Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024784
Original file (20100024784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  26 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024784 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 June 1992 be corrected to show his basic training (BT). 

2.  He states, in effect, that he enlisted on 21 May 1991 under the Split Option Training Program (SOTP).  He attended BT from 5 June through 9 August 1991. However, his DD Form 214 does not reflect this period of training.  He states his DD Form 214 only gives him credit for AIT, which he attended from 10 June through 1 September 1992 and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist). 

3.  He provides a copy of his DD Form 214; a letter from the U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Jackson, SC; and a U.S. Army Training Certificate, dated 
8 August 1991.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 21 May 1991, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 8 years, and MOS 91B.

3.  Orders 099-001 issued by the Military Entrance Processing Station, Albuquerque, NM, dated 31 May 1991, show he was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) for approximately 9 weeks under the alternate SOTP effective 5 June 1991.

4.  On 9 August 1991, the U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Jackson, SC issued him a letter showing he completed BT during the period 5 June through 9 August 1991 while in a USAR status.  The letter was issued in lieu of a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report), in accordance with Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), paragraph 2-13e. 

5.  He was issued a DD Form 214 for active duty training (ADT) from 10 June to 1 September 1992 which was the second part of his SOTP.  Item 11 (Primary Specialty) shows the entry "91B10 MEDICAL SPECIALIST."  Item 23 (Type of Separation) shows the entry "RELEASED FROM ADT."

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active service and provides a brief, clear-cut record of active service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5, paragraph 12e, in effect at the time states that a 
DD Form 220 is issued upon completion of the BT portion for members enlisted under the USAR SOTP and the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) Alternate Training Program.  When a DD Form 220 is not available, provide the same data by letter.  The regulation further states that a DD Form 214 would be prepared for all personnel after completing IADT, which resulted in the award of an MOS, even though the active duty was less than 90 days.  This includes completion of AIT under the ARNGUS Alternate Training Program or USAR SOTP.  






DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect his BT.  However, the available evidence shows he enlisted in the USAR on 
21 May 1991, under the SOTP, which means his BT and AIT would be split.  On 
9 August 1991, he was issued a letter which shows he completed BT from
5 June to 9 August 1991.  He was later issued a DD Form 214 under the SOTP after completing AIT for the period 10 June to 1 September 1992.  

2.  In accordance with Army Regulation 635-5, he was properly issued a letter upon completion of BT under the SOTP.  When he completed AIT, he was awarded MOS 91B under the SOTP and he was issued a DD Form 214.  Therefore, it appears the applicant's service is correctly documented.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024784



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024784



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000887

    Original file (20100000887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the correct time in service and character of service. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was released from ADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of expiration term of service, with an uncharacterized character of service. The DD Form 214 will be prepared for selected Soldiers, among which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001467

    Original file (20110001467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She further requests correction of item 35 (Record of Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), to include: a. These orders show she was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 on 8 May 1987. The applicant also requested to add to item 35 of her DA Form 2-1 the dates she attended the scheduled UTAs, the 16 weeks she attended IADT, and the 3 days of ADT at Fort Gordon, GA. 7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511855C070209

    Original file (9511855C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active Duty) that he was on active duty from 18 March through 10 November 1993, and that his primary specialty was 91J10 (Physical Therapy Specialist). A DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record-Part II) indicates that the applicant attended and completed basic training during the period 9 January through 13 March 1992; that he attended and completed AIT during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010359

    Original file (20130010359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of release from ADT shows he completed 2 months and 23 days of active service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011525

    Original file (20090011525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form shows her last name as "C-------" and her first name as "J--------." This form shows her last name as "C------" and her first name as "J--------." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing the applicant a DD Form 214 that captures her period of ADT from 6 January 2008 through 19 January 2008 with an entry-level status characterization of service; and b. reissuing the applicant an Honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017141C070206

    Original file (20050017141C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 12a (Date entered AD This Period), of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 July 1987, to show the entry "1986 01 17" (17 January 1986). The applicant states, in effect, that his records reflect that he entered active duty (AD) on 23 June 1987; however, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009765

    Original file (20130009765.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-E (Bonus Addendums (ARNG) Annex E to DD Form 4 -- Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) Addendum - ARNG), dated 12 May 2009, wherein it shows he was enlisting on that date in the LAARNG critical skill MOS of 25U for a period of 6 years and an NPSEB of $10,000.00 under the Split-Training Option. The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request for entitlement to an NPSEB bonus, that the applicant be...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016068

    Original file (AR20070016068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26b(3), NGR 600-200, by reason of failure to meet medical procurement standards, with service uncharacterized. For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083807C070212

    Original file (2003083807C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available records contain the applicant’s enlistment contract and his pay records. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant completed advanced individual training (AIT) or was awarded a military occupational specialty (MOS). The applicant attended basic training from 20 June 1994 through 25 August 1994.