Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003618C070205
Original file (20060003618C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        24 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060003618


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Carmen Duncan                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Jerome Pionk                  |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Rea Nuppenau                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be placed on the retired
list as specialist (SPC), E-4.

2.  The applicant states that he was eligible for promotion to E-4 on or
about 1 October 2001.  He states he was continually looked over and
unjustly punished due to a company grade Article 15 he received in the
summer of 2001 until his last day at Fort Riley in 2003.  He also states
that his unit did not flag him nor was he barred from reenlistment.

3.  The applicant provides a supplemental letter; his DA Form 3349
(Physical Profile); his Enlisted Record Brief; and his DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 June 1998 for a period
of five years.  He completed basic training and advanced individual
training and was awarded military occupational specialty 95B (Military
Police).

2.  The applicant was promoted to SPC, E-4 on 1 May 2000.

3.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) on the applicant’s DA Form 2-1
(Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was reduced from SPC to PFC on
29 June 2001.  There is no record of nonjudicial punishment under Article
15, Uniform Code of Military Justice in his personnel records.

4.  He was placed on permanent profile on 26 November 2002 for left
shoulder pain (Parsonage Turner Syndrome) with a physical profile of
131111.  The physician directed that the applicant be referred to a Medical
Evaluation Board (MEB).  The MEB and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)
proceedings are not available.

5.  Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized) and Fort Riley Orders
Number 157-0002, dated 6 June 2003, released the applicant from assignment
and duty because of physical disability on 12 June 2003 and placed him on
the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the rank of private first
class (PFC).

6.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and item 4b (Pay Grade) on his DD Form
214 shows his rank and pay grade as “PFC”, “E-3.”  The effective date of
his pay grade is shown as 29 June 2001.

7.  Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice), in pertinent part, provides
the applicable policies for administration of nonjudicial punishment.
Paragraph 3-37 directs that the original of an Article 15 for Soldiers SPC
or corporal (CPL) and below (prior to punishment) will be filed locally in
unit nonjudicial punishment or unit personnel files.  Such locally filed
originals will be destroyed at the end of 2 years from the date of
imposition of punishment or on the Soldier’s transfer to another General
Court-Martial Convening Authority (GCMCA), whichever occurs first.

8.  Title 10, section 1372 states that any member of an armed force who is
retired for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL is
entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following:

      (1) the grade of rank in which he is serving on the date when his
name is placed on the TDRL or the date he is retired;

      (2) the highest temporary grade or rank in which he served
satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the armed force from
which he is retired;

      (3) the permanent regular or reserve grade to which he would have
been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is
retired and which was found to exist as a result of a physical examination;
or

      (4) the temporary grade to which he would have been promoted had it
not been for the physical disability for which he is retired, if
eligibility for that promotion was required to be based on cumulative years
of service or years of service in grade and the disability was discovered
as a result of a physical examination.

9.  Army Regulation 15-80 (Army Grade Determination Review Board and Grade
Determinations), paragraph 3-1 states, in the case of Enlisted Soldiers,
the Army Grade Determination Board will determine the highest grade in
which a Soldier has served satisfactorily for purposes of service/physical
disability retirement, computation of retired pay, or separation for
physical disability.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was promoted to SPC, E-4 on 1 May 2000.

2.  The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record shows he was reduced
from SPC to PFC on 29 June 2001.  There is no record of the Article 15 that
was imposed on 29 June 2001.  However, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, it is presumed his reduction was in conformance with applicable
law and regulations.

3.  The applicant was placed on permanent profile in November 2002.  He was
retired from active duty (TDRL) on 12 June 2003 in the rank of PFC, E-3.

4.  However, the applicant was entitled to be separated from active duty by
reason of physical disability in the grade equivalent to the highest grade
or rank in which he served satisfactorily.  He should have been afforded
the opportunity to have his records reviewed by the Army Grade
Determination Review Board to determine that grade.  He was not afforded
that opportunity.

5.  It appears that an injustice has occurred in this case.  The applicant
has been disadvantaged and it would therefore be equitable to advance him
back to SPC for disability compensation purposes.  In addition, since the
Article 15 would have been locally filed, it is presumed that the
underlying misconduct was probably not that serious or his command would
have taken other actions to permanently document his misconduct.

6.  Therefore, it would be equitable to correct the applicant’s records to
show he was released from active duty on 12 June 2003 as an E-3 and placed
on the TDRL as a SPC, E-4.

BOARD VOTE:

CD______  JP______  RN______  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by amending Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized) and
Fort Riley Orders Number 157-0002, dated 6 June 2003, to show he was
retired in the grade of rank of SPC.

2.  That the Defense Finance and Accounting Service pay to the applicant
all pay and allowances due as a result of the correction in paragraph 1,
above.




                                  Carmen Duncan_________
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060003618                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061024                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |129.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009541

    Original file (20110009541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he did not provide any evidence showing he appeared before a board for consideration of promotion to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 at any time during his service or that he was in a promotable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013698

    Original file (20130013698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 4b (Pay Grade) – "SPC" and "E4" * item 23 (Type of Separation) – other than retirement 2. Paragraph 2 of these orders show he was released from assignment and duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permitted his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002798

    Original file (20080002798.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 May 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002798 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division and Fort Riley Orders 228-0002, dated 16 August 2007, show the applicant was placed on the retired list on 1 September 2007. Land Component, Joint Headquarters Kansas Orders 311-728, dated 7 November 2007, show that the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SGT/E-5 effective 30 August 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002194

    Original file (20110002194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was retired as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. Her DD Form 214 currently shows she was retired due to temporary disability in the rank/pay grade of SPC/E-4 with an effective date of promotion of 22 October 2003. In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction to her DD Form 214 to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with an effective date and date of rank of 10 November 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020325

    Original file (20110020325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 17 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110020325 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Orders Number 201-0028, Headquarters, National Training Center and Fort Irwin, Fort Irwin, CA, dated 20 July 2011, show the applicant was released from duty because of a physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permitted his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 70 percent rating, under Title 10, United States Code...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017581C071029

    Original file (20060017581C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that Soldiers who are processed for separation through the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES), which includes the Military Occupational Specialty Medical Retention Board (MMRB), Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), will not be denied promotion on the basis of a medical disqualification. The applicant's record, which includes a commander's performance statement dated 15 February 2005, provides no indication that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076495C070215

    Original file (2002076495C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This law applies both at the time a member is placed on the TDRL or the Retired List based on a permanent disability. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was advanced to the rank and pay grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 October 1985, and that he held that rank and pay grade on the date of his REFRAD on 30 April 1986. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013028

    Original file (20130013028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 18 March 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130013028 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states his DD Form 214 lists his last rank as E4; however, he was retired in the rank of E5. Therefore, items 4a, 4b, and 12h of his 2005 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank and grade as SGT/E5 and effective date of 27 May 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007368

    Original file (20090007368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His records show he was advanced to pay PFC, pay grade E-3, on 1 April 2005. The evidence shows he was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade of PFC, E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003542

    Original file (20120003542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also states his medical retirement with a 30% disability rating was only based on his condition of asthma. His record contains a DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 13 April 2005, that shows his medical conditions at the time as: Asthma and Chronic left knee pain. The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he did not provide any evidence that shows he appeared before a promotion board for consideration to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 at any time during his service or...