Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024670
Original file (20100024670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024670 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was discharged by reason of a physical disability.

2.  The applicant states he wants his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) service-connected disability rating.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and a 12 February 2010 DVA disability decisional document.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's service medical and dental records are believed to be on permanent loan to the DVA and are not available for review.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 July 2008, completed training, and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

3.  A 14 May 2009 psychiatric evaluation provides the following information and assessment:




	a.  The applicant was sent to Community Mental Health Services (CMHS) by his unit because of concerns about his emotional state and complaints of depressed mood, withdrawal, social isolation, decreased enjoyment, sleep disturbance, and nightmares.  

	b.  At the time of the evaluation, the applicant reported that he had been unable to adjust to the requirements of military training, and he no longer wished to serve in the infantry.  He indicated he had depressed mood, nightmares, sleep disturbance, and thoughts of suicide, which were not typical of his emotional state prior to enlistment.  He attributed these problems to his poor adjustment to the military and he wished to be discharged from the Army.  His unit evaluation indicated poor performance in many areas and that he demonstrated poor potential to succeed in the Army.  His commander supported his separation.  His counseling appointments at CMHS did not resulted in any significant improvement of his adjustment problems.  He had not been deployed, did not exhibit symptoms consistent with PTSD, and denied a history of Traumatic Brain Injury.  

	c.  Based on this evaluation, the diagnoses, within the meaning of Army Regulation 40-501, Army Regulation 635-200, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM IV), were as follows:

* AXIS I Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety and Depressed Mood
* Axis II No Diagnosis
* Axis III Deferred
* Axis IV Occupational Problem

	d.  There was no psychiatric disease or defect which warranted disposition through medical channels.

	e.  The applicant was mentally responsible, able to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right, and the mental capacity to understand and participate in administrative board proceedings.

	f.  The applicant was psychiatrically cleared for any administrative action deemed necessary by his chain of command.

	g.  It was recommended that he be separated from the military in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17.  His psychiatric condition does not amount to disability but would significantly interfere with his assignment to or performance of duty.  He should not have access to weapons or ammunition.  It is unlikely that efforts to rehabilitate or develop him into a satisfactory member of the military would be successful.  His condition seriously impaired his ability to function in the Army and future incapacity due to inability to adjust is expected. 

4.  The applicant was notified of his proposed separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, for a designated physical or mental condition not amounting to a physical disability.

5.  On 11 August 2009, the applicant acknowledged the proposed separation action and elected not to provide a personal statement.

6.  On 2 September 2009, the separation authority approved the discharge action and directed the issuance of an honorable discharge.

7.  On 29 September 2009, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, due to other designated physical or mental conditions - not a disability.

8.  On 12 February 2010, the DVA granted the applicant a 10 percent disability rating for an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood. 

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) states a Soldier with less than 24 months of active duty service be separated for physical or mental condition, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40, that interfered with assignment to or performance of duty.  Separation because of adjustment disorder is authorized if the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function effectively in the military environment is significantly impaired.  

10.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides medical fitness standards for retention and separation.  It states that adjustment disorders may render individuals administratively unfit rather than unfit due to physical disability.  Interference with effective performance of duty in association with these conditions is to be dealt with through appropriate administrative channels.

11.  Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two 

concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he wants his DD Form 214 to reflect his DVA service connected disability rating determination.

2.  An award of a VA rating does not establish entitlement to medical retirement or separation.  The VA is not required to find unfitness for duty.  Operating under its own policies and regulations, the VA awards ratings because a medical condition is related to service, i.e., service-connected.  Furthermore, the VA can evaluate a veteran throughout his lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings.  The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated.

3.  The applicant was discharged for an adjustment disorder.  In accordance with military regulations such a condition renders an individual administratively unfit rather than unfit due to physical disability.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 correctly shows he was discharged due to a physical or mental condition not amounting to a disability.  The fact that the DVA has granted him a disability rating for his adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood does not affect his military separation.  No relief is warranted in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024670



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024670



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01598

    Original file (PD-2014-01598.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20081107 The CI was also diagnosed with an adjustment disorder and a personality disorder that the PEB “found to be not compensable, although they may be administratively unfitting.” This case is eligible for review under the stipulations of the MH and Review Program as elaborated in the Scope above and, in accordance with VASRD 4.130 (mental disorders), only one disability rating may be provided for MH (except eating disorders) based upon total social and occupational...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00430

    Original file (PD2009-00430.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB determined he was unfit for continued military service and he was then separated with a 10% disability for Anxiety Disorder using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Coast Guard and Department of Defense regulations. The psychiatrist recommended the CI was not psychiatrically fit for sea duty in the USCG, based on a combination of moderately severe psychiatric disorders. Four conditions had been evaluated by two previous PEBs which both...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009056

    Original file (20100009056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "disability" instead of "physical condition, not a disability." On 15 October 2003, his immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other physical and/or mental medical conditions not compatible with military...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00855

    Original file (PD2011-00855.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    CI CONTENTION : “The diagnosis of the Primary Condition rated by the Physical Evaluation Board (Major Depressive Disorder) was not the same condition I was diagnosed with (PTSD), resulting in an inappropriate disability rating and percentage. A remote VA exam, 31 months after separation, indicated continued unemployment, mental disorder symptoms that were less severe, and a GAF of 55. The PEB did not list PTSD or disability code 9411 on the PEB form; however, the preponderance of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007458

    Original file (20130007458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He successfully completed Basic Combat Training (BCT), and AIT and a 2-mile run was the only thing that kept him from being assigned to Fort Stewart, GA. d. He truly wants a chance to reenter military service. On 28 September 2008, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him under Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17, by reason of other designated physical or mental...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01077

    Original file (PD2012 01077.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active dutySPC/E-4 (92G10/Food Service),medically separated for major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychotic features.Her depressed mood started in May 2000, while experiencing difficulty sleeping, anxiety, difficulty concentrating, decreased appetite, feeling worthless and overwhelmed.She did not improve adequately with treatmentto meet the physical requirements of her...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02809

    Original file (PD-2013-02809.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.As noted above the MEB forwarded the diagnosis of PTSD to the PEB and the PEB reviewed the evidence presented by the unit...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01338

    Original file (PD-2013-01338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On admission the CI reported worsening depression and anxiety symptoms, auditory hallucinations of people calling her name and anger episodes involving hurting herself, though she denied SI or homicidal ideation (HI). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not...

  • CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 1997-092

    Original file (1997-092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, Dr. x, Dr. x, and Dr. x, Coast Guard doctors who examined the applicant many times in 199x and 199x, diagnosed him as having both a personality disorder and a depressive mood disorder. Dr. x diagnosed him as having both dysthymia (a depressive mood disorder) and a personality disorder. Therefore, the Board finds that, at the time of his discharge, the applicant had recently been diagnosed by Coast Guard medical personnel with both (a) a depressive mood disorder (dysthymia), which...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01862

    Original file (PD-2013-01862.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining back condition was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB. The Board also noted that the majority of the CI’s treatment notes proximal to separation, documented evaluation and treatment for his depression with anxiety condition. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...