Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009806
Original file (20100009806.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009806 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for speeding; however, he was being fired upon by a sniper and his commander did not want to listen to him.  As a result, he was denied the award of the AGCM because of the NJP.  He also states that he got hit in the head during a rocket attack and required six or eight stitches; however, he was never awarded the Purple Heart.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a DA Form 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ) and a copy of his request for assistance from his congressional representative.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in Louisville, Kentucky on 14 November 1966.  He completed his basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and his advanced individual training as a light vehicle driver at Fort Dix, New Jersey before being transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina for his first duty assignment.

3.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 13 January 1968 for assignment to the 61st Transportation Company.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 29 May 1968.

4.  On 7 August 1968, NJP was imposed against the applicant for disobeying a lawful order issued by the commander to obey the speed limit.  His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-3.  The record of NJP is not contained in the applicant’s official records and was provided by the applicant.

5.  The applicant’s installation clearance record shows that on 25 October 1968, his commander rated his conduct and efficiency as “Excellent.”

6.  On 2 November 1968, he departed Vietnam and was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 11 months, and 18 days of total active service.

7.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and his marksmanship badges.

8.  A review of his records shows that he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any action by the commander to prevent him from being awarded the AGCM.

9.  Further review of his records and the Vietnam Casualty Listing failed to show any evidence to indicate that he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that he required treatment for any such wounds/injuries.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the AGCM.  It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service.  The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.  There is no automatic entitlement to award of the AGCM.

12.  Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC with Palm) Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit.  Additionally, he participated in five campaigns while assigned to Vietnam and thus is entitled to be awarded one silver service star for wear on his already-awarded VSM.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was injured as a result of enemy action, that he was treated for that injury, or that it was made a matter of record.  Therefore, absent such evidence, there is no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.

2.  However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from        14 November 1966 through 2 November 1968.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.  The Article 15 he provided was for a minor offense.

3.  Additionally, the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation.  Accordingly, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show this award as well as one silver service star for wear on his VSM.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  Awarding him the AGCM for the period of 14 November 1966 through 2 November 1968, while serving in the rank of PFC.

   b.  Amending his DD Form 214 to add the AGCM, the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, and one silver service star for wear on his already-awarded VSM.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Purple Heart.

3.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009806





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009806



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066812C070402

    Original file (2002066812C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the RVNCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001479

    Original file (20080001479.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212

    Original file (2003087226C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015603

    Original file (20100015603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Purple Heart, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and three Overseas Service Bars. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018837

    Original file (20080018837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding his award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's official records shows that he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his entire service and his records are void of any derogatory information that could serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004825C070205

    Original file (20060004825C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his three awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), two awards of the Purple Heart, and his award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). On 6 January 1966, he was transferred with his unit to Vietnam. A review of his records as well as the Vietnam Casualty Listing fails to show that the applicant was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart or that he was wounded a second time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020960

    Original file (20140020960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 15 June 1964 to 14 June 1967 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083623C070212

    Original file (2003083623C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded or that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the Purple Heart is not present in this case, the Board finds that the statements submitted by three former members of the applicant's unit at the time, of which one was the first sergeant at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007102

    Original file (20090007102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Vietnam on 15 September 1968. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal (BSM), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001388

    Original file (20080001388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action on 19 September 1967 in Vietnam and that he was medically evacuated for treatment and he was subsequently retired as a result of permanent physical disability. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 4 April 1966 through 22 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...