BOARD DATE: 1 March 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100016557
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests payment for the following drills (hereafter referred to as Battle Assemblies or BA):
* 6, 8, and 10 October; 21, 23, and 26 November; 14, 18, 19, 21, 26, 28, and 31 December 2007
* 21, 23, 25, 28, and 30 January; 1, 5, and 7 February; and 2, 29, and 30 April 2008
2. The applicant states he performed the required 48 BAs and the above additional BAs; however, he was not paid for the additional BAs.
3. The applicant provides various DA Forms 1380 (Record of Individual Performance of Reserve Duty Training) and a letter of denial from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Having had prior service, the applicant's records show he was appointed as a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Judge Advocate General's Corps commissioned officer and he executed an oath of office on 14 June 1983. He served in staff and leadership positions in the USAR and on active duty and he attained the rank of colonel (COL) on 6 October 2004.
2. On 28 October 1999, the USAR Personnel Command, St. Louis, MO, issued the applicant a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter).
3. On 6 March 2006, he was reassigned from his IMA (Individual Mobilization Augmentee) duties at the U.S. Army Legal Services Agency, Arlington, VA, to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement or Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)).
4. On 28 March 2006, he was reassigned from the USAR Control Group (IRR) to the U.S. Army Element (USAE), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), Alexandria, VA. His orders stated he was authorized for drilling in the IMA program up to 48 IDTs (inactive duty for training). Additionally, drills performed without prior pay category A and/or pay category B authorization were for points only.
5. On 30 April 2008, he was reassigned from the USAE, DCMA, to the Retired Reserve for having achieved maximum age.
6. The applicant submitted several DA Forms 1380, dated as follows:
* 27 February 2007, shows he performed a BA on 27 February 2007
* 27 February 2007, shows he performed BAs on 25, 27, and 28 February 2007
* 27 February 2007, shows he performed a BA on 27 February 2007
* 2 March 2007, shows he performed a BA on 2 March 2007
* 9 June 2007, shows he performed BAs on 7, 8, and 9 June 2007
* Undated, shows he performed BAs on 2 and 4 October 2007
* 4 November 2007, shows he performed BAs on 29 and 31 October and on 2, 3, and 4 November 2007
* 1 December 2007, shows he performed BAs on 3 and 4 October 2006, 8, 22, and 30 November 2006, and 1 December 2006.
* 3 March 2008, shows he performed BAs as on 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, and 29 February 2008, and 3 March 2008.
* 26 March 2008, shows he performed BAs on 5, 7, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19, 21, 24, and 26 March 2008.
* Undated, shows he performed a BA on 13 March 2008.
7. His current Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPC) Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirements Points) shows he was awarded 74, 150, and 88 IDT points during the periods 28 September 2005 through 27 September 2006, 28 September 2006 through 27 September 2007, and 28 September 2007 through 30 April 2008, respectively.
8. On 12 May 2010, a DFAS official notified the applicant that a review of his records determined he was paid for 48 drills performed from 1 October 2007 through 30 September 2008, and a breakdown of such service.
a. A Reserve Component (RC) Soldier may only perform 48 Unit Training Assemblies (UTAs) during a fiscal year (FY) (1 October through 30 September). The applicant's contested drills on 6, 8, and 10 October; 21, 23, and 26 November; 14, 17, 19, 21, 26, 28, and 31 December 2007; 23, 25, 28, and 30 January; 1, 5, and 7 February; 3 March; 2, 29, and 30 April 2008, are not payable as 48 UTAs had already been paid.
b. The drills for 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, 29 February; 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19, 21, 24, and 26 March; 23, 25, and 28 April 2008, are coded N1 on the DA Forms 1380 which are used for retirement points only.
9. Army Regulation 140-145 (IMA Program) establishes policies and prescribes procedures for the employment, utilization, and management of the IMA program. Paragraph 4-5 states Soldiers assigned to IMA positions, except for S3 and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) CPSD (Civil Preparedness Support Detachments) positions may perform up to 48 periods of IDT, for pay, each FY. The maximum number of IDTs may be reduced based on current FY budget constraints. The scheduling and performance of all authorized IDT periods is to be coordinated directly between the Soldier and their proponent agency. IMA IDT schedules should appropriately consider the Soldiers personal availability as well as the proponent agencys overall mission requirements. Proponent agency heads are encouraged to schedule and distribute all authorized IDT periods throughout the FY in order to achieve desired training, continuity and proficiency goals for their assigned IMA Soldiers. It states proponent agencies may assign additional projects to their Soldiers to complete, with their consent, for retirement point credit only.
