Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017046
Original file (20080017046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        06 JANUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017046 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect that he served as an artillery sergeant.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 reflects that he served as a cook, when in fact he served as an artillery sergeant and was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant while serving as a gunner in a 105-mm howitzer battery.

3.  The applicant provides a Department of Veterans Affairs Statement in Support of Claim (VA Form 21-4138), a copy of his DD Form 214, copies of five orders, a copy of his Certificate of Completion of the Airborne Course, and a copy of his Jumpmaster Course completion.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 June 1962, for a period of 3 years under the airborne unassigned enlistment option.  He completed his basic training at Fort Ord, California and remained at Fort Ord to undergo his advanced individual training.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of a light weapons infantryman on 7 December 1962 and was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia to undergo basic airborne training.  He completed basic airborne training and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

3.  On 6 August 1963, he was awarded a primary MOS (PMOS) of a cook (94B), while assigned to Battery C, 2nd Howitzer Battalion, 320th Artillery Regiment.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 30 November 1964.

4.  On 8 July 1965, he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit and was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 in MOS 94B4P on 8 August 1966.  He departed Vietnam on 4 February 1967 and was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on
6 February 1967 as an overseas returnee.  He had served 4 years, 7 months, and 7 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 reflects in block 25a (Specialty Number and Title) that his specialty number and title was "94B4P Cook." 

5.  A review of the applicant's official military records fails to show that the applicant was ever awarded a field artillery MOS.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations – Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time provided that only the PMOS would be entered in block 25a.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he served as a field artilleryman in Vietnam is not in doubt, there simply is no evidence in his official records to show that he was ever awarded a field artillery MOS.

2.  The evidence of record does show that he was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 while in Vietnam and that he was promoted in MOS 94B4P, which was, at the time, the MOS of a cook.  

3.  Accordingly, it appears that the applicant's DD Form 214 was correctly prepared to reflect the PMOS that was then and still is documented in his official record.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no basis to grant his request. 

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017046



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017046



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007587C070205

    Original file (20060007587C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 15 February 1968, to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 13A1O and that he served in Vietnam. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968, should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004838

    Original file (20130004838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. It states the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. Although the applicant may have served in MOS 141.20 during his active service, the evidence of record shows he held MOS 152.60 during his last duty assignment at Fort Hood, TX.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002836

    Original file (20140002836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * his rank as sergeant (SGT) * a secondary military occupational specialty (SMOS) – 11B (Infantryman) * completion of the M198 Howitzer Course 2. He provides: a. a USAIS diploma that shows he completed Individual Infantry Training and his 11B PMOS orders; b. a Certificate of Training that shows he completed the M198 Howitzer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051957C070420

    Original file (2001051957C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 20 July 1962, be corrected in Block 25a (Specialty Number and Title) to show 675.30 - Helicopter Mechanic vice 351.10 - Power Generator Specialist. The record also indicates that he received 5 weeks of school training in MOS 670.00 (helicopter mechanic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058986C070421

    Original file (2001058986C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. correction of item 18b (Prior Active Service) on his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 18 December 1981, which amended his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) originally dated 18 November 1975 to show the entry “06 02 00”; The Board considered the applicant’s contention that item 25a (Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 18 March 1963 should be corrected to show MOS 121.63. The Board also considered the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005482

    Original file (20140005482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he completed advanced individual training at Fort Sill, OK, for an artillery MOS and served in Vietnam as an artilleryman. On 16 April 1970, Headquarters, Americal Division, published SO Number 106 affecting the following changes effective 4 March 1970: appointing him to the grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 in MOS 94B, withdrawing MOS 13A, and awarding him primary MOS (PMOS)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001598

    Original file (20090001598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, in the absence of orders awarding the applicant MOS 11B as his PMOS or some other substantiating evidence, there is insufficient evidence to support correction of the applicant’s separation orders and final DD Form 214, particularly in view of the evidence below. While the evidence of record indicates that the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit and he may have performed the duties of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007237

    Original file (20130007237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as Artillery. The version of the regulation in effect at the time stated to enter the specialty the Soldier held at the time of his release from active duty in item 25a of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021036

    Original file (20110021036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to add his service in the Dominican Republic to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer pr Discharge). The applicant states, in effect, he served in the Dominican Republic from June to August 1965 and that service is not reflected on his DD Form 214. His record clearly shows his last foreign service was performed in Vietnam, which is correctly reflected on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006384

    Original file (20080006384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he served in Vietnam with the 101st Airborne in early 1963. The applicant's records clearly show that his statements are false; he never served in Vietnam and his only facial "wound" was a broken nose suffered in a fist fight at Fort Campbell. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.