RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004542 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano Director Mr. Michael J. Fowler Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Mr. Lester Echols Chairperson Mr. John T. Meixell Member Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that her reentry (RE) code on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the ending period 23 December 2003 be corrected. 2. The applicant states, in effect, that there is no legal or understandable RE code on her DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214; a 641st Mobilization Troop Command memorandum, dated 17 December 2004; a Legal Review letter, dated 15 December 2004; and a U. S. Army Human Resources Command memorandum, dated 21 December 2004. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 15 October 1998 for an 8-year term of service. It appears that she entered active duty in an Army Guard Reserve (AGR) status as of 10 November 1998. 2. On 23 December 2004, the applicant was discharged from active duty and the USAR. 3. Her DD Form 214 with the ending period 23 December 2004 shows in item 8.a (Command to which Transferred) "NA," in item 27 (Reentry Code) shows the entry "NA," and in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) shows the entry "PARENTHOOD." 4. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides preparation instructions for the DD Form 214. The instruction for completing item 27 state these codes are not applicable to officers, U.S. Military Academy (USMA) cadets who fail to graduate or enter USMA from active duty status, or to Reserve Component Soldiers being separated for other than cause. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s requested that her RE code be corrected. However, evidence of record shows that her DD Form 214 with the ending period 23 December 2004 shows that she was discharged due to parenthood. By regulation, this mandated that she not be assigned an RE code because she was being separated for other than cause. Therefore, the RE code of "NA" on her DD Form 214 is correct. 2. The applicant should be aware that the entry of "NA" is not an enlistment disqualifier. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___LE __ __JTM __ __RTD__ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ____ Lester Echols __ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20070004542 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 23 AUGUST 2007 TYPE OF DISCHARGE DATE OF DISCHARGE DISCHARGE AUTHORITY DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION DENY REVIEW AUTHORITY MS. MITRANO ISSUES 1. 100.0300.0000 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.