Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010851
Original file (20130010851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	  20 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130010851 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her rank and grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/E-3. 

2.  The applicant states she was promoted to E-4.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Reassignment Orders 106-08
* U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's records are not available for review with this case.  An exhaustive search was undertaken to locate her complete military records which are necessary for the processing of her application.  Unfortunately, they could not be found.  The applicant provided sufficient documents for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The available evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 18 July 1980.  She entered active duty for training (ADT) on 25 July 1980 and she completed the required training for military occupational specialty (MOS) 75B (Personnel Administration Specialist). 

4.  She was honorably released from ADT on 27 October 1980 to the control of her USAR unit.  She completed 3 months and 3 days of active service.  Her
DD Form 214 shows in: 

* Items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) - PFC and E-3
* Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) - 80-07-18

5.  It appears subsequent to her release from ADT she served with a troop program unit of the USAR.  

6.  On 5 June 1981, Headquarters, IX Corps (Augmentation), Honolulu, HI, published Orders 106-08 releasing her from the 368th Military Police Company and transferring her to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  The orders listed her rank as SP4. 

7.  On 12 March 1986, the USAR Personnel Center published Orders 
D-03-018723 honorably discharging her from the USAR effective 12 March 1986. These orders listed her rank as SP4. 

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  In establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active service.  It states for Items 4a and 4b, enter the enlisted rank/grade at the time of the Soldier's separation and for Item 12h, enter the effective date of rank.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant served on active duty during the period 25 July through 27 October 1980.  During her active duty service she held the rank/grade of PFC/E-3.  She did not hold the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. 
2.  She may have been promoted to SP4/E-4 in the USAR after her release from active duty which explains why the two orders she provided reflect her grade as SP4.  However, her USAR promotion had no impact on her previously-issued 
DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of a Soldier's period of continuous active service.

3.  There is insufficient evidence to support granting her the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010851



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010851



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000087

    Original file (20150000087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013615

    Original file (20080013615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. A copy of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows, in item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that the applicant was promoted to PFC effective 1 May 1980 and to SP4 effective 1 August 1981.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008297

    Original file (20130008297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, her pay grade be corrected to show E-4 on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 January 1980. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Since she was appointed to pay grade E-4 in the USAR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012396

    Original file (20090012396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty (emphasis added) to include attendance at basic combat and advanced training and will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. The evidence of record shows that at the time of her release from active duty on 24 October 1990, the applicant held the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062705C070421

    Original file (2001062705C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) on 28 May 1985, in the pay grade of E-1. Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of her DD Form 214 shows the entry “85 05 28” (28 May 1985).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024066

    Original file (20100024066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DD Form 1351-2, dated 22 April 1982, as provided by the applicant, indicates his pay grade at the time was E-4. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant held the rank of SP4 and pay grade E-4 at the time of his release from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show in item 4a and 4b his rank and pay grade as SP4 and E-4,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001495

    Original file (20110001495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His request to correct his rank/grade and DOB on his DD Form 214 is partially supported by the evidence of record. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 5 of his DD Form 214 to show is DOB as “631128.” 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023247

    Original file (20110023247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized * her total service to include her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) inactive duty training and annual training * her rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2 * her actual duty served 2. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009268

    Original file (20100009268.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With the exception of the applicant's DD Form 214, all documents maintained in his military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) issued subsequent to the date of his promotion to the rank of SP4 lists his rank as SP4. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SP4/E-4 on 1 January 1997 and this was the rank he held on his date of separation from active duty as evidenced by the DA Form 4187 and his separation orders. Therefore, items 4a, 4b, and 12h of...