Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014860
Original file (20100014860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  30 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100014860


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 7 June 1970 to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states that his current DD Form 214 is incorrect because he was promoted to SGT/E-5 prior to leaving Vietnam in June 1970.

3.  The applicant provided copies of his DD Form 214 and Special Orders Number 157, Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, dated 6 June 1970.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 August 1967.  Records show he completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).

3.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of SGT by Special Orders Number 90, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, on 31 March 1970, with an effective date of 15 March 1970.  The record copy of this order is an extract and is missing the promotion authority's signature or authentication.

4.  Special Orders Number 157, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, dated 6 June 1970, released the applicant from active duty and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  The applicant's rank on this order is SGT.

5.  Numerous record documents, specifically a DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement), DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental Status on Release from Active Service), and DA Form 2376 (Notification of State Adjutants General Release from Active Duty of Obligated Reservist), dated at the time of the applicant's release from active duty all refer to the applicant's rank as SGT.

6.  On 7 June 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 5, and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  He completed a total of 2 years, 9 months, and 21 days of creditable active service.  The applicant's DD Form 214, item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), item 5b (Pay Grade), and item 6 (Date of Rank), show his rank, pay grade, and date of rank at the time of his separation were specialist four, E-4, and 21 June 1968, respectively.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it directed that in item 5a to enter the rank in which serving at time of separation; in item 5b to enter the pay grade for the rank shown in item 5a; and in item 6 to enter the date of rank for the rank shown in item 5a.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his rank and grade shown on his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show SGT/E-5.

2.  Despite the fact that the record copy of the applicant's SGT promotion order is an extract and devoid of a promotion authority's signature or authentication, it is presumed to be legitimate.  This order coupled with other available evidence confirms the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SGT/E-5 effective 15 March 1970, in official orders that were published prior to his 7 June 1970 release from active duty.

3.  By regulation, the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of separation will be entered in item 5a and item 5b of the DD Form 214 and the effective date of rank for the rank shown in item 5a will be entered in item 6.  Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected at this time by deleting the current entries in items 5a, 5b, and 6; and by adding the entry SGT to item 5a, by adding E-5 to item 5b, and by adding 15 March 1970 to item 6.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's DD Form 214 by deleting the current entries in item 5a, 5b, and 6; by adding the entry SGT to item 5a; by adding E-5 to item 5b; by adding 15 March 1970 to item 6; and by issuing a correction to the DD Form 214 to reflect these changes.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011932



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014860



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025228

    Original file (20110025228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Special Orders Number 120, dated 30 April 1969, show he was promoted to the temporary grade of SSG. Items 5a and 5b, enter the rank/grade in which a member was serving at the time of separation with an indication if permanent or temporary; for example "SSG (T) (Staff Sergeant, Temporary), SGT (P)." However, Army regulations allow Soldiers serving in a temporary grade at the time of separation to have that temporary grade entered on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015772

    Original file (20130015772.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from his DD Form 214 the entry in: * item 5a and adding "SGT" * item 5b and adding "E-5" * item 6 and adding "13 December 1971" * item 23a and adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011488

    Original file (20120011488.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. Special Orders Number 231 that promoted the applicant to SGT/E-5 effective 4 August 1971 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a, 5b, and 6 of his DD Form 214. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003335C070206

    Original file (20050003335C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003335 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT), E-5. In addition, it would be appropriate to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013625

    Original file (20100013625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he completed 3 months and 6 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He was inducted on 10 February 1970 and was honorably discharged on 18 November 1970. Therefore, he completed 9 months and 2 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He enlisted on 19 November 1970 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023408

    Original file (20110023408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110023408 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his final rank as sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5 prior to release from active duty and transferred to the USAR in this rank.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012191

    Original file (20100012191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that his rank at his time of separation from active duty was SGT not SP5 as shown on his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 5 October 1971. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was promoted to the rank of SGT on 8 February 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018834

    Original file (20140018834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * two DA Forms 2496-1 (Disposition Form) * DA Form 3355-R (Promotion Points Worksheet) * Unit Orders Number 52 * DD Form 214 (2 copies) * DA Form 1577 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A DA Form 2496-1, dated 23 September 1970, wherein the applicant's company commander recommended the applicant be considered for promotion to the rank of SSG/E-6 in the recommended MOS of 11B4G. His DA Form 20 shows in: * Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022190

    Original file (20100022190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in: a. item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) the entry "SGT"; b. item 5b (Pay Grade) the entry "E-5"; c. item 6 (Date of Rank) the entry "22 May 1970"; and d. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) his list of awards to include the: * Bronze Star Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster * Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021586

    Original file (20110021586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The promotion orders provided by the applicant which show he was promoted to SGT/E-5 effective 4 August 1971 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a, 5b, and 6 of his DD Form 214. ...