Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004760
Original file (20070004760.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	


	BOARD DATE:	  19 September 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070004760 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Joyce A. Wright

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. James Vick

Chairperson

Mr. Ronald Gant

Member

Mr. Rowland Heflin

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Good Conduct Medal. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the exiting clerk did not add the National Defense Service Medal or the Good Conduct Medal to his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 December 1974.  He completed his basic combat training at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and his advanced individual training at Fort Gordon, Georgia.  After completing all required training, he was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS), 72E, Telecommunications Specialist.

3.  The applicant was promoted to Specialist Four (SP4)/E-4 effective 1 July 1976.  He continued to serve until he was honorably discharged from the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-19e(3), for physical disability, with severance pay, EPTS (existed prior to service).

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge, with Rifle Bar (M-16).  His DD Form 214 does not show any additional awards.


5.  There is no evidence of derogatory information contained in the available records.  There is no evidence the applicant was subjected to non-judicial punishment or courts-martial.  There is also no evidence that his commanders took action to deny him award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards.  It states, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954, between 1 January 1961 to 14 August 1974, and between 2 August 1990 to 30 November 1995.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the National Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

2.  The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 20 December 1974 to 6 May 1977 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service.

BOARD VOTE:

__RCH__  ___JEV _  __RG____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the National Defense Service Medal and the Good Conduct Medal, for the period 20 December 1974 to 6 May 1977, and adding these awards to his DD Form 214.




____  James E. Vick__________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070004760
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070919
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
19770506
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR 635-40, PARA 4-19E(3)
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
107
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000661

    Original file (20110000661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he served for 3 honorable years in the USMC and deserves a Good Conduct Medal * he read somewhere that one cannot have two Army Service Ribbons * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 October 1982 shows two awards of the Army Service Ribbon * when he served with the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment (ACR), he was awarded the Joint Service Commendation Medal * upon leaving the USMC, he attended college for 2 years with a major in Forestry * he completed various training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024673

    Original file (20100024673.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the National Defense Service Medal and Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence he received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019024

    Original file (20080019024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence shows the applicant was released from active duty on 4 August 1977 and held no Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009318

    Original file (20100009318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the Army Service Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, and Army Good Conduct Medal. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the required training before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981. b. the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active duty service for any period between 27 July 1950 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020819

    Original file (20120020819.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the following: * award of the – * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * National Defense Service Medal * dates of his promotions to the grades of E-2 through E-5 * training completion of the – * Basic Leadership Course * Primary Leadership Course * Aircraft Armament Mechanic Course * Aircraft Armament Mechanic Course (45M2O) * two correspondence courses 2. With respect to listing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014983

    Original file (20080014983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM on 1 April 1977, less than 30 days prior to his separation. Although orders authorizing the ARCOM are normally required to support adding an award to a member's record and/or DD Form 214, in this case the ARCOM certificate appears to be genuine and signed by the proper award approval authority. The evidence of record also confirms that based on his service in Korea, he is also eligible for the KDSM which should also be added to his record and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000860

    Original file (20080000860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that service in the Persian Gulf War is to be recognized by award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal to Army members who participated in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the designated area on or after 2 August 1990. In addition, the applicant’s DD Form 214, Item 12, block c, does not show the completion of any foreign service (i.e., time spent overseas) during the period of service under review. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021863

    Original file (20130021863.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for award of the Korean Service Medal; however, it does support award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. However, his record shows he completed a period of service in Korea qualifying for the award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the Korea Defense Service Medal to his DD Form 214 with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005100C070206

    Original file (20050005100C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the appropriate number of the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Evidence of records shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 October 1974 and was honorably released...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011340C070208

    Original file (20040011340C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests award of the basic Parachutist Badge, the Senior Parachutist Badge, the Expert Infantry Badge, the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal, two awards of the National Defense Service Medal (correctly known as the National Defense Service Medal with one bronze service star), the Combat Medical Badge, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM), and the Navy Expeditionary Medal. ...