Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013740
Original file (20100013740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  23 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013740 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his rank and pay grade as private first class (PFC)/E-3 at the time of his discharge.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged in the rank of PFC/E-3 and he desires his DD Form 214 to reflect that rank.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Minnesota Army National Guard (MNARNG) on 13 December 1980 for a period of 6 years.  He was ordered to initial active duty for training on 14 June 1981 at Fort Benning, Georgia, where he underwent one-station unit training as a light weapons infantryman.  On 9 September 1981, he was honorably released from active duty for training in pay grade E-1 and was returned to his MNARNG unit.

3.  He was advanced to pay grade E-3 on 24 January 1983 and on 20 November 1983 he was honorably discharged from the MNARNG in pay grade E-3 under the expeditious discharge program (EDP) and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve).  He was issued a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) that shows he was discharged in pay grade E-3.

4.  On 12 December 1986, he was honorably discharged from the USAR in pay grade E-3 due to completion of his service obligation (6 years).  He was issued orders reflecting his discharge in pay grade E-3.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 is issued upon release or discharge from active duty and reflects information that is current as of the date of release or discharge from active duty.  Information/changes that occur subsequent to the effective date of the DD Form 214 are not authorized for retroactive entry on that form unless the event occurred during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect that his pay grade was E-3 at the time of his discharge has been noted and found to lack merit.

2.  At the time the applicant was released from active duty for training and his DD Form 214 was issued he was serving in pay grade E-1.  Accordingly, the DD Form 214 was correctly prepared to reflect his rank and pay grade at the time the DD Form 214 was issued and he has failed to show otherwise.

3.  The applicant was subsequently advanced to pay grade E-3 and was discharged in that pay grade from the MNARNG and the USAR.  Accordingly, he was issued an NGB Form 22 and discharge orders to reflect his rank at the time of his discharge.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013740



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013740



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022246

    Original file (20100022246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a 30 July 2010 letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service * a 4 March 2010 letter from the Minnesota Army National Guard (MNARNG) * Certificate of Honorable Discharge from the MNARNG, dated 11 April 1990 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period 12 April 1984-14 September 1990 * NGB Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22), dated 11 February 2010 * DA Form 3686 (Joint Uniform Military Pay System-Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011801

    Original file (20080011801.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) during the period of 3 November 2002 through 3 January 2007, that he was granted retirement points for that period, and that he was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant (1LT) on 24 January 2003. He also states that he has again been appointed in the MNARNG in the rank of 2LT on 3 January 2007 and desires his date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011328

    Original file (20120011328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * National Personnel Records Center letter * DD Form 214 ending 15 October 1989 * DD Form 214 ending 3 December 1993 * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders dated 1 June 1994 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * Retirement Points Accounting System Summary Points Inquiry/Update * DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014217

    Original file (20110014217.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the governing regulation provides for the requested adjustment of his DOR and effective date for promotion to LTC. Paragraph (a) states, in pertinent part, that officers shall be placed in the promotion zone and shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title, far enough in advance of completing the MYIG so that, if the officer is recommended for promotion, the promotion may be effective on or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015803

    Original file (20140015803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is requesting to be properly credited with all Reserve service performed specifically from 7 February 1991 through 27 December 1994, to indicate that this service was performed as an USAR Warrant Officer aviator on AD during the mobilization in support of the Active Army Requirements for Desert Shield/Storm. He requested voluntary AD retirement and was retired on 31 October 1999. d. The law is clear at the time the applicant was separated in 1996 and 1999 in order to qualify for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014738

    Original file (20140014738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Jungle Expert Badge, Humanitarian Service Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, Soldier of the Month, and Soldier of the Year. There is no evidence in his available military records indicating he was awarded the Jungle Expert Badge or the Army Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was awarded the Jungle Expert Badge or Soldier of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017352

    Original file (20120017352.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. DA Form 4651, dated 15 October 2010, that shows he requested assignment to the 7302nd Medical Training Support Brigade, Madison, WI, for duty in an O-5 position; c. email messages, spanning the period from 14 December 2010 to 15 March 2011, that document the applicant's correspondence with several ARNG and USAR officials and his efforts during this period to transfer from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to either an ARNG or USAR unit; d. an AHRC Form 4145, dated 2 February 2011,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006957

    Original file (20130006957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that all of his separation documents, to include his Honorable Discharge Certificate, be corrected to show he was discharged in the rank and pay grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3. The evidence of record clearly shows that he was reduced to the pay grade of E-2 due to unsatisfactory participation and was subsequently discharged for the same reason in the pay grade of E-2. The applicant did not participate in the MOARNG prior to or after his reduction to the pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018136C070206

    Original file (20050018136C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his 1980 and 1995 reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes, correction of the status of his period of service in 1994 and 1995, correction of his pay grade to E-5, and separation pay for the years of 1980, 1986, and 1995. A 27 June 1975 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation) indicates the applicant was honorably discharged under the Trainee Discharge Program (Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5 as then in effect). These codes are contained on military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020402

    Original file (20090020402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was released from active duty as a SP4, E-4 but his discharge certificate shows his rank and pay grade as private first class (PFC), E-3. The applicant states he was released from active duty as a SP4 but his discharge certificate shows his rank and pay grade as PFC. _________x__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.