Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024673
Original file (20100024673.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024673 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the National Defense Service Medal and Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states the medals were not on his discharge at the time of his separation.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 December 1974 for a period of 3 years.  He served as a military police and was released from active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 3 years of creditable active service with no time lost.

3.  His DD Form 214 does not show the National Defense Service Medal or Good Conduct Medal as authorized awards.

4.  He received nonjudicial punishment in March 1976 for violating a lawful general regulation (by being inside a privately owned vehicle while in the fatigue uniform parked at a McDonald's restaurant).

5.  There are no orders for the Good Conduct Medal in the available records.

6.  There is no evidence he received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence he was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal.     

7.  A DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 4 October 1977, shows he was recommended for the Good Conduct Medal for the period 2 December 1974 to 
1 December 1977.  This form also states, in pertinent part, "If the commander recommends disapproval for awarding the GCMDL [Good Conduct Medal], an entry will be made in item 27 DA Form 2-1, IAW AR [in accordance with Army Regulation] 640-2-1."  

8.  Item 27 (Remarks) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows the entry "Character of Svc [service] Honorable."

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 
27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.  Second and subsequent awards of the National Defense Service Medal are denoted by a bronze service star affixed to the National Defense Service Medal.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He did not serve a period of qualifying service for award of the National Defense Service Medal.

2.  He was released from active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 3 years of honorable active service with no time lost.  Since his character of service was honorable and the commander did not recommend disapproval for awarding the Good Conduct Medal (in item 27 of his DA Form 
2-1), it appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of three years from 2 December 1974 to 1 December 1977.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 
2 December 1974 through 1 December 1977; and 

	b. adding the Good Conduct Medal to his DD Form 214.









2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the National Defense Service Medal.  




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024673





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024673



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019024

    Original file (20080019024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence shows the applicant was released from active duty on 4 August 1977 and held no Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009318

    Original file (20100009318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the Army Service Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, and Army Good Conduct Medal. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the required training before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981. b. the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active duty service for any period between 27 July 1950 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020819

    Original file (20120020819.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the following: * award of the – * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * National Defense Service Medal * dates of his promotions to the grades of E-2 through E-5 * training completion of the – * Basic Leadership Course * Primary Leadership Course * Aircraft Armament Mechanic Course * Aircraft Armament Mechanic Course (45M2O) * two correspondence courses 2. With respect to listing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014849

    Original file (20100014849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), and that he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. Records show that, subsequent to the applicant's period of AWOL, he served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the AGCM from 9 December 1973 through 8 December 1976. a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004760

    Original file (20070004760.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 September 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004760 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the National Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015836

    Original file (20130015836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Cold War Certificate * Army Commendation Medal 2. On 3 October 1977, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5 and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). While the available evidence is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022689

    Original file (20110022689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his foreign service in the Republic of Korea (ROK) and award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 December 1971 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 February 1977 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared on 18 June 1969 and last audited on 19 January 1971 * DA Form 2-1 (Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014983

    Original file (20080014983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM on 1 April 1977, less than 30 days prior to his separation. Although orders authorizing the ARCOM are normally required to support adding an award to a member's record and/or DD Form 214, in this case the ARCOM certificate appears to be genuine and signed by the proper award approval authority. The evidence of record also confirms that based on his service in Korea, he is also eligible for the KDSM which should also be added to his record and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008440

    Original file (20090008440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 22 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008440 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that he is entitled to award of the Overseas Service Ribbon, the Army Service Ribbon, and the Noncommissioned Officer Profes-sional Development Ribbon retroactively in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards). This regulation states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019046

    Original file (20130019046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar.