Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009318
Original file (20100009318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009318 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the Army Service Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, and Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states that according to guidelines he should have received these awards.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and printouts of the description and criteria of each of the above awards in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 August 1974.  He completed his initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty 36K (Field Wireman).

3.  On 29 October 1976, he accepted nonjudicial punishment for being drunk and disorderly.

4.  He was released from active duty on 26 August 1977 after completing 
2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active duty service.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214, Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show any awards.

6.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), subject:  Good Conduct Medal Recommendation that shows on 22 July 1977 his commander recommended that he be disapproved for award of the Good Conduct Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states:

	a.  the Army Service Ribbon was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981.  Effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award upon successful completion of initial entry training.  The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the required training before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 
1 August 1981.

	b.  the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active duty service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.  Second and subsequent awards of the National Defense Service Medal are denoted by a bronze service star affixed to the National Defense Service Medal.

	c.  the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Army Service Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, and Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant was not in an active duty status on or after 1 August 1981.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the Army Service Ribbon.

3.  He served on active duty from 28 August 1974 through 26 August 1977.  Therefore, he did not serve during a qualifying period of active service for award of the National Defense Service Medal.

4.  The available evidence shows the applicant's commander recommended disapproval of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore his DD Form 214 should not be corrected to show this medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _X   _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009318



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009318



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019024

    Original file (20080019024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence shows the applicant was released from active duty on 4 August 1977 and held no Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008440

    Original file (20090008440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 22 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008440 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that he is entitled to award of the Overseas Service Ribbon, the Army Service Ribbon, and the Noncommissioned Officer Profes-sional Development Ribbon retroactively in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards). This regulation states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018802

    Original file (20070018802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While assigned in Korea, the applicant reenlisted on 25 April 1975 for a period four years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the AFEM to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 April 1981. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080018943

    Original file (AR20080018943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his 1977 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect award of the Jungle Expert Badge, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, and the Overseas Service Ribbon. His records contain four performance evaluation reports covering the period February 1975, when he was initially assigned to Panama, through June 1977 when he was released from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024673

    Original file (20100024673.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the National Defense Service Medal and Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence he received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016804

    Original file (20140016804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and/or his military service records to show he: a. held military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police) and 75C (Personnel Management Specialist) while serving in Active Reserve units; b. was awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Armed Forces Reserve Medal, Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027199

    Original file (20100027199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal. General Orders Number 2107 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Engineer Command, Vietnam, dated 18 December 1971, awarded him the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service from 28 January 1971 to 10 January 1972. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of his subsequent DA Form 2-1 (Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012550

    Original file (20130012550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. The evidence of record shows during the applicant’s period of service from 22 February 1977 through 21 February 1983 he served in Korea for a period of 11 months and 18 days. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 12f of the applicant's DD Form 214 ending on 21 February 1983 the entry, "00 00 00" and adding the entry, "00 11 18" * adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020839

    Original file (20140020839.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Meritorious Service Medal. His retirement DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * Army Commendation Medal * Army Achievement Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (6th Award) * National Defense Service Medal * Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (2 Award) * Army Service Ribbon * Overseas Service Ribbon (3rd Award) * Expert Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000661

    Original file (20110000661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he served for 3 honorable years in the USMC and deserves a Good Conduct Medal * he read somewhere that one cannot have two Army Service Ribbons * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 October 1982 shows two awards of the Army Service Ribbon * when he served with the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment (ACR), he was awarded the Joint Service Commendation Medal * upon leaving the USMC, he attended college for 2 years with a major in Forestry * he completed various training...