Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020444
Original file (20090020444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    3 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020444 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for injuries from shrapnel in his left knee and back from a mortar/rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) attack.  He describes the events leading up to a firefight with the enemy and states that after he parked his vehicle outside an airbase fence, he climbed on a tank and something exploded behind him.  He states he received pieces of scrap metal from the explosion in his left leg and back.  He further states that while he assisted with dropping dead Soldiers off at the hospital, the staff attempted to extract the metal out of his leg and back but it was embedded too deep.  He states he told his first sergeant that they had been hit and he told them not to worry about it.  He states these metal pieces are still there today.

3.  The applicant provides an X-ray report from the Mulberry Diagnostic Imaging Center, Montgomery, AL.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 


3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that after serving in the Army National Guard he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 February 1961.  He was awarded the military occupational specialties of UH-1 helicopter repairer and physical activities specialist.  The highest rank/grade he held was sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.

3.  The applicant was honorably retired on 31 October 1981 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired) by reason of required service for retirement.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed a total of 21 years, 2 months, and 4 days of creditable active service.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the periods 25 August 1967 to 24 August 1968 and 12 February to 29 December 1970.

5.  His DD Form 214 for the period 23 July 1965 through 22 April 1971 also shows he served in the RVN during that time.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart.

6.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

7.  The applicant provided an x-ray report, dated 17 November 2003, which indicates he has some "old shrapnel."

8.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any evidence which shows he was ever wounded or treated for wounds sustained as the result of hostile action.

9.  The applicant's records do not contain any evidence that indicates he was ever recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority while serving on active duty.


10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was injured by an explosion while he was on a tank following a firefight with the enemy and provides an x-ray report which indicates he has "old shrapnel."  However, there is no evidence in his available military personnel records nor any corroborating evidence which shows that he was wounded or injured (received this shrapnel) as a result of hostile action, that the wound required treatment by medical personnel, or that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

2.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

3.  In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for such wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.  As a result, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X___   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020444



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020444



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012856

    Original file (20110012856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The VA Rating Decision provided by the applicant is new evidence that should be considered by the Board. The original Record of Proceedings states: a. the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded; b. there was an absence of evidence showing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001134

    Original file (20090001134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 MARCH 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090001134 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that he was wounded by shrapnel during a mortar attack on 20 July 2006. However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025136

    Original file (20100025136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. Both the applicant and his former platoon sergeant state metal from a bullet ricocheted into the applicant's left jaw. In view of all of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support the applicant's claim to the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009932

    Original file (20090009932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded by shrapnel from enemy fire in Korea on 29 May 1953 and that at the time of receiving the wound, he told the medic or doctor that he did not want the Purple Heart for fear of a telegram going home to his wife. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006069

    Original file (20070006069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides an article titled the United States Army in the Korean War (South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu), a morning report dated 16 September 1950, and the Diagnostic Imaging Report, dated 16 June 2003 with an Addendum typed at the end of the report. In the original decision the ABCMR found that there were no medical records available which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Korea. There is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020029

    Original file (20100020029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for an injury received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant states he was injured during combat when "the guns on our duster exploded." Furthermore, there is no available evidence of record showing that he was injured or wounded while engaged in combat against an armed enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011571

    Original file (20120011571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, the eyewitness statement from the medic provided by the applicant indicates the medic treated the applicant during the period 9-15 July 1966. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022411

    Original file (20110022411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states after caring for the seriously injured point-man the applicant was treated by the field medic for what seemed to be cuts, abrasions, and minor shrapnel wounds. The applicant was injured but he would not go and get checked out by the medic. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that conclusively shows he was injured as a result of hostile action and treated for that injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012419

    Original file (20080012419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the applicant be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained as a result of enemy action when a North Korean grenade exploded and shrapnel was lodged in the applicant's head. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. c. There are no medical records to show the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008422

    Original file (20090008422.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 September 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008422 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the radiology report provided by the applicant is...