10. Army Regulation 140-185 (Training and Retirement Points Credit and Unit Level Strength Accounting Records) prescribes the types of training and activities for which retirement points are authorized. Paragraph 3-3 states the code "P" or "N" will be entered in item 10c before the retirement point credit. The code "P" indicates the Soldier is entitled to inactive duty pay for the duties performed; the code "N" indicates the Soldier is entitled to retirement point credit only.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was issued reassignment orders from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to the USAE, DCMA. His orders stated he was authorized for drilling in the IMA program up to 48 IDTs and that drills performed without prior authorization were for points only.
2. By regulation an RC Soldier may only perform 48 paid UTAs during a FY. The applicant in this case performed in excess of the authorized paid UTAs. Some UTAs were clearly coded N (for retirement points only) while others were coded P (entitled to inactive duty pay). However, since he had performed and received pay for the 48 authorized UTAs, he is not entitled to additional pay for the contested periods.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x___ __x______ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________x____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100016557
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100016557
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016675
The applicant was credited with 56 retirement points (1 year of qualifying service) for the retirement year 21 October 2001-20 October 2002. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant and counsel have not submitted any evidence showing the applicant completed more than the 17 years of qualifying service for which he has already been credited. The information in iPERMS shows that retirement points were unable to be awarded to the applicant because he was not assigned or...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-220
This final decision, dated June 12, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a chief health services specialist who was medically retired from the Reserve on April 5, 1997, with a 30% disability rating for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), asked the Board to correct her time in service, awards, and Reserve drill points for her inactive duty training (IDT (paid drills)), active duty training (ADT), special active duty training...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00869
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She and another unit member contacted HQ Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) in July 2006 and inquired as to whether or not her duty status needed to be altered on orders. DPP notes her statement that she was unable to perform IDT training on 13 August 2005 because the entire building was closed on that Saturday and training was not available. ...
AFMAN 36-8001, Reserve Personnel Participation and Training Procedures, does not apply to the ANG, the component to which he belonged at the time he performed the 48 IDT periods. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/FMF recommends the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006370
They will receive retirement point credit only; c. IMA detachments will consist of IMAs who volunteer for inactive duty training (IDT) for retirement points only. Therefore, no retirement points can be awarded to the applicant for the period of service after his transfer to the Retired Reserve on 25 January 2000. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, additional retirement points for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03370
Points for participation can only be credited for the dates the inactive duty was performed. Correction to the advisory is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and indicated that although the Reserve Order DA-01859 does assign him to the 514th AMW as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) he was in fact hired as a full-time Air Reserve Technician (ART). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2007-03405-2
In view of this, we believe the only viable option at this point in time is to recommend his promotion to the grade of major by the Fiscal Year 2007 Reserve Major Board. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: He was awarded an additional 12 paid inactive duty training (IDT) points, 14 active duty training (ADT) points, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080015482
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show the minimum points necessary for a qualifying retirement year for each of the three years he served as a reservist in the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC). This document, in pertinent part, shows beginning on 1 October 1991 through the retirement year ending (RYE) date of 13 May 1993, the applicant was a member of the ROTC and did not earn any creditable retirement points. The applicants military personnel records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013607
The applicant states that his unit commander at the 414th Civil Affairs (CA) Battalion gave him an unsatisfactory participation for a drill weekend without trying to contact him. The applicant provides a self-authored supplementary letter; a DVA rating decision, undated; his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 30 March 2004; a 414th Civil Affairs Battalion, memorandum, dated 3 December 2007, Subject: Letter of Instructions-Unexcused Absence; a DVA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056350C070420
APPLICANT STATES : The applicant states that he should receive SSP based on his removal on 25 February 1994 from a deleted Individual Mobilization Augmentation (IMA) position because of the revision of the Mobilization (MOB) TDA/TOE. The applicant did request transfer to the Retired Reserve and his request was granted; however, that transfer took place 7 months after he had secured attachment to ARPERCEN to drill for points, and 5 months after his reassignment from the IMA position at Fort...