

    Original file (20150000281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his duty assignment in Vietnam and any awards and decorations to which he may be entitled for his Vietnam service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021667

    Original file (20140021667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on his overall record of service, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 23 April 1962 through 22 April 1964 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. The applicant’s USMC records are not available for review; however, the applicable regulation, in effect at the time, made no provision to list awards receive outside the period covered by the DD Form 214. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026336

    Original file (20100026336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090004554 on 28 July 2009. The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 21 July 1961...