Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017884
Original file (20100017884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  4 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100017884 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his rank at the time of his discharge.

2.  The applicant indicated by the documents he provides that at the time he was released from active duty he was serving in the rank of private first class (PFC).  However, by the time he was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) he had been advanced to the rank of specialist four (SP4) and he desires his DD Form 214 to reflect his rank as SP4 so that he will be given the proper rank at his burial.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a certification of military service
* a copy of his DD Form 214
* a copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate showing he was discharged in the rank of SP4
* copies of miscellaneous documents showing his rank as SP4 in the USAR

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 January 1958.  He completed his training as a light weapons infantryman and was transferred to Germany for assignment to the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment where he served 1 year, 5 months, and 14 days.  He returned to Fort Sheridan, Illinois, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of PFC as an overseas returnee on 18 December 1959.  He had 1 year, 11 months, and 10 days of total active service and was transferred to the USAR to complete his service obligation.

3.  On 31 December 1963, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of SP4 and he was issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate in that rank.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information that exists at the time of release or discharge from active duty.  Service or events that occur subsequent to the date the DD Form 214 was issued will not be entered on the DD Form 214 retroactively unless the event occurred during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 was properly prepared to reflect his service as of the date of his REFRAD and he failed to show the form is in error.

2.  Army Regulation 635-5 specifically provides that information or events that occur subsequent to the date the DD Form 214 is issued will not be entered on that form retroactively.  While it is understood why the applicant desires to have his DD Form 214 changed to reflect his subsequent service in the USAR, such a change is not authorized by regulation.

3.  However, the applicant is not precluded from requesting a statement of service from the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, the current custodian of his service records.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017884



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017884



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013834

    Original file (20130013834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her rank as a Specialist Four (SP4). The applicant states, in effect, that her DD Form 214 shows her rank as a PV1; however, she was a SP4 when she was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Accordingly, a change in her rank is not authorized under the regulations governing the preparation of the DD Form 214 and there is no basis to grant her request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003902

    Original file (20130003902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 March 1988 to show in item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) the date 30 July 1983 vice 7 May 1985 * retroactive payment of $39.00 per month for his military pay when he held the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 * the issuance of the Physical Fitness Badge 2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the RA and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018847

    Original file (20100018847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show he was released from initial active duty for training (IADT) in the rank of specialist four (SP4) with a date of rank of 5 April 1978 or earlier. On 7 August 2001 in response to a letter from the applicant to the President of the United States, the Chief, Field Systems Division, Total Army Personnel Command, dispatched a letter to the applicant informing him that while his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005620C070208

    Original file (20040005620C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the applicant's DD Form 214 was prepared to record his service from the date of his entry on active duty on 17 July 1972 until his release from active duty on 16 November 1972. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected: a. in items 5a and 5b to show his rank and grade as PFC, E-3;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013740

    Original file (20100013740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his rank and pay grade as private first class (PFC)/E-3 at the time of his discharge. At the time the applicant was released from active duty for training and his DD Form 214 was issued he was serving in pay grade E-1. Accordingly, the DD Form 214 was correctly prepared to reflect his rank and pay grade at the time the DD Form 214 was issued and he has failed to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014659

    Original file (20140014659.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214, effective date 11 April 1971 * DD Form 256A, dated 8 June 1976 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Records show the applicant was not promoted to SP4 until 1 April 1972, after his discharge from active duty on 11 April 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010851

    Original file (20130010851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her rank and grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/E-3. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. She may have been promoted to SP4/E-4 in the USAR after her release from active duty which explains why the two...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013415

    Original file (20110013415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 at the time of his release from active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of REFRAD, retirement, or discharge. The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he held the rank of SP4/E-4 at the time of REFRAD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014160

    Original file (20090014160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document also shows the applicant's rank was SP4. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was REFRAD in the rank of SP4/E-4 with a DOR of 9 July 1972 because he held that rank when he was separated from active duty and also at the time he was discharged from the USAR. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the correct rank, grade, and DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012417

    Original file (20110012417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, 723rd Maintenance Battalion, Unit Orders Number 76, dated 21 October 1968, appointed the applicant to the temporary grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4. There are no orders or any other document that shows he was appointed or promoted to the rank of SGT (E-5).