Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015829
Original file (20110015829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015829 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that he was discharged in the rank and pay grade of specialist E-4.

2.  The applicant states that his discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) incorrectly reflect that he was discharged from the USAR in the rank and pay grade of Private First Class (PFC) E-3.  He further states that there was no adverse actions taken to reduce him in grade. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his discharge certificate and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 10 July 1997 for as period of 8 years.  He completed his training as a light wheeled vehicle mechanic and was returned to his USAR unit (308th Quartermaster Company).  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 9 September 2001.

3.  On 2 March 2003 he was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 and on 15 March 2003 he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom with the Company B, 389th Engineer Battalion.  He was deployed to Kuwait from 14 May 2003 to 9 June 2003 and to Iraq from 9 June to 27 April 2004.

4.  On 8 June 2004 he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of specialist (SPC) E-4.  He had served 1 year, 2 months, and 24 days of active service during his deployment and was returned to the 308th Quartermaster Company in Washington, Iowa.

5.  On 5 July 2005 Orders Number 05-186-00002 were published by the 89th Regional Readiness Command which honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR in the rank of PFC and he was issued a discharge certificate to reflect that information.

6.  A review of the applicant’s records failed to show any adverse action or indication that he had ever been reduced from the pay grade of E-4 to the pay grade of E-3.  A review of the Total Army Personnel Data Base reflects the applicant's rank as that of a PFC with a date of rank of 9 September 2001.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he was incorrectly discharged in the rank of PFC E-3 has been noted and appears to have merit.

2.  The applicant was advanced to the rank and pay grade of SPC E-4 on 15 March 2003 and it appears that his records were not properly annotated to reflect that advancement.

3.  Inasmuch as his records contain no evidence to show that he was reduced in grade, it is reasonable to presume that an administrative error resulted in failure to properly record his advancement to the rank of SPC.  

4.  Accordingly, his records should be corrected to reflect that he was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of Specialist on 5 July 2005 and he should be issued a new DD Form 256A to replace the DD Form 256A currently held by the applicant.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant was honorably discharged in the rank of specialist on 5 July 2005 and issuing him a new DD Form 256A to replace the one currently held by the applicant.



      __________X_________
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015829





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015829



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002034C070205

    Original file (20060002034C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Karmin Jenkins | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her rank and pay grade as specialist (SPC), E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000787

    Original file (20150000787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 April 1983, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank of SPC and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). His record does not contain any evidence that shows he ever requested or was denied attendance at a military school. In the absence of evidence that shows he was promoted to the rank of SGT and satisfactorily served in the rank of SGT during his service in the USAR prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve on 30 May 2004, there is insufficient evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007890

    Original file (20110007890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 10 November 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110007890 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to properly show his rank/grade as SPC/E-4 with a date of rank of 29 March 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023051

    Original file (20100023051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/E-3. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013123

    Original file (20100013123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024066

    Original file (20100024066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DD Form 1351-2, dated 22 April 1982, as provided by the applicant, indicates his pay grade at the time was E-4. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant held the rank of SP4 and pay grade E-4 at the time of his release from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show in item 4a and 4b his rank and pay grade as SP4 and E-4,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020402

    Original file (20090020402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was released from active duty as a SP4, E-4 but his discharge certificate shows his rank and pay grade as private first class (PFC), E-3. The applicant states he was released from active duty as a SP4 but his discharge certificate shows his rank and pay grade as PFC. _________x__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023247

    Original file (20110023247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized * her total service to include her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) inactive duty training and annual training * her rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2 * her actual duty served 2. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100104C070208

    Original file (2004100104C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her record be corrected to show she enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in the rank and pay grade of specialist/E-4 (SPC/E-4). It indicates a review of the applicant’s record revealed that she was erroneously accessed in the rank and pay grade of PFC/E-3 on 1 October 2002, but had in fact been promoted to SPC/E-4 on 15 September 2002, while a member of the USAR. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s...