Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018218
Original file (20100018218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018218 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of induction be corrected to show 25 October 1962 and his military occupational specialty (MOS) to show 111 (Infantryman).

2.  The applicant states his date of induction and his MOS are incorrectly shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), his DD Form 214, and his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's date of induction was corrected with the issuance of the DD Form 215.  Therefore, this issue is moot and will not be further addressed.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 October 1962 and completed MOS training as a cook (941) as well as basic airborne training.

4.  His DA Form 20 shows he served in Vietnam in the principal duty of:

* cook with Company D, 2nd Airborne Group, 187th Infantry Regiment, from 13 June 1963 through 2 February 1964
* automatic rifleman with Company C, 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 506th Infantry Regiment, from 3 February 1964 through 23 October 1964
* during both periods his MOS is listed as 941.17

5.  The applicant was released from active duty on 23 October 1964.  His separation orders show MOS 941.17 as does his DD Form 214.

6.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, provided the policies for the Enlisted Personnel Management System.  In pertinent part, an MOS will be awarded upon qualification in an MOS, completion of MOS training by an Army service school or training activity or upon successful completion of on-the-job training.  All awards of an MOS are to be announced in published orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in a duty position of an automatic rifleman; however, there is no evidence he was formally awarded MOS 111.

2.  Without documentation to show the applicant was awarded MOS 111, there is insufficient evidence to warrant correction of his record.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018218



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018218



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011733

    Original file (20080011733.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Parachutist Badge and completion of the Basic Airborne Course. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he completed the 3-week Basic Airborne Course on 13 April 1962. However, Special Orders Number 85, Headquarters, 2nd Airborne Battle Group (Reinforced), 503rd Infantry, dated 9 April 1963, withdrew MOS 111.07 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007837

    Original file (20080007837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show award of four rather than just three Purple Hearts for wounds received during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. General Orders Number 14391, 101st Airborne Division, dated 10 December 1970, awarded the applicant a second Purple Heart for wounds received on 19 February 1970; and a third Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 6 July 1970. DISCUSSION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017046

    Original file (20080017046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He completed basic airborne training and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky. A review of the applicant's official military records fails to show that the applicant was ever awarded a field artillery MOS. Accordingly, it appears that the applicant's DD Form 214 was correctly prepared to reflect the PMOS that was then and still is documented in his official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019842

    Original file (20110019842.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a photograph of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) in support of his application. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 25 November 1960 through 13 November 1962 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009754

    Original file (20100009754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. A Soldier may be awarded both the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Combat Medical Badge for the same period or during the same conflict, but not for the same act.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019236

    Original file (20130019236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, and Reductions) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he was promoted to SP5/E-5 (T) on 3 April 1964 and SP5/E-5 (P) on 3 April 1965. Army Regulation 624-200, effective 1 July 1962, section III, governed the temporary appointment of enlisted personnel of the active Army to pay grades E-4 through E-9 made against periodic temporary appointment quota allocations issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army. However, all evidence in his records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016249

    Original file (20090016249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge be shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014455

    Original file (20100014455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served in duty MOS 94A (Cook Helper) or 94B throughout his military service; it does not show any entries for service in an infantry duty MOS. His records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. Notwithstanding his and his former platoon sergeants' sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024738

    Original file (20100024738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably released from active duty on 15 July 1991 to the control of his ARNG unit. With respect to his service in Korea, the evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea as a rifleman to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry from 22 May 1964 to 25 June 1965. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support awarding him the CIB for this period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028450

    Original file (20100028450.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), appendix V, states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted Soldiers who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...