Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015772
Original file (20130015772.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  3 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015772 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5.

2.  The applicant states he was serving in the rank of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 in June 1971 when he passed an oral examination at a promotion review board in the Republic of Vietnam.  However, the promotion order was not published until 17 January 1972, which was the same date he was separated from the Army.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the U.S. Army on 15 July 1970.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

   a.  item 22 (MOS):  11B2O, Light Weapons Infantryman, 5 December 1970;

   b.  item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in Vietnam from 2 January 1971 through 13 November 1971; and

   c.  item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), in part, specialist four/E-4 - Date of Rank (DOR):  10 May 1971.

4.  Headquarters, 198th Infantry Brigade, 23d Infantry Division, letter, dated 
20 October 1971, subject:  Recommendation for Promotion to Grade E-5 and 
E-6, and the enclosed Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel, show the applicant was recommended for promotion to E-5 in MOS 11B4O consistent with promotion policy governing MOS position vacancies and quotas.

5.  The applicant was reassigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Carson, CO, on 20 December 1971.

6.  Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Carson, CO, Special Orders Number 14, dated 14 January 1972, promoted the applicant to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 in primary MOS (PMOS) 11B4O, effective 13 December 1971.

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 17 January 1972 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation.  He had completed 1 year, 6 months, and 3 days of net active service this period.  It also shows in:

* item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank):  SP4
* item 5b (Pay Grade):  E-4
* item 6 (DOR):  10 May 1971
* item 23a (Specialty Number and Title):  11B2O, Light Weapons Infantryman, 5 December 1970, Evaluation Score (ES):  None



8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes policies and procedures regarding separation documents.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It states that the purpose of a separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service at the time of separation.  Therefore, it is important the information entered thereon is complete and accurate as of that date.

   a.  Section III (Instructions for Preparation and Distribution of the Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.

   b.  It states, in pertinent part, that all available records will be used as a basis for the preparation of the DD Form 214, including the Enlisted Qualification Record, Officer Qualification Record, and orders.  The instructions show for:

		(1)  item 5a, enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation;

   	(2)  item 5b, enter the pay grade;

   	(3)  item 6, enter the DOR for the grade shown in item 5a; and

    	(4)  item 11, enter PMOS code number, title, date of award, and PMOS evaluation score (ES); if no PMOS ES enter "None."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records show that special orders were published on 14 January 1972 promoting the applicant to SGT/E-5 in PMOS 11B4O effective 13 December 1971.  Records also show he was REFRAD 3 days after the promotion orders were published.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the correct rank, pay grade, DOR, or PMOS that he held at the time he was REFRAD on 17 January 1972.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214.








BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  __X______  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from his DD Form 214 the entry in:

* item 5a and adding "SGT"
* item 5b and adding "E-5"
* item 6 and adding "13 December 1971"
* item 23a and adding "11B4O, Light Weapons Infantryman, 5 December 1970, ES:  None"



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015772



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015772



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001885

    Original file (20090001885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) from specialist four (temporary) (SP4 (T))/E-4 to sergeant (SGT)/E-5. There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of his separation on 29 November 1968, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018834

    Original file (20140018834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * two DA Forms 2496-1 (Disposition Form) * DA Form 3355-R (Promotion Points Worksheet) * Unit Orders Number 52 * DD Form 214 (2 copies) * DA Form 1577 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A DA Form 2496-1, dated 23 September 1970, wherein the applicant's company commander recommended the applicant be considered for promotion to the rank of SSG/E-6 in the recommended MOS of 11B4G. His DA Form 20 shows in: * Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017166

    Original file (20120017166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Having prior active service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1970 in the rank of PFC and he held MOS's 13A and 13E. There are no orders in his records that show he ever served as a CPL/E-4 or was ever promoted to SGT/E-5. There is no evidence in his record that shows he went before a promotion board and was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018797

    Original file (20090018797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 8 February 1972; copies of Special Orders Number 87, 136, and 229, issued by Headquarters, 3d Brigade (Separate), 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), on 5 July 1971, 23 August 1971, and 24 November 1971, respectively; a copy of the 229th Assault Helicopter Battalion Promotion Standing List, dated 30 November 1971; a copy of Special Orders Number 39, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, on 8 February 1972;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008514C070205

    Original file (20060008514C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he earned the MOS of 95B and that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that he was a military policeman. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 28 September 1973, the date of his discharge. Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows he served as a military policeman, in MOS 95B4O, from 11 August 1971 to 9 July 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017672

    Original file (20090017672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Army did not correct its records to show his PMOS was 11B4P. While the applicant received awards for his Infantry service in the Republic of Vietnam to include the CIB, the orders were issued awarding these individual decorations showing the applicant's MOS as 11B at the time of the award. The evidence of record does not support correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his PMOS was 11B4P at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011274

    Original file (20060011274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders 217, paragraph 34, 25th Infantry Division, dated 5 August 1969, withdrew the applicant's PMOS of 11B4O and awarded him 76Y4O (Supply Sergeant). The prescribing regulation, in effect at the time, required that the applicant's PMOS of record on the date of his separation be entered into Item 23a of his DD Form 214, to include the date of its award. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080000750

    Original file (AR20080000750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 23a, of his DD Form 214, shows the entry, "91Q2O (Pharmacist)." Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 shows he served as a pharmacist, in MOS 91Q2O. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in MOS 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman, with a BS Degree in Pharmacy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016298

    Original file (20060016298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 April 1971. The evidence shows that the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-4 effective 7 November 1971. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002226

    Original file (20130002226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Promotion orders * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The regulation, in effect at the time provided that for Item 5a, enlisted personnel would enter the grade in which serving at time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary.