Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010737
Original file (20100010737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	 30 March 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010737 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her reentry eligibility (RE) code from an RE-3 to an RE-1.

2.  The applicant states that she had no negative actions that would have prevented her from continuing her service on active duty and believes the RE-3 code was an administrative error.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 26 June 2009; a copy of U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, Orders C-05-990376, dated 20 May 2009; a copy of a memorandum from her officer in charge, dated 19 February 2010; and a copy of a memorandum from her current commander, dated 24 February 2010.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show she enlisted in the California Army National Guard (ARNG) on 26 September 1989.  She served through multiple extensions or reenlistments in the ARNG, held military occupational specialties 76P (Materiel Control Specialist) and 42A (Human Resources Specialist), and attained the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5.  

2.  Her records also show she transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on an unknown date.

3.  On 16 October 2004, she entered active duty in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) program and was initially assigned to the 478th Transportation Company, Oceanside, CA.

4.  Her records show was promoted to staff sergeant/E-6 on 1 April 2005 and served in Iraq with the 96th Military Police Battalion from 8 August 2005 to on or about 1 October 2006.

5.  On 7 November 2008, she executed a 6-year enlistment in the USAR.  She was assigned to the 88th Regional Readiness Command, Fort Snelling, MN.

6.  On 19 April 2009, she submitted a request for voluntary release from the AGR program due to accepting a Federal government position with the U.S. Embassy in Trinidad.

7.  On 20 May 2009, HRC-St. Louis published Orders C-05-990376 directing her release from active duty (REFRAD) effective 26 June 2009 and transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

8.  She was honorably REFRAD on 26 June 2009.  Her DD Form 214 shows she was REFRAD under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of completion of her required active service.  This form further confirms she completed 4 years, 8 months, and 11 days of creditable active military service during this period.  Item 26 (Separation Code) shows the entry "MBK" and item 27 (Reentry Code) shows the entry "3."

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  It states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the USAR.  Table 3-1 includes a list of the Regular Army RE codes.  An RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.  An RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable.  However, those individuals are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.

10  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It states that item 27 shows the RE code.  It also states these codes are not applicable to officers, U.S. Military Academy (USMA) cadets who fail to graduate or enter USMA from active duty status, or to Reserve Component Soldiers being separated for other than cause.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms she was a member of the USAR serving on active duty in an AGR status.  She was honorably REFRAD on 26 June 2009 and she was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  It appears that her RE code was incorrectly entered as RE-3.  It should have been NA [not applicable] since she was a USAR Soldier who was not separated for cause.  Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show the entry "NA" in item 27 of her DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

_X_____  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry "3" from item 27 of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 June 2009 and replacing it with the entry "NA."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to RE-1.



      ____________X_____________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010737



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010737



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019990

    Original file (20120019990.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her reentry eligibility (RE) code as "1." Pertinent Army regulations provide that individuals will be assigned RE codes prior to discharge or release from active duty based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004542

    Original file (20070004542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her reentry (RE) code on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the ending period 23 December 2003 be corrected. However, evidence of record shows that her DD Form 214 with the ending period 23 December 2004 shows that she was discharged due to parenthood. Therefore, the RE code of "NA" on her DD Form 214 is correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001739

    Original file (20130001739.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her discharge date to show 2 September 2009 instead of 16 December 2011. A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) shows that on 8 April 2008, she requested continuation in the AGR program with an adjusted release from active duty (REFRAD) date of 20 September 2011. The response was that a completed DA Form 4187 requesting early separation from the AGR Program needed to be received at HRC St. Louis not later than 27 September 2009, otherwise, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009681

    Original file (20130009681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Correction of her retirement orders to show she was retired for a disability vice in accordance with (IAW) Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), chapter 61. c. Correction of her DD Form 214 and retirement orders to show she received a permanent disability retirement effective 4 November 2004 vice being placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Orders Number D139-27, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), dated 19 May 2010, show: * she held the rank of SGT * she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020880

    Original file (20130020880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documents in support of her request: a. medical consults for urology, psychology, psychiatry, podiatry, and dermatology, dated 24 September 2010; b. WAMC memorandum, dated 23 November 2010, that authorized the applicant 10 days convalescent leave; c. Health Net Federal Services letter, dated 27 July 2011, that authorized the applicant surgical care from 19 July 2011 to 21 November 2011 for follow-up visits for Solitary Cyst of Breast and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009671

    Original file (20110009671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her separation document lacks the appropriate separation and RE codes for an honorably discharged Soldier. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training and is prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. The evidence of record shows she was a USAR Soldier who was separated from active duty, upon completion of AIT by a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009880

    Original file (20060009880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060009880 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. X The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the reentry (RE) code listed in Item 27 (Reentry Code) of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003959

    Original file (20090003959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With prior enlisted service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 3 years on 29 October 2000. On 19 September 2003, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (now known as HRC), St. Louis, MO, published Orders R-10-006604A01 extending the applicant's AGR duty from 3 years with a release from active duty (REFRAD) date of 4 November 2003, to 5 years, 9 months, and 3 days with a REFRAD date of 7 August 2006. On 7 December 2006, HRC published...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014035

    Original file (20090014035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 12c (Net Service This Period) and Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 June 2009. The statement also shows she served continuously in the USAR not on active duty from 24 June 1982 to 3 June 2005, a period of 22 years, 11 months, and 11 days. The evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR, not on active duty, on 24 June 1982 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...