Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023818
Original file (20100023818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  24 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023818 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her date of birth in item 5 (Date of Birth) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show 12 November 1969 instead of 12 November 1970.  She also requests correction of her mother's last name in item 19b (Nearest Relative) of her DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant states she believes the record is in error because the year of birth does not match her birth certificate, which she was recently able to retrieve.  She adds that she noticed her mother's last name is incorrectly spelled, as it shows the correct spelling on the birth certificate she submits. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of her U.S. Uniformed Services Identification and Privilege Card, social security card, and Certificate of Live Birth.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 March 1990.  She completed initial entry training, was awarded the military occupational specialty of equipment records and parts specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  She provided a copy of her birth record which shows her date of birth as 12 November 1969.  This document also shows her mother's name spelled "Retha Mae J***" (maiden name). 

4.  Her initial DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) and other documents contained in her records show her date of birth as 12 November 1969.

5.  Her enlistment documents show her mother's name as "Rita Od**."   

6.  On 2 April 1993, she was released from active duty.  Her DD Form 214 for this period of service shows her date of birth as 12 November 1970.  This form shows she completed a total 3 years and 20 days of active military service.

7.  Item 19b of her DD Form 214, in pertinent part, contains the entry, "Rita Ol**."  

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  This regulation, in effect at the time, stated that for item 19b of the DD Form 214 the NEAREST RELATIVE entry will be provided by the Soldier.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's copy of her birth record, DD Form 4, and other documents in her military records show her date of birth as 12 November 1969.  As such, it appears the date of birth on her DD Form 214 was transcribed in error; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct her DD Form 214 to show her date of birth as 12 November 1969.

2.  Regulatory policy provides that the Soldier will provide the name of a relative for entry in item 19b of their DD Form 214.  However, the spelling of her mother's last name on documents contained in her military records was "Od**."  Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that she intended to have this entry on her DD Form 214 to show the last name as "Od**" at the time it was completed.
3.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate for her records to be corrected as shown below. 

BOARD VOTE:

__x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  amending item 5 to read "12 November 1969"; and
   
   b.  amending so much of item 19b that pertains to the nearest relative's last name to read "Od**."




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023818



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023818



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003020

    Original file (20150003020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. Therefore, her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the correct spelling of her nearest relative’s name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013639

    Original file (20110013639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110013639 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of item 19b (Nearest Relative (Name and Address – Include Zip Code)) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the spelling of the city as "Pennington" instead of "Pemmington." Her service record contains the following documents which show the city and state of her nearest relative (father): * The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005245C071029

    Original file (20070005245C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    To the contrary, the evidence of record shows that she was able to complete the run portion of the physical readiness test three times after this injury, the last time being on 11 January 1992, the day before she attempted suicide. The evidence of record shows the applicant wanted to be discharged from the Army. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002750

    Original file (20140002750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the last name "Andrews" vice "Anderson" in item 19b (Nearest Relative). _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003702

    Original file (20130003702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an address in Conroe, Texas instead of an address in Crestview, Florida. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of item 19a of her DD Form 214 to show an address in Conroe, Texas instead of an address in Crestview, Florida. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004536

    Original file (20110004536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show award of the Humanitarian Service Medal and Afghanistan Campaign Medal * Item 14 (Military Education) to show the CBT (Combat Basic Training), HET (Heavy Equipment Training), Kalmar License, and Defense Advanced GPS (Global Positioning System) Receiver training * Item 19b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007377

    Original file (20090007377.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12a (Date Entered AD This Period) and the spelling of the name of the city in Items 7a (Home of Record at Time of Entry), 19a (Mailing Address After Separation), and 19b (Nearest Relative), recorded on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected. Therefore, based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is entitled to a correction in the spelling of the name of the city he reported as his home of record,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001764

    Original file (20140001764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 11 (Primary Specialty) -"92Y2O" * item 18 (Remarks) - the correct name and street address of her nearest relative 2. The evidence provided by the applicant is accepted as sufficient evidence to support correction of item 18 of the applicant's DD Form 214 to show the correct name and address of her nearest relative as listed on these documents. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002156

    Original file (20110002156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his nearest relative is not B____ A____ B____-P____ but rather is his mother, E____ D____ P____, and gives her address for inclusion at item 19. The Soldier is to be notified that the name and address of a relative should be someone who will know their location and address at all times. The record does not contain any clarifying information as to why his spouse's address is different than his and his children's or why he now wishes to have his mother listed as his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017813

    Original file (20110017813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and item 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the periods ending 14 September 1990 and 15 March 1991 to show R____ H____ as his nearest relative for his benefits. The DD Form 214 is a snapshot in time and is a reflection of the applicant's record of Active Army service at the time of his release from active duty. Since it appears his mother died...