IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 21 September 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100011161
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty):
a. date of separation changed from 18 August 2002 to 15 March 2005;
b. rank and pay grade changed from private first class (PFC)/E-3 to specialist (SPC)/E-4;
c. nearest relative information changed from an address in Debary, Florida, to an address in Calumet, Michigan; and
d. narrative reason for separation changed to show he was permanently retired.
2. The applicant states he was permanently retired on 15 March 2005. He contends the wrong rank was entered at the time the form was prepared and that he remarried on 12 March 2006.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and orders removing him from the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) effective 16 March 2005 in support of this application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 May 1999. He completed initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty 67T (UH-60 Helicopter Repairer).
3. Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to PFC effective 20 November 2000. There is no entry in item 18 indicating he was promoted to SPC.
4. On 9 March 2002, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) does not list the punishment imposed. This DA Form 2627 shows his rank as PFC.
5. A DD Form 2697 (Report of Medical Assessment), dated 13 March 2002, shows his rank as PFC and a DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist), dated 21 March 2002, shows his grade as E-3.
6. His Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings, dated 24 June 2002, show his rank as SPC.
7. Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY, Permanent Orders 095-074, dated 5 April 2002 awarded him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. These orders show his rank as SPC.
8. Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY, Orders 184-0003, dated 3 July 2002, directed his release from assignment and duty because of physical disability effective 18 August 2002. These orders show his rank as PFC.
9. The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) is void of orders showing he was promoted to the rank and grade of SPC/E-4.
10. On 18 August 2002, he was released from active duty by reason of temporary disability and placed on TDRL the following day. Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his DD Form 214 shows his rank as PFC. Item 12 (Separation Date this Period) shows he was separated on 18 August 2002. Item 19b (Nearest Relative) shows a name and address in Debary, Florida. Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) shows "disability, temporary."
11. U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Orders D75-04, dated 16 March 2005, removed the applicant from the TDRL and permanently retired him effective 17 March 2005. These orders show his rank as SPC.
12. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1202, provides that if a member would be qualified for retirement for disability, but for the fact that his disability is not determined to be of a permanent nature and stable, the Secretary shall, if he also determines that accepted medical principles indicate that the disability may be of a permanent nature, place the member's name on the TDRL with retired pay computed under section 1401 of this title.
13. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's OMPF contains several documents showing he held the rank of PFC/E-3 as well as SPC/E-4 during similar time periods. His separation orders show his rank as PFC and there are no orders available in his OMPF showing he was promoted to SPC/E-4. In the absence of promotion orders or a leave and earnings statement showing he held the rank of SPC/E-4 at the time of his separation, it cannot be established conclusively that he held the rank of SPC/E-4 at the time the DD Form 214 was prepared. As result, it must be presumed there is no error in his DD Form 214 pertaining to the rank he held at the time of separation.
2. He was retired from active duty on 18 August 2002 due to temporary disability and was placed on the TDRL the following date. On 16 March 2005, he was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired effective 17 March 2005. His DD Form 214 was properly prepared with the correct separation date and narrative reason for separation when he was retired due to temporary disability on 18 August 2002. His removal from the TDRL and permanent retirement for physical disability was merely an administrative action. There is no error regarding his separation date or narrative reason for separation as shown on his DD Form 214.
3. He also requests that the nearest relative shown on his DD Form 214 be changed due to his marriage years after his separation from active duty. However, the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty and provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. He has not shown through the evidence provided that the entry on his DD Form 214 was incorrect at the time the DD Form 214 was prepared and issued.
4. In view of the above, there is no basis to grant the applicant's request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ __X____ __X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100011161
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100011161
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013698
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 4b (Pay Grade) "SPC" and "E4" * item 23 (Type of Separation) other than retirement 2. Paragraph 2 of these orders show he was released from assignment and duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permitted his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076495C070215
This law applies both at the time a member is placed on the TDRL or the Retired List based on a permanent disability. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was advanced to the rank and pay grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 October 1985, and that he held that rank and pay grade on the date of his REFRAD on 30 April 1986. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013028
BOARD DATE: 18 March 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130013028 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states his DD Form 214 lists his last rank as E4; however, he was retired in the rank of E5. Therefore, items 4a, 4b, and 12h of his 2005 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank and grade as SGT/E5 and effective date of 27 May 2005.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007368
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His records show he was advanced to pay PFC, pay grade E-3, on 1 April 2005. The evidence shows he was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade of PFC, E-3.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072544C070403
The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he retired in the rank and pay grade of specialist/E-4 (SPC/E-4). A USAPDA legal advisor opined that the applicant was placed on the Retired List in the incorrect rank and pay grade and as a result that agency published amended orders D175-5, dated 12 September 2002, which corrected the rank and pay grade listed in the SNL of orders number D32-3 to read SPC/E-4. The evidence of record confirms that on 29...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010254C070208
The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was retired on 3 May 1995 in the rank and pay grade of PFC and E3, respectively, with a date of rank of 9 September 1994. Although the applicant was advanced to specialist, pay grade E4, on 1 January 1991, reenlisted in that rank and pay grade in December 1992, underwent disability processing in 1994, 1995, and 1996, with the disability proceedings reflecting his rank as specialist, assignment orders in late 1994 and in 1995 show that his rank was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016653
The applicant states: * He was removed from the TDRL and elected to enlist in the Regular Army within 90 days of his removal * He completed a USAREC Form 1035 (Request to Change Enlistment Option) wherein he elected to enlist on 17 April 2009 * Due to confusion with the TDRL to active duty process, he was pending reclassification into military occupational specialty (MOS) 89D (Explosive Ordnance Disposal Specialist) * By regulation, a former TDRL PFC would be promoted like they would have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003618C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 October 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060003618 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 15-80 (Army Grade Determination Review Board and Grade Determinations), paragraph 3-1 states, in the case of Enlisted Soldiers, the Army Grade Determination Board will determine the highest grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009541
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he did not provide any evidence showing he appeared before a board for consideration of promotion to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 at any time during his service or that he was in a promotable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017581C071029
The applicant states, in effect, that Soldiers who are processed for separation through the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES), which includes the Military Occupational Specialty Medical Retention Board (MMRB), Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), will not be denied promotion on the basis of a medical disqualification. The applicant's record, which includes a commander's performance statement dated 15 February 2005, provides no indication that